FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2777677291> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2777677291 endingPage "292" @default.
• W2777677291 startingPage "292" @default.
• W2777677291 abstract "Hearing Voice(s)Experiments with Documentary Listening Irina Leimbacher (bio) [L]istening brings humans into being —Lisbeth Lipari, Listening, Thinking, Being: Toward an Ethics of Attunement While ideas of voice have played a significant role in documentary studies, reciprocal acts of listening have played almost none. Construed literally or metaphorically, voice embodies a gamut of meanings. It may signify an utterance of speech, empowered subjectivity, cinematic authorship, or political agency. It has been analyzed and assessed historically, technologically, and ideologically. Not only are there divergent meanings and typologies of voice, but there are also differing opinions about the effectiveness of the roles it is said to play. Nevertheless, in spite of all this attention to voice, the question of listening in documentary film remains theoretically underexplored. In fact, the acts of listening to a film's voices are usually ignored, taken for granted and left solely up to the audience that exists outside the diegesis of the work. Here I argue that at the same time as documentary media fashion and orchestrate both their subjects' speech and their spoken, sonorous voices, they simultaneously constitute us as specific kinds of listening subjects. How we are constituted as listeners, then, has an ethical impact on how we relate to others through film and other media. [End Page 292] It has long been a given in film studies that films and media position their spectators with regard to vision, with regard to how (physically, aesthetically, ideologically) and what one sees. Yet such positioning is perhaps less obvious when it comes to listening. Conventional nonfiction works tend to solicit an inquisitive and acquisitive listening that privileges the intake of coherent, concise verbal information. These works encourage the audience's explicit focus on what is said rather than on how it is said, on lexical meaning rather than on the sounds and rhythms of words spoken. Speech is chopped, elided, and reassembled by media makers to shape a message, emphasizing speech's referential function and minimizing, if not eliminating, digressions, paralinguistic expression, and reflection on vocalized speech itself. Artists and experimental filmmakers, however, have developed strategies that encourage us to listen to the flow and process of the saying rather than focusing solely on the said of speech.1 They do so in part by rendering the sonorous voice more audible so that it stands out alongside and in addition to words. Projecting voices, and not only words, into the realm of collective audibility, they thereby make us aware of our listening practices and proclivities. By creating a space for and even magnifying qualities of sonorous voice—its melodies, tonalities, timbres, and rhythms—they provoke what I here call haptic listening. Such listening fastens on to the affective, expressive, and musical qualities of vocalized speech more than to its referents. It consciously attends to embodied expression as much as to lexical meanings. Bringing new awareness to our process of listening and challenging the limits of what is today culturally audible, these works transform how and what we listen to when we listen to others and to ourselves. After a brief look at claims made for voice(s) in nonfiction film, I focus my discussion on an idea of voice elaborated in the fields of sound studies and philosophy—something entangled with spoken language yet distinct from speech. This particular idea of voice is not contingent on the power of rhetoric or on the projection of inner subjectivity or political agency. Instead, it is a sonorous incarnation of embodied, audible relation—relation both as a telling (as in relating an account) and as a connection between. It is that sonorous thread that links our uttering, perceiving bodies and subjectivities to each other. As Mladen Dolar writes, the voice is the element which ties the subject and the Other together, without belonging to either, just as it formed the tie between body and language without being part of them.2 This voice is the go-between, the transient, transforming wave of sound through which we connect to each other, to language, and to ourselves. Because [End Page 293] the term voice is so overdetermined, I will specify this particular aspect of it as the sonorous voice. An..." @default.
• W2777677291 created "2018-01-05" @default.
• W2777677291 creator A5034055576 @default.
• W2777677291 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W2777677291 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2777677291 title "Hearing Voice(s): Experiments with Documentary Listening" @default.
• W2777677291 cites W1500952994 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W1533277775 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W1560705824 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W1576202156 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W1585867275 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W1971390450 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2038672103 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2126016958 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2409945853 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2474985711 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2604991534 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2798377093 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2900189542 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W3216622450 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W583104475 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W591106111 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W598608797 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W627217196 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W635723505 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W638873301 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W648603434 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W650087677 @default.
• W2777677291 cites W2327484206 @default.
• W2777677291 doi "https://doi.org/10.13110/discourse.39.3.0292" @default.
• W2777677291 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2777677291 type Work @default.
• W2777677291 sameAs 2777677291 @default.
• W2777677291 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2777677291 countsByYear W27776772912017 @default.
• W2777677291 countsByYear W27776772912018 @default.
• W2777677291 countsByYear W27776772912019 @default.
• W2777677291 countsByYear W27776772912020 @default.
• W2777677291 countsByYear W27776772912021 @default.
• W2777677291 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2777677291 hasAuthorship W2777677291A5034055576 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C2775852435 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C2778409124 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C107038049 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C108170787 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C138885662 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C142362112 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C142724271 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C144024400 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C15744967 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C158071213 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C177291462 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C17744445 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C199539241 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C204787440 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C2775852435 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C2778409124 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C36289849 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C41895202 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C46312422 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C71924100 @default.
• W2777677291 hasConceptScore W2777677291C94625758 @default.
• W2777677291 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2777677291 hasLocation W27776772911 @default.
• W2777677291 hasOpenAccess W2777677291 @default.
• W2777677291 hasPrimaryLocation W27776772911 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W1908272674 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W1970536409 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W1987991674 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W2027303180 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W2425262919 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W2461306719 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W2777677291 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W4247034976 @default.
• W2777677291 hasRelatedWork W625742640 @default.
• W2777677291 hasVolume "39" @default.
• W2777677291 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2777677291 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2777677291 magId "2777677291" @default.
• W2777677291 workType "article" @default.