FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2781853909> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2781853909 endingPage "E10" @default.
• W2781853909 startingPage "E10" @default.
• W2781853909 abstract "OBJECTIVE Spondylosis with or without spondylolisthesis that does not respond to conservative management has an excellent outcome with direct pars interarticularis repair. Direct repair preserves the segmental spinal motion. A number of operative techniques for direct repair are practiced; however, the procedure of choice is not clearly defined. The present study aims to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of the different operative techniques and their outcomes. METHODS A meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL ( Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature ). Studies of patients with spondylolysis with or without low-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent direct repair were included. The patients were divided into 4 groups based on the operative technique used: the Buck repair group, Scott repair group, Morscher repair group, and pedicle screw–based repair group. The pooled data were analyzed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Tests for bias and heterogeneity were performed. The I 2 statistic was calculated, and the results were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using StatsDirect version 2. RESULTS Forty-six studies consisting of 900 patients were included in the study. The majority of the patients were in their 2nd decade of life. The Buck group included 19 studies with 305 patients; the Scott group had 8 studies with 162 patients. The Morscher method included 5 studies with 193 patients, and the pedicle group included 14 studies with 240 patients. The overall pooled fusion, complication, and outcome rates were calculated. The pooled rates for fusion for the Buck, Scott, Morscher, and pedicle screw groups were 83.53%, 81.57%, 77.72%, and 90.21%, respectively. The pooled complication rates for the Buck, Scott, Morscher, and pedicle screw groups were 13.41%, 22.35%, 27.42%, and 12.8%, respectively, and the pooled positive outcome rates for the Buck, Scott, Morscher, and pedicle screw groups were 84.33%, 82.49%, 80.30%, and 80.1%, respectively. The pedicle group had the best fusion rate and lowest complication rate. CONCLUSIONS The pedicle screw–based direct pars repair for spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis is the best choice of procedure, with the highest fusion and lowest complication rates, followed by the Buck repair. The Morscher and Scott repairs were associated with a high rate of complication and lower rates of fusion." @default.
• W2781853909 created "2018-01-12" @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5018218427 @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5019640792 @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5025711516 @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5040456439 @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5046563757 @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5054727722 @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5088626058 @default.
• W2781853909 creator A5091423572 @default.
• W2781853909 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2781853909 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2781853909 title "A comparison of the techniques of direct pars interarticularis repairs for spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis" @default.
• W2781853909 cites W139528100 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1601138889 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1742320972 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1896031412 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1910989313 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1944676875 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1992168361 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1992256988 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1994158072 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W1996828257 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2004424048 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2005207351 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2005483868 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2005510544 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2014423450 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2024796309 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2025542555 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2031988107 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2035276669 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2044792323 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2053628061 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2057362655 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2057723653 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2073126753 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2078886866 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2079646641 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2088127711 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2091644427 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2092365101 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2093179145 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2093986910 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2127739370 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2140650202 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2150554091 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2153613225 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2159083048 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2255047417 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2259013253 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2327001123 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2328786404 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2537958202 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W2741534051 @default.
• W2781853909 cites W4361867807 @default.
• W2781853909 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.11.focus17581" @default.
• W2781853909 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29290131" @default.
• W2781853909 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2781853909 type Work @default.
• W2781853909 sameAs 2781853909 @default.
• W2781853909 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W2781853909 countsByYear W27818539092019 @default.
• W2781853909 countsByYear W27818539092020 @default.
• W2781853909 countsByYear W27818539092021 @default.
• W2781853909 countsByYear W27818539092022 @default.
• W2781853909 countsByYear W27818539092023 @default.
• W2781853909 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5018218427 @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5019640792 @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5025711516 @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5040456439 @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5046563757 @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5054727722 @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5088626058 @default.
• W2781853909 hasAuthorship W2781853909A5091423572 @default.
• W2781853909 hasBestOaLocation W27818539091 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C2776623965 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C2780212340 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C2780307688 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C126322002 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C141071460 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C2776478404 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C2776623965 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C2780212340 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C2780307688 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C44575665 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C71924100 @default.
• W2781853909 hasConceptScore W2781853909C95190672 @default.
• W2781853909 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2781853909 hasLocation W27818539091 @default.
• W2781853909 hasLocation W27818539092 @default.

• next