FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783133838> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2783133838 endingPage "2356" @default.
• W2783133838 startingPage "2348" @default.
• W2783133838 abstract "Chronic nononcological perineal pain has been effectively managed by ganglion Impar block. Chemical neurolysis, cryoablation, and radiofrequency ablation have been the accepted methods of blockade. Recently, pulsed radiofrequency, a novel variant of conventional radiofrequency, has been used for this purpose.This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.Two different interventional pain management centers in India.To compare the efficacy of conventional radiofrequency and pulsed radiofrequency for gangliom Impar block.The patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the conventional radiofrequency (CRF) group (N = 34), conventional radiofrequency ablation was done, and in the PRF pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) group (N = 31), pulsed radiofrequency ablation was done. After informed and written consent, fluoroscopy-guided ganglion Impar block was performed through the first intracoccygeal approach. The extent of pain relief was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) at 24 hours, and at the first, third, and sixth weeks following the intervention. A questionnaire to evaluate subjective patient satisfaction was also used at each follow-up visit.In the CRF group, the mean VAS score decreased significantly from the baseline value at each follow-up visit. But in the PRF group, this decrease was insignificant except at 24-hour follow-up. Intergroup comparison also showed significantly better pain relief in the CRF group as compared with the PRF group. At the end of follow-up, 28 patients (82%) in the CRF group and four patients (13%) in the PRF group had excellent results, as assessed by the subjective patient satisfaction questionnaire. There was no complication in any patient of either study group, except for short-lived infection at the site of skin puncture in a few.Ganglion Impar block by conventional radiofrequency provided a significantly better quality of pain relief with no major side effects in patients with chronic nononcological perineal pain as compared with pulsed radiofrequency.The short-term follow-up period of only six weeks was a major drawback associated with this study." @default.
• W2783133838 created "2018-01-26" @default.
• W2783133838 creator A5019920042 @default.
• W2783133838 creator A5037306617 @default.
• W2783133838 creator A5072811791 @default.
• W2783133838 creator A5076422989 @default.
• W2783133838 creator A5089137775 @default.
• W2783133838 date "2018-01-11" @default.
• W2783133838 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2783133838 title "Conventional Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation vs Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation of Ganglion Impar in Chronic Perineal Pain of Nononcological Origin" @default.
• W2783133838 cites W10653568 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1969555140 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1971110354 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1973718681 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1978704166 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1989389129 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1992028160 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1993108592 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W1993133058 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2001101143 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2017157298 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2022263861 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2025214227 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2025870281 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2028979615 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2039283460 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2039592196 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2040106291 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2044224657 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2053375242 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2067152044 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2070478022 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2074393223 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2074459237 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2111270574 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2125299988 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2136635190 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2138919554 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2150002341 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2153378979 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2157922391 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2234809328 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2321032754 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W2418821580 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W3150004832 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W4229791550 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W4229815271 @default.
• W2783133838 cites W4248442697 @default.
• W2783133838 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx244" @default.
• W2783133838 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29329442" @default.
• W2783133838 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2783133838 type Work @default.
• W2783133838 sameAs 2783133838 @default.
• W2783133838 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2783133838 countsByYear W27831338382018 @default.
• W2783133838 countsByYear W27831338382019 @default.
• W2783133838 countsByYear W27831338382020 @default.
• W2783133838 countsByYear W27831338382021 @default.
• W2783133838 countsByYear W27831338382022 @default.
• W2783133838 countsByYear W27831338382023 @default.
• W2783133838 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2783133838 hasAuthorship W2783133838A5019920042 @default.
• W2783133838 hasAuthorship W2783133838A5037306617 @default.
• W2783133838 hasAuthorship W2783133838A5072811791 @default.
• W2783133838 hasAuthorship W2783133838A5076422989 @default.
• W2783133838 hasAuthorship W2783133838A5089137775 @default.
• W2783133838 hasBestOaLocation W27831338381 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2777377203 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2779088118 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2780355897 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2780375056 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2780934536 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2781334511 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C2993247534 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C105702510 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C126322002 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C141071460 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C14184104 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C24998067 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2775944032 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2776805002 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2777377203 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2778902805 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2779088118 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2780355897 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2780375056 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2780934536 @default.
• W2783133838 hasConceptScore W2783133838C2781334511 @default.

• next