FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2779968587> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2779968587 endingPage "63" @default.
• W2779968587 startingPage "52" @default.
• W2779968587 abstract "Abstract Background Many sexual psychophysiologic studies have failed to find differences in physiologic genital arousal between women with and those without sexual dysfunction. However, differences in self-reported (ie, perceived) measures of genital responses between these 2 groups of women have been noted. Aims To determine whether women with and without sexual dysfunction differ on measures of physiologic and perceived genital arousal based on type of analytic technique used, to explore differences in perceived genital arousal, and to assess the relation between physiologic and perceived genital arousal. Methods Data from 5 studies (N = 214) were used in this analysis. Women were categorized into 3 groups: women with arousal-specific sexual dysfunction (n = 40), women with decreased sexual function (n = 72), and women who were sexually functional (n = 102). Women viewed an erotic film while their physiologic genital arousal was measured using a vaginal photoplethysmograph. After watching the film, women completed a self-report measure of perceived genital arousal. Outcomes There were differences in vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA) levels and association of VPA with perceived genital sensations based on level of sexual function. Results Commonly used methods of analysis failed to identify significant differences in VPA among these groups of women. When VPA data were analyzed with hierarchical linear modeling, significant differences emerged. Notably, women with arousal-specific dysfunction exhibited lower VPA than sexually functional women at the beginning of the assessment. As the erotic film progressed, women with arousal-specific dysfunction became aroused at a faster rate than sexually functional women, and these 2 groups ultimately reached a similar level of VPA. Sexually functional women reported the highest levels of perceived genital responses among the 3 groups of women. No significant relation between VPA and perceived genital arousal emerged. Clinical Translation Women's perception of their genital responses could play a role in women's experience of sexual dysfunction and might be more clinically relevant for women with sexual dysfunction than genital blood flow. Strengths and Limitations This study's large sample is unique in sexual psychophysiology, and it strengthens the credibility of the findings. However, this study is limited in that arousal-specific dysfunction was determined with self-report measures, not by a clinician-administered assessment. Conclusion These findings suggest distinct response trajectories in women with and without sexual dysfunction, and although perceived genital responses are important for women who are experiencing problems with arousal, they do not seem to be related to objective measures of physiologic arousal." @default.
• W2779968587 created "2018-01-05" @default.
• W2779968587 creator A5024576801 @default.
• W2779968587 creator A5039757975 @default.
• W2779968587 creator A5067171600 @default.
• W2779968587 creator A5088431892 @default.
• W2779968587 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2779968587 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2779968587 title "Differences in Perceived and Physiologic Genital Arousal Between Women With and Without Sexual Dysfunction" @default.
• W2779968587 cites W1512297054 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W1518811922 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W1535533915 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2010457767 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2027525274 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2057179563 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2081922568 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2099981403 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2101186984 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2112997260 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2119160928 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2120115760 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2120385927 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2122205316 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2129162500 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2162238066 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2163116094 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2312423425 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2316813197 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2474148115 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2570148672 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2620189549 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W2768557466 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W4241924295 @default.
• W2779968587 cites W4302599714 @default.
• W2779968587 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.11.009" @default.
• W2779968587 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29289375" @default.
• W2779968587 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2779968587 type Work @default.
• W2779968587 sameAs 2779968587 @default.
• W2779968587 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2779968587 countsByYear W27799685872020 @default.
• W2779968587 countsByYear W27799685872021 @default.
• W2779968587 countsByYear W27799685872022 @default.
• W2779968587 countsByYear W27799685872023 @default.
• W2779968587 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2779968587 hasAuthorship W2779968587A5024576801 @default.
• W2779968587 hasAuthorship W2779968587A5039757975 @default.
• W2779968587 hasAuthorship W2779968587A5067171600 @default.
• W2779968587 hasAuthorship W2779968587A5088431892 @default.
• W2779968587 hasBestOaLocation W27799685871 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C183021626 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C2775871022 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C2778093883 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C2778577535 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C36951298 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C42407357 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C126322002 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C15744967 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C183021626 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C2775871022 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C2778093883 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C2778577535 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C36951298 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C42407357 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C54355233 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C548259974 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C70410870 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C71924100 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C77805123 @default.
• W2779968587 hasConceptScore W2779968587C86803240 @default.
• W2779968587 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2779968587 hasLocation W27799685871 @default.
• W2779968587 hasLocation W27799685872 @default.
• W2779968587 hasOpenAccess W2779968587 @default.
• W2779968587 hasPrimaryLocation W27799685871 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W1968812451 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W2004635749 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W2055928997 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W2102325098 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W2150779914 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W2475113005 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W2779968587 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W2788583705 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W3173501090 @default.
• W2779968587 hasRelatedWork W4248946562 @default.
• W2779968587 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2779968587 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2779968587 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2779968587 magId "2779968587" @default.
• W2779968587 workType "article" @default.