Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783195022> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2783195022 abstract "Ethnographic research can help to establish dialog between conservationists and local people in reintroduction areas. Considering that predator reintroductions may cause local resistance, we assessed attitudes of different key actor profiles to the return of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) to Portugal before reintroduction started in 2015. We aimed to characterize a social context from an ethnoecological perspective, including factors such as local knowledge, perceptions, emotions, and opinions.We conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 131) in three different protected areas and observed practices and public meetings in order to describe reintroduction contestation, emotional involvement with the species, and local perceptions about conservation. Detailed content data analysis was undertaken and an open-ended codification of citations was performed with the support of ATLAS.ti. Besides the qualitative analyses, we further explored statistic associations between knowledge and opinions and compared different geographical areas and hunters with non-hunters among key actors.Local ecological knowledge encompassed the lynx but was not shared by the whole community. Both similarities and differences between local and scientific knowledge about the lynx were found. The discrepancies with scientific findings were not necessarily a predictor of negative attitudes towards reintroduction. Contestation issues around reintroduction differ between geographical areas but did not hinder an emotional attachment to the species and its identification as a territory emblem. Among local voices, financial compensation was significantly associated to hunters and nature tourism was cited the most frequent advantage of lynx presence. Materialistic discourses existed in parallel with non-economic factors and the existence of moral agreement with its protection. The considerable criticism and reference to restrictions by local actors concerning protected areas and conservation projects indicated the experience of an imposed model of nature conservation. Opinions about participation in the reintroduction process highlighted the need for a closer dialog between all actors and administration.Local voices analyzed through an ethnoecological perspective provide several views on reintroduction and nature conservation. They follow two main global trends of environmental discourse: (1) nature becomes a commodified object to exploit while contestation about wildlife is centered on financial return and (2) emblematic wild species create an emotional attachment, become symbolic, and gather moral agreement for nature protection. Lynx reintroduction has been not only just a nature protection theme but also a negotiation process with administration. Western rural communities are not the noble savages and nature protectors as are other traditional groups, and actors tend to claim for benefits in a situation of reintroduction. Both parties comprehend a similar version of appropriated nature. Understanding complexity and diverse interests in local communities are useful in not oversimplifying local positions towards predator conservation. We recommend that professional conservation teams rethink their image among local populations and increase proximity with different types of key actors." @default.
- W2783195022 created "2018-01-26" @default.
- W2783195022 creator A5043561149 @default.
- W2783195022 creator A5081592372 @default.
- W2783195022 creator A5086486345 @default.
- W2783195022 date "2018-01-11" @default.
- W2783195022 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W2783195022 title "The return of the Iberian lynx to Portugal: local voices" @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1523389895 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1563713086 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1924804048 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1942093626 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1963639052 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1968448102 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1978259404 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W1988750159 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2005307596 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2013265966 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2015299631 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2024205849 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2030309459 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2031341370 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2032875533 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2035824801 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2037845267 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2049303613 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2050500045 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2053333435 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2055313188 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2062541785 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2064102786 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2110865525 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2112543425 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2117357388 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2119621275 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2121671343 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2133394096 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2136604352 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2138754877 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2139770146 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2139810297 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2141839736 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2158329405 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2167251327 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2167390851 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2170788012 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2196843030 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2328249526 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2550193690 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2571226805 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W2612483201 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W4206993414 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W4241852105 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W4252925841 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W65239414 @default.
- W2783195022 cites W944837620 @default.
- W2783195022 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0200-9" @default.
- W2783195022 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5765628" @default.
- W2783195022 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29325579" @default.
- W2783195022 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2783195022 type Work @default.
- W2783195022 sameAs 2783195022 @default.
- W2783195022 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W2783195022 countsByYear W27831950222019 @default.
- W2783195022 countsByYear W27831950222020 @default.
- W2783195022 countsByYear W27831950222021 @default.
- W2783195022 countsByYear W27831950222022 @default.
- W2783195022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2783195022 hasAuthorship W2783195022A5043561149 @default.
- W2783195022 hasAuthorship W2783195022A5081592372 @default.
- W2783195022 hasAuthorship W2783195022A5086486345 @default.
- W2783195022 hasBestOaLocation W27831950221 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C179454799 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C18918823 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C2779455803 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C144024400 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C166957645 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C179454799 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C18903297 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C18918823 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C205649164 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C2779343474 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C2779455803 @default.
- W2783195022 hasConceptScore W2783195022C86803240 @default.
- W2783195022 hasFunder F4320334779 @default.
- W2783195022 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2783195022 hasLocation W27831950221 @default.
- W2783195022 hasLocation W27831950222 @default.
- W2783195022 hasLocation W27831950223 @default.
- W2783195022 hasLocation W27831950224 @default.
- W2783195022 hasOpenAccess W2783195022 @default.
- W2783195022 hasPrimaryLocation W27831950221 @default.
- W2783195022 hasRelatedWork W1582764203 @default.
- W2783195022 hasRelatedWork W2072097436 @default.