FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2782698256> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2782698256 endingPage "88" @default.
• W2782698256 startingPage "78" @default.
• W2782698256 abstract "The present study was conducted to investigate how fermentation (FE) and enzymatic treatment (ET) of pea affect standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of nutrients in diets with peas as the only protein source, and evaluate the consequences of inclusion of different pea products in turkey diets (100 g/kg) on growth performance and bird health. For FE process, Pisum sativum L. was mixed with water (1:1) containing 4.9 × 108 Bacillus subtilis and licheniformis spores/kg pea (BIOPLUS 2B®, Chr. Hansen, Denmark). The prepared dough was fermented for 48 h at 30 °C. For ET, the dough water contained three enzymes, AlphaGal™ (α-galactosidase – Kerry, USA), RONOZYME® ProAct and VP (protease and pectinases, respectively – DSM, Switzerland). The dough (500 g/kg DM) was incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. Both processes reduced α-galactosides, phytate, trypsin inhibitor activity and resistant starch in peas. For standardized ileal digestibility (SID) assay, 288 turkeys were assigned to 24 pens and received four experimental diets including native (NP), fermented (FEP) and enzymatically treated peas (ETP) as well as a N-free diet (all supplemented with vitamins and minerals). The ETP had better SID of protein, Glu, Phe and Val compared with FEP and NP. Enzymatic treatment of pea also improved standardized ileal digestibility of Ala, Gly, His, Ilu, Leu and Lys (P ≤ 0.05), however digestibility of these nutrients in fermented pea were similar to other two types of pea (P > 0.05). Both processes drastically improved ileal digestibility of starch (P ≤ 0.05). For performance trial, 960 turkeys were allocated into 60 pens and received 4 different diets consisted of a basal mash wheat-SBM diet (CON) and there experimental diets which were prepared by inclusion of each pea products NP (NPD), FEP (FEPD) and ETP (ETPD) in the basal diet at the rate of 100 g/kg. The experiment lasted 105 d. In general, in the most time periods of the performance trial, birds received ETPD or FEPD diets showed better growth performance than those fed NPD diet, while birds in ETPD group displayed similar performance to those fed CON diet. At the end of the trial, birds fed CON and ETPD diets had the best FCR and birds which received NPD diet had the worst one (P ≤ 0.05). Birds in ETPD group showed the best footpad dermatitis score and turkeys in the NPD group had the worst score (P ≤ 0.05). The footpad dermatitis scores for turkeys in CON and FEPD groups were identical and considerably different from those in ETPD and NPD groups (P ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, both processes could improve the nutritional quality of pea by reduction in ANF and increasing ileal starch digestibility. Furthermore, ET process considerably improved SID of protein and AAs in pea. Inclusion of ETP in turkey diets (100 g/kg) demonstrated neither positive nor negative impact on growth performance, while it remarkably improved footpad dermatitis score. The present data shows the feasibility of these processes, particularly ET, for improving the nutritional quality of pea as a protein source for turkey diets." @default.
• W2782698256 created "2018-01-26" @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5001478930 @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5009482845 @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5016472069 @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5025536522 @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5059310710 @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5061566524 @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5066365044 @default.
• W2782698256 creator A5080397295 @default.
• W2782698256 date "2018-03-01" @default.
• W2782698256 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2782698256 title "Fermentation and enzymatic treatment of pea for turkey nutrition" @default.
• W2782698256 cites W1964493251 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W1970450630 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W1970451333 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2010781649 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2023015486 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2028419988 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2035205166 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2035918067 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2036041483 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2037902005 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2060020850 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2066821462 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2089389117 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2098622588 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2104340165 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2112485960 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2116824299 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2119819390 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2121185545 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2135766425 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2137673636 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2150055903 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2151308351 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2159393720 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2171001823 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2221007861 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2332083679 @default.
• W2782698256 cites W2491921471 @default.
• W2782698256 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.01.008" @default.
• W2782698256 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2782698256 type Work @default.
• W2782698256 sameAs 2782698256 @default.
• W2782698256 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2782698256 countsByYear W27826982562018 @default.
• W2782698256 countsByYear W27826982562019 @default.
• W2782698256 countsByYear W27826982562020 @default.
• W2782698256 countsByYear W27826982562021 @default.
• W2782698256 countsByYear W27826982562022 @default.
• W2782698256 countsByYear W27826982562023 @default.
• W2782698256 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5001478930 @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5009482845 @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5016472069 @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5025536522 @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5059310710 @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5061566524 @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5066365044 @default.
• W2782698256 hasAuthorship W2782698256A5080397295 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C100544194 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C142796444 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C181199279 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2775997218 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2776714187 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2777272437 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2778597767 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2779535332 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2779998883 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2781283633 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C2781357212 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C529335014 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C100544194 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C142796444 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C178790620 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C181199279 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C185592680 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2775997218 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2776714187 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2777272437 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2778597767 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2779535332 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2779998883 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2781283633 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C2781357212 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C31903555 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C43617362 @default.
• W2782698256 hasConceptScore W2782698256C523546767 @default.

• next