FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783402413> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2783402413 abstract "Abstract To economically and efficiently develop unconventional resource plays, the industry has been spending tremendous resources to optimize completion and well spacing by piloting – a trial-and-error approach. However, the approach tends to take long time and cost significant amount of money. As the complex fracturing modeling technology advances, we question: Can we use the latest complex fracturing modeling and reservoir simulation technologies to optimize completion and well spacing?, so that the industry can significantly save piloting time and money, and quickly find the optimal well spacing and corresponding optimal completion. A recent case study in Permian Basin has answered the question well. For a Wolfcamp well completed with crosslinked gel and wide cluster spacing in 2012, we first built a 3-D geological and geomechanical model, and a full wellbore fracturing propagation model, and then calibrated it with multi-stage fracturing pumping history; the resulting complicated fracture network model was then converted into an unstructured grid-based reservoir simulation model, which was then calibrated with the well production history. During the process, discrete natural fracture network (DFN) and stress anisotropy were systematically evaluated to study their impact on fracture growth. Microseismic and tracer log data were used to validate the hydraulic fracturing modeling results. To test if the calibrated geomechanical and reservoir models can be used to optimize well completion design, we then ran the fracturing model with the latest completion design (tighter cluster spacing, slick-water, and more fluid and proppant) and forecasted the well performance. We found out that the resulting well performance is very similar to the performance of those wells with similar completion designs in the same area. After establishing the confidence on the capacity of those models, we then further studied the impact of different completion designs on fracture dimensions and well performance. We examined the distributions of fracture length along the wellbore resulted from different cluster spacings, fracturing fluid types and volume, and proppant amount. We found out (1) the hydraulic fracture length and network complexity mainly depend on DFN and stress anisotropy, and fracturing fluid viscosity; and (2) the fracture length of those fractures initiated from different perforation clusters along wellbore is in a log-normal distribution depending on completion designs, which provides crucial insights to well interference and furthermore on well spacing. Therefore, we can reasonably model complicated fracture propagation and corresponding well performance with the latest modeling technologies, and then optimize well spacing, which should help operators save significant time and money on well completion and spacing piloting projects, and thus speed up field development decision. The paper demonstrates our novel workflow as an effective way to optimize completion design and well spacing by integrating advanced multi-stage fracture modeling with reservoir simulation in unconventional resource plays." @default.
• W2783402413 created "2018-01-26" @default.
• W2783402413 creator A5005683879 @default.
• W2783402413 creator A5059666390 @default.
• W2783402413 creator A5064766521 @default.
• W2783402413 date "2018-01-23" @default.
• W2783402413 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2783402413 title "Optimizing Well Completion Design and Well Spacing with Integration of Advanced Multi-Stage Fracture Modeling & Reservoir Simulation - A Permian Basin Case Study" @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2013130805 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2037912599 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2091901893 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2094786025 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2102256574 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2164341103 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2238147616 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2259532076 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2318671695 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2565603039 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2569022778 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2595610419 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2745466564 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2745507741 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2747268049 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2749483513 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2749821538 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W2760849920 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W3019696665 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W4242628645 @default.
• W2783402413 cites W4242834501 @default.
• W2783402413 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/189855-ms" @default.
• W2783402413 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2783402413 type Work @default.
• W2783402413 sameAs 2783402413 @default.
• W2783402413 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2783402413 countsByYear W27834024132018 @default.
• W2783402413 countsByYear W27834024132019 @default.
• W2783402413 countsByYear W27834024132020 @default.
• W2783402413 countsByYear W27834024132021 @default.
• W2783402413 countsByYear W27834024132022 @default.
• W2783402413 countsByYear W27834024132023 @default.
• W2783402413 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2783402413 hasAuthorship W2783402413A5005683879 @default.
• W2783402413 hasAuthorship W2783402413A5059666390 @default.
• W2783402413 hasAuthorship W2783402413A5064766521 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C108215451 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C187691185 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C2778668878 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C2779096232 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C2779538338 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C7266685 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C108215451 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C127313418 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C13280743 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C146357865 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C151730666 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C162324750 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C165205528 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C175444787 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C187320778 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C187691185 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C2778668878 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C2779096232 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C2779538338 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C41008148 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C43369102 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C7266685 @default.
• W2783402413 hasConceptScore W2783402413C78762247 @default.
• W2783402413 hasLocation W27834024131 @default.
• W2783402413 hasOpenAccess W2783402413 @default.
• W2783402413 hasPrimaryLocation W27834024131 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W2001975965 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W2023791031 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W2728256546 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W2783402413 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W2794217055 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W2895697428 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W2989800358 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W3021645382 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W4229529367 @default.
• W2783402413 hasRelatedWork W4281648980 @default.
• W2783402413 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2783402413 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2783402413 magId "2783402413" @default.
• W2783402413 workType "article" @default.