Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783507624> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W2783507624 endingPage "80" @default.
- W2783507624 startingPage "65" @default.
- W2783507624 abstract "Abstract Purpose This paper proposes an expert assignment method for scientific project review that considers both accuracy and impartiality. As impartial and accurate peer review is extremely important to ensure the quality and feasibility of scientific projects, enhanced methods for managing the process are needed. Design/methodology/approach To ensure both accuracy and impartiality, we design four criteria, the reviewers’ fitness degree , research intensity , academic association , and potential conflict of interest , to express the characteristics of an appropriate peer review expert. We first formalize the expert assignment problem as an optimization problem based on the designed criteria, and then propose a randomized algorithm to solve the expert assignment problem of identifying reviewer adequacy. Findings Simulation results show that the proposed method is quite accurate and impartial during expert assignment. Research limitations Although the criteria used in this paper can properly show the characteristics of a good and appropriate peer review expert, more criteria/conditions can be included in the proposed scheme to further enhance accuracy and impartiality of the expert assignment. Practical implications The proposed method can help project funding agencies (e.g. the National Natural Science Foundation of China) find better experts for project peer review. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first publication that proposes an algorithm that applies an impartial approach to the project review expert assignment process. The simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed method." @default.
- W2783507624 created "2018-01-26" @default.
- W2783507624 creator A5025098986 @default.
- W2783507624 creator A5026370904 @default.
- W2783507624 creator A5071321583 @default.
- W2783507624 date "2017-12-01" @default.
- W2783507624 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
- W2783507624 title "An Accurate and Impartial Expert Assignment Method for Scientific Project Review" @default.
- W2783507624 cites W1573579329 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W1776713878 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W1972300623 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W1975125592 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W2118573797 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W2155461701 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W2157975922 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W2344215109 @default.
- W2783507624 cites W2483031229 @default.
- W2783507624 doi "https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0020" @default.
- W2783507624 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2783507624 type Work @default.
- W2783507624 sameAs 2783507624 @default.
- W2783507624 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2783507624 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2783507624 hasAuthorship W2783507624A5025098986 @default.
- W2783507624 hasAuthorship W2783507624A5026370904 @default.
- W2783507624 hasAuthorship W2783507624A5071321583 @default.
- W2783507624 hasBestOaLocation W27835076241 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C11012388 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C2776950860 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C2780564088 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C58328972 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C11012388 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C111472728 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C111919701 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C127413603 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C138885662 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C154945302 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C17744445 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C199539241 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C2776950860 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C2779530757 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C2780564088 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C41008148 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C42475967 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C539667460 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C58328972 @default.
- W2783507624 hasConceptScore W2783507624C98045186 @default.
- W2783507624 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2783507624 hasLocation W27835076241 @default.
- W2783507624 hasLocation W27835076242 @default.
- W2783507624 hasOpenAccess W2783507624 @default.
- W2783507624 hasPrimaryLocation W27835076241 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2009772222 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2106516007 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2116911522 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2354042856 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2356714872 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2363694442 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2379162918 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2583922050 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W2999778232 @default.
- W2783507624 hasRelatedWork W4308043215 @default.
- W2783507624 hasVolume "2" @default.
- W2783507624 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2783507624 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2783507624 magId "2783507624" @default.
- W2783507624 workType "article" @default.