FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2778012291> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2778012291 endingPage "2405" @default.
• W2778012291 startingPage "2395" @default.
• W2778012291 abstract "Within the last few decades, the North American and European dairy industries have been collecting information about lameness and leg injury prevalence on dairy farms and have tried to develop solutions to mitigate these ailments. Few published articles report the prevalence of lameness and leg lesions in areas outside of those 2 regions, or how alternative housing systems, such as compost-bedded packs, affect the prevalence of these maladies. The objectives of this study were to compare the prevalence of lameness and leg lesions on confined dairies that used freestall, compost-bedded packs, or a combination of these 2 systems in Brazil. Data were collected in the autumn and winter of 2016 from 50 dairy farms located in Paraná state, including 12 compost-bedded pack dairies (CB), 23 freestall dairies (FS), and 15 freestall dairies that used compost-bedded packs for vulnerable cows (FS+C). A visit to the farm consisted of a management questionnaire, an inspection of the housing areas as well as the milking parlor, and an evaluation of all lactating cows as they exited the parlor for lameness (score 1-5), hygiene (score 0-2), body condition score (score 1-5), and hock and knee lesions (score 0-1). Median 1-way chi-squared test was used to compare production systems. We found no difference between farm types in management practices related to hoof health management or average daily milk production per cow [31 (29-33.9) kg/d; median (quartile 1-3)], percentage of Holstein cattle in the herd [100% (90-100%)], conception rate [35.8% (30.2-38%)], or pregnancy rate [15% (13.7-18%)]. The CB farms were smaller [85 (49.5-146.5) milking cows] than both the FS [270 (178-327.5) milking cows] and FS+C farms [360 (150-541.5) milking cows). The overall prevalence of severe lameness (score 4 and 5) across all farms was 21.2% (15.2-28.5%) but was lower on the CB farms [14.2% (8.45-15.5%)] in comparison to the FS [22.2% (16.8-26.7%)] and the FS+C farms [22.2% (17.4-32.8%)]. Less than 1% of all cows scored on CB farms were observed with swollen or wounded knees (or both), which was lower than either the FS or FS+C farms [7.4% (3.6-11.9%) and 6.4% (2.6-11.8%) of all cows scored, respectively]. The same pattern was found for hock lesions, where the farm-level prevalence within the 3 different housing types was 0.5% (0-0.9%), 9.9% (0.8-15.3%), and 5.7% (2.6-10.9%) for CB, FS, and FS+C farms, respectively. No differences between farm systems were observed for hygiene or body condition score. On average, 2.7% (0.8-10.9%) of lactating cows had a soiled side, 15.4% (2.1-37.4%) had dirty legs and 1.7% (0-9.3%) had dirty udders. The average herd-level body condition score across farms was 2.9 (2.9-3), with 0.86% of the all cows scored having a body condition score <2.5. These results indicate that lameness prevalence on confined dairies in Brazil is high and highlight the need for remedial changes in environmental design and management practices. We found that CB farms in this region had reduced lameness and lesions in relation to FS or FS+C dairies." @default.
• W2778012291 created "2018-01-05" @default.
• W2778012291 creator A5009208820 @default.
• W2778012291 creator A5025624784 @default.
• W2778012291 creator A5057106871 @default.
• W2778012291 creator A5070545248 @default.
• W2778012291 date "2018-03-01" @default.
• W2778012291 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2778012291 title "Prevalence of lameness and leg lesions of lactating dairy cows housed in southern Brazil: Effects of housing systems" @default.
• W2778012291 cites W1938194413 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W1969080488 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W1977404830 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W1986096968 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2003980101 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2005253750 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2024055184 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2025233393 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2035680763 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2038226750 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2041275869 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2052599657 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2053693853 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2064568520 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2077941538 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2079070751 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2085980952 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2097552239 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2099282537 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2101628919 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2102782856 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2106198422 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2109016872 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2114673194 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2119327620 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2120090398 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2123374326 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2134599226 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2135831792 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2137829230 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2138733392 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2140129224 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2148677211 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2152994354 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2155654515 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2162871177 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2163069486 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2284802946 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2287677467 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2343771818 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2413248147 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2413281554 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2416720672 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2491582107 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2566194816 @default.
• W2778012291 cites W2588786904 @default.
• W2778012291 doi "https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13462" @default.
• W2778012291 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29274968" @default.
• W2778012291 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2778012291 type Work @default.
• W2778012291 sameAs 2778012291 @default.
• W2778012291 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2778012291 countsByYear W27780122912018 @default.
• W2778012291 countsByYear W27780122912019 @default.
• W2778012291 countsByYear W27780122912020 @default.
• W2778012291 countsByYear W27780122912021 @default.
• W2778012291 countsByYear W27780122912022 @default.
• W2778012291 countsByYear W27780122912023 @default.
• W2778012291 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2778012291 hasAuthorship W2778012291A5009208820 @default.
• W2778012291 hasAuthorship W2778012291A5025624784 @default.
• W2778012291 hasAuthorship W2778012291A5057106871 @default.
• W2778012291 hasAuthorship W2778012291A5070545248 @default.
• W2778012291 hasBestOaLocation W27780122911 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C194775826 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C2776977481 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C2779771469 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C2779885849 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C2780883654 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C42972112 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C547646559 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C68443243 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C126322002 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C140793950 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C141071460 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C142724271 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C166957645 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C194775826 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C205649164 @default.
• W2778012291 hasConceptScore W2778012291C2776977481 @default.

• next