FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783246457> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2783246457 endingPage "1667" @default.
• W2783246457 startingPage "1658" @default.
• W2783246457 abstract "Abstract Green tree retention and prescribed burning are the practices used to mitigate negative effects of boreal forestry. Beside their effects on biodiversity, these practices should also promote non‐timber forest products ( NTFP s). We assessed: (1) how prescribed burning and tree retention influence NTFP s by examining the production of bilberry, Vaccinium myrtillus and cowberry, Vaccinium vitis‐idaea ; (2) if there are synergies or trade‐offs in the delivery of these NTFP s in relation to the delivery of species richness, focusing on five groups of forest‐dwelling species. We used a long‐term experiment located in eastern Finland, with three different harvesting treatments: clear‐cut logging, logging with retention patches and unlogged, which were combined with or without prescribed burning. Eleven years after the treatment application, we scored plant cover and berry production in different microhabitats within these treatments, while species richness data for five species groups (ground layer lichens and bryophytes, vascular plants, saproxylic beetles, pollinators—here bees and hoverflies) were collected at the stand level. Logging favoured cowberry production, particularly for plants growing in the vicinity of stumps. Logging was detrimental for cover and berry production of bilberry. Retention mitigated these negative effects slightly, but cover and berry production were still substantially lower compared to unlogged forests. Prescribed burning increased the cowberry production in retention patches and in unlogged forest. Bilberry production decreased with burning, except in unlogged forest where the effect was neutral. No single management treatment simultaneously favoured all values— NTFP s and richness—and trade‐offs among values were common. Only bilberry production and beetle diversity were higher under retention forestry, or in unlogged stands, compared to logged stands. Prescribed burning favoured many values when performed in combination with retention forestry, or in unlogged stands, but different treatment combinations favoured different species groups. Synthesis and applications . Our results demonstrate that widely applied conservation practices in managed boreal forests are unlikely to benefit all ecosystem values everywhere. If high multifunctionality is desired, managing at a landscape scale, countering the local trade‐offs among values, may be more appropriate than the stand‐scale conservation practices commonly practiced today." @default.
• W2783246457 created "2018-01-26" @default.
• W2783246457 creator A5001565060 @default.
• W2783246457 creator A5009088913 @default.
• W2783246457 creator A5013554160 @default.
• W2783246457 creator A5015575292 @default.
• W2783246457 creator A5016299094 @default.
• W2783246457 creator A5057115201 @default.
• W2783246457 date "2018-02-13" @default.
• W2783246457 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2783246457 title "Trade-offs in berry production and biodiversity under prescribed burning and retention regimes in boreal forests" @default.
• W2783246457 cites W1954640172 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W1964441177 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W1989350689 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2004789360 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2005266477 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2015745893 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2017548355 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2023633611 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2027690549 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2049701737 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2053765043 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2060038070 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2061069129 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2071557523 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2076676902 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2080350338 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2094714370 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2102884462 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2104356015 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2107159911 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2113283046 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2114735032 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2118838204 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2118910359 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2133659500 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2144673831 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2158774225 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2166678085 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2170805839 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2221282614 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2324753661 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W237563310 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2553849436 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2581640413 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2606589854 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W2758526643 @default.
• W2783246457 cites W3105481948 @default.
• W2783246457 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13098" @default.
• W2783246457 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2783246457 type Work @default.
• W2783246457 sameAs 2783246457 @default.
• W2783246457 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2783246457 countsByYear W27832464572018 @default.
• W2783246457 countsByYear W27832464572019 @default.
• W2783246457 countsByYear W27832464572020 @default.
• W2783246457 countsByYear W27832464572021 @default.
• W2783246457 countsByYear W27832464572022 @default.
• W2783246457 countsByYear W27832464572023 @default.
• W2783246457 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2783246457 hasAuthorship W2783246457A5001565060 @default.
• W2783246457 hasAuthorship W2783246457A5009088913 @default.
• W2783246457 hasAuthorship W2783246457A5013554160 @default.
• W2783246457 hasAuthorship W2783246457A5015575292 @default.
• W2783246457 hasAuthorship W2783246457A5016299094 @default.
• W2783246457 hasAuthorship W2783246457A5057115201 @default.
• W2783246457 hasBestOaLocation W27832464572 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C125620115 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C192392207 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C2775908993 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C2776993194 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C28631016 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C53565203 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C54286561 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConcept C87621631 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C125620115 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C130217890 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C18903297 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C192392207 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C2775908993 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C2776993194 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C28631016 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C39432304 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C53565203 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C54286561 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C86803240 @default.
• W2783246457 hasConceptScore W2783246457C87621631 @default.
• W2783246457 hasFunder F4320310055 @default.
• W2783246457 hasFunder F4320321033 @default.
• W2783246457 hasFunder F4320321108 @default.
• W2783246457 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2783246457 hasLocation W27832464571 @default.
• W2783246457 hasLocation W27832464572 @default.
• W2783246457 hasOpenAccess W2783246457 @default.

• next