Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W277624058> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W277624058 startingPage "165" @default.
- W277624058 abstract "Assault on Protective Orders THE continued viability of protective orders and confidentiality agreements is in jeopardy. There has been an increasing attack from some politicians, the media and members of the plaintiffs' bar against these long-established tools to protect outside disclosure of sensitive information. Using the catchy moniker of sunshine statutes, bills have been introduced in Congress, as well as various state legislatures, seeking to restrict or eliminate the opportunity for judges and litigants to control the scope of dissemination of materials generated in litigation. Fortunately, these attempts have not met with success, although the issue continues to surface. It's a right of privacy Court orders and confidentiality agreements are used to ensure the confidentiality of sensitive, private and proprietary information. The United States recognizes a right to privacy, and the right to exclusive ownership of private property is protected under the Constitution. These rights are lost when private information becomes public or a trade secret is revealed to a competitor. If the authority of courts to issue protective orders is diminished, those fundamental rights of litigants cannot be protected. Large amounts of information are generated in litigation, and that information may become part of the public domain without the continued viability of protective orders. Those who find themselves a party to a lawsuit should not be required to surrender these rights. The public's ability to access information produced in litigation must be balanced with litigants' rights to privacy. Recognizing the importance of these apparently conflicting interests, the U.S. Supreme Court has never recognized a First Amendment right on the part of the public to access information used in civil litigation, nor has it recognized a right to access information exchanged in discovery. Disclosure increases costs If protective orders are curtailed or abolished, it is expected that the cost of litigation will increase. If confidentiality cannot be protected, parties will be inclined to fight production of documents that may be sensitive or confidential rather than risk their indiscriminate disclosure. This could make it more difficult for plaintiffs' attorneys to investigate issues in particular cases, because the consequences of public disclosure would interject much broader potential adverse results. …" @default.
- W277624058 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W277624058 creator A5019898105 @default.
- W277624058 date "1999-04-01" @default.
- W277624058 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W277624058 title "Assault on Protective Orders" @default.
- W277624058 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W277624058 type Work @default.
- W277624058 sameAs 277624058 @default.
- W277624058 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W277624058 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W277624058 hasAuthorship W277624058A5019898105 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C2776139478 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C2777134139 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C2780301145 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C71745522 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C77527283 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
- W277624058 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C144133560 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C17319257 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C17744445 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C199539241 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C2776139478 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C2777134139 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C2778272461 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C2778449503 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C2780301145 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C34974158 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C71745522 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C77527283 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C83009810 @default.
- W277624058 hasConceptScore W277624058C97460637 @default.
- W277624058 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W277624058 hasLocation W2776240581 @default.
- W277624058 hasOpenAccess W277624058 @default.
- W277624058 hasPrimaryLocation W2776240581 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W1176888090 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W135988632 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W141576964 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W1508264844 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W1549617754 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W1568262874 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W1583416387 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W1606199506 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W210893617 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W2218374494 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W229160939 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W231347789 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W2599771619 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W2914078916 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W2946637480 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W3049692380 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W3122340733 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W338638063 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W571364231 @default.
- W277624058 hasRelatedWork W1663426071 @default.
- W277624058 hasVolume "66" @default.
- W277624058 isParatext "false" @default.
- W277624058 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W277624058 magId "277624058" @default.
- W277624058 workType "article" @default.