Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783969979> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W2783969979 endingPage "445" @default.
- W2783969979 startingPage "445" @default.
- W2783969979 abstract "Background: Ileal perforations are a common occurrence in our hospital setup with a majority of cases having an etiology of typhoid. The presentation and management of ileal perforation with special reference to typhoid, nonspecific and traumatic perforations and the outcomes in these patients and the factors affecting prognosis are important. Aims and objectives of the study were to study the management of Ileal perforation. To compare the outcome of two different types of treatment for Ileal perforation i.e. Primary Closure (vs) Resection and Ileostomy.Methods: This is a randomized comparative observational study conducted in general surgery department of Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai between February 2016 to October 2017. A Minimum of 28 patients was included in the study. Diagnosis was made on the basis of the X-ray erect abdomen, ultrasound abdomen, Widal test and intra-operative findings.Results: The common age groups affected was 41-50 years age group (5 patients) and 61-70 years age groups (5 patients). The least affected were 1-10years age group (one patient). The incidence in males was slightly greater than females. Male to female ratio was 2.5:1. Typhoid perforation is the most common case of ileal perforation followed by non-specific perforation. Post-operative complications are more in the primary closure group with 32.14% (9 patients) which is lower when compared to ileostomy group 17.85% (5 patients). Complications of primary closure were wound infection (2 patients), burst abdomen (3 patients), faecal fistula (1 patient), respiratory complications (3 patients). Complications in ileostomy group were wound infection (4 patients) and respiratory complications (one patient).Conclusions: Mortality was more in primary closure group with 21.42% (6 patients) and mortality was less in ileostomy group with 7.14% (2 patients). This study proposes that ileostomy may be given priority over other surgical options in moribund patients." @default.
- W2783969979 created "2018-01-26" @default.
- W2783969979 creator A5026163490 @default.
- W2783969979 creator A5027533691 @default.
- W2783969979 creator A5041352700 @default.
- W2783969979 creator A5077241319 @default.
- W2783969979 date "2018-01-25" @default.
- W2783969979 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2783969979 title "A comparative study on outcome of ileal perforation after primary perforation closure and resection and ileostomy" @default.
- W2783969979 doi "https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180027" @default.
- W2783969979 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2783969979 type Work @default.
- W2783969979 sameAs 2783969979 @default.
- W2783969979 citedByCount "5" @default.
- W2783969979 countsByYear W27839699792020 @default.
- W2783969979 countsByYear W27839699792022 @default.
- W2783969979 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2783969979 hasAuthorship W2783969979A5026163490 @default.
- W2783969979 hasAuthorship W2783969979A5027533691 @default.
- W2783969979 hasAuthorship W2783969979A5041352700 @default.
- W2783969979 hasAuthorship W2783969979A5077241319 @default.
- W2783969979 hasBestOaLocation W27839699791 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C2776341189 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C2778773085 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C2779105634 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C2779983558 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C520601542 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C120665830 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C121332964 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C141071460 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C142724271 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C191897082 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C192562407 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C2776341189 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C2778456384 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C2778527123 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C2778773085 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C2779105634 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C2779983558 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C520601542 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C61511704 @default.
- W2783969979 hasConceptScore W2783969979C71924100 @default.
- W2783969979 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2783969979 hasLocation W27839699791 @default.
- W2783969979 hasOpenAccess W2783969979 @default.
- W2783969979 hasPrimaryLocation W27839699791 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W113810927 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W128172810 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W1997490129 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W2337803410 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W2348809255 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W2417194128 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W2440383363 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W2472497569 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W2783969979 @default.
- W2783969979 hasRelatedWork W3178963806 @default.
- W2783969979 hasVolume "5" @default.
- W2783969979 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2783969979 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2783969979 magId "2783969979" @default.
- W2783969979 workType "article" @default.