FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2776067331> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2776067331 endingPage "e221" @default.
• W2776067331 startingPage "e211" @default.
• W2776067331 abstract "BackgroundHow to harness the private sector to improve population health in low-income and middle-income countries is heavily debated and one prominent strategy is social franchising. We aimed to evaluate whether the Matrika social franchising model—a multifaceted intervention that established a network of private providers and strengthened the skills of both public and private sector clinicians—could improve the quality and coverage of health services along the continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and reproductive health.MethodsWe did a quasi-experimental study, which combined matching with difference-in-differences methods. We matched 60 intervention clusters (wards or villages) with a social franchisee to 120 comparison clusters in six districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. The intervention was implemented by two not-for-profit organisations from September, 2013, to May, 2016. We did two rounds (January, 2015, and May, 2016) of a household survey for women who had given birth up to 2 years previously. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who gave birth in a health-care facility. An additional 56 prespecified outcomes measured maternal health-care use, content of care, patient experience, and other dimensions of care. We organised conceptually similar outcomes into 14 families to create summary indices. We used multivariate difference-in-differences methods for the analyses and accounted for multiple inference.FindingsThe introduction of Matrika was not significantly associated with the change in facility births (4 percentage points, 95% CI −1 to 9; p=0·100). Effects for any of the other individual outcomes or for any of the 14 summary indices were not significant. Evidence was weak for an increase of 0·13 SD (95% CI 0·00 to 0·27; p=0·053) in recommended delivery care practices.InterpretationThe Matrika social franchise model was not effective in improving the quality and coverage of maternal health services at the population level. Several key reasons identified for the absence of an effect potentially provide generalisable lessons for social franchising programmes elsewhere.FundingMerck Sharp and Dohme Limited. How to harness the private sector to improve population health in low-income and middle-income countries is heavily debated and one prominent strategy is social franchising. We aimed to evaluate whether the Matrika social franchising model—a multifaceted intervention that established a network of private providers and strengthened the skills of both public and private sector clinicians—could improve the quality and coverage of health services along the continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and reproductive health. We did a quasi-experimental study, which combined matching with difference-in-differences methods. We matched 60 intervention clusters (wards or villages) with a social franchisee to 120 comparison clusters in six districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. The intervention was implemented by two not-for-profit organisations from September, 2013, to May, 2016. We did two rounds (January, 2015, and May, 2016) of a household survey for women who had given birth up to 2 years previously. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who gave birth in a health-care facility. An additional 56 prespecified outcomes measured maternal health-care use, content of care, patient experience, and other dimensions of care. We organised conceptually similar outcomes into 14 families to create summary indices. We used multivariate difference-in-differences methods for the analyses and accounted for multiple inference. The introduction of Matrika was not significantly associated with the change in facility births (4 percentage points, 95% CI −1 to 9; p=0·100). Effects for any of the other individual outcomes or for any of the 14 summary indices were not significant. Evidence was weak for an increase of 0·13 SD (95% CI 0·00 to 0·27; p=0·053) in recommended delivery care practices. The Matrika social franchise model was not effective in improving the quality and coverage of maternal health services at the population level. Several key reasons identified for the absence of an effect potentially provide generalisable lessons for social franchising programmes elsewhere." @default.
• W2776067331 created "2018-01-05" @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5000014031 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5003365034 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5012838522 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5026823453 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5029873390 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5036858117 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5039084117 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5068116514 @default.
• W2776067331 creator A5073618021 @default.
• W2776067331 date "2018-02-01" @default.
• W2776067331 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2776067331 title "Effect of a multifaceted social franchising model on quality and coverage of maternal, newborn, and reproductive health-care services in Uttar Pradesh, India: a quasi-experimental study" @default.
• W2776067331 cites W1924661502 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W1988365738 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W1994877595 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W1999040004 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2012646589 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2019321636 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2066735350 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2069828352 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2075744862 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2099805722 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2102268587 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2110904269 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2112369694 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2120384759 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2121409042 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2122949381 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2128826799 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2132782454 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2147920244 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2155163959 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2175954218 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2194955989 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2256120588 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2345472301 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2461020770 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2527899846 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2621226982 @default.
• W2776067331 cites W2892053163 @default.
• W2776067331 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30454-0" @default.
• W2776067331 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29275135" @default.
• W2776067331 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2776067331 type Work @default.
• W2776067331 sameAs 2776067331 @default.
• W2776067331 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2776067331 countsByYear W27760673312018 @default.
• W2776067331 countsByYear W27760673312019 @default.
• W2776067331 countsByYear W27760673312020 @default.
• W2776067331 countsByYear W27760673312021 @default.
• W2776067331 countsByYear W27760673312022 @default.
• W2776067331 countsByYear W27760673312023 @default.
• W2776067331 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5000014031 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5003365034 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5012838522 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5026823453 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5029873390 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5036858117 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5039084117 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5068116514 @default.
• W2776067331 hasAuthorship W2776067331A5073618021 @default.
• W2776067331 hasBestOaLocation W27760673311 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C121426985 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C121752807 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C147859227 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C2775949068 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C2986740045 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C78491826 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C83864248 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C121426985 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C121752807 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C136264566 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C138816342 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C144024400 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C147859227 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C149923435 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C159110408 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C160735492 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C162324750 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C2775949068 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C2908647359 @default.
• W2776067331 hasConceptScore W2776067331C2986740045 @default.

• next