FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783756373> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2783756373 abstract "Encryption shields private information from malicious eavesdroppers. After years of slow adoption, encryption is finally becoming widespread in consumer-oriented electronic devices and communications services. Consumer-oriented encryption software is now more user-friendly, and much of it turns on encryption by default. These advances enhance privacy and security for millions of people. However, encryption also poses an impediment to law enforcement’s ability to gather electronic evidence. Law enforcement calls this the “going dark” problem. U.S. law enforcement agencies have responded through both legal and technological means to encryption’s perceived threat to their capabilities. The scope of encryption’s impact on those capabilities is not yet clear, and police still have a wealth of data and technical tools at their disposal. Nevertheless, sophisticated criminals can use encryption to stymie investigators, forcing them to resort to resource-intensive, tailored measures to investigate those individuals. One means of doing so is through a “side-channel attack.” Our electronic devices are always radiating something—electromagnetic emissions, heat, and so forth. Those emissions reveal information, called “side channel information,” about the device. The physical implementation of a cryptosystem leaks electromagnetic emissions from which academic researchers have shown it is possible to extract the system’s secret encryption keys. Side-channel cryptanalysis is not a known law enforcement tactic at present, but that may change in time. Law enforcement use of side-channel attacks will raise Fourth Amendment issues that will require a fact-intensive analysis to resolve. In determining what legal process (if any) will authorize a side-channel attack, a court will have to carefully examine what information will be acquired, from where, and how. The Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence does not provide clear, predictable guidance for those inquiries. Its decision in Kyllo v. United States supplies the touchstone for the legal analysis of side-channel attacks. However, the Court’s current framework for electronic surveillance cannot adequately safeguard Americans’ privacy interests from erosion by technological advances." @default.
• W2783756373 created "2018-01-26" @default.
• W2783756373 creator A5088923966 @default.
• W2783756373 date "2017-09-01" @default.
• W2783756373 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2783756373 title "Everything Radiates: Does the Fourth Amendment Regulate Side-Channel Cryptanalysis" @default.
• W2783756373 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2783756373 type Work @default.
• W2783756373 sameAs 2783756373 @default.
• W2783756373 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2783756373 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2783756373 hasAuthorship W2783756373A5088923966 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C148730421 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C178489894 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConcept C49289754 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C108827166 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C144133560 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C148730421 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C17744445 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C178489894 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C199539241 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C2780262971 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C38652104 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C41008148 @default.
• W2783756373 hasConceptScore W2783756373C49289754 @default.
• W2783756373 hasOpenAccess W2783756373 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W1505115588 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2000334140 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2020903955 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2116468545 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2118986280 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2186434858 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2338554684 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2346473888 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2433453853 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2464198016 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2492862496 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2617189718 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2804195727 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2981178906 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W3001332533 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W3205577829 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W85120248 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2187198950 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W2824233235 @default.
• W2783756373 hasRelatedWork W3036905431 @default.
• W2783756373 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2783756373 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2783756373 magId "2783756373" @default.
• W2783756373 workType "article" @default.