FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2783995710> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2783995710 abstract "Abstract This paper details the results from a comprehensive study to evaluate completion effectiveness and optimize field development in the Utica. Optimizing the number and location of perforation clusters, number of stages, and treatment size requires a clear understanding of how these parameters affect fracture geometry and well productivity. The goal of this work was to determine how the number of perforation clusters per stage and treatment size affect fracture geometry and well productivity, and to integrate these results into the overall field development optimization. A comprehensive evaluation of plug and perf (PNP) and controlled entry point (CEP) completions and treatment size was performed using a five-well pad in the Utica (wet gas area). The evaluation included PNP completions with 3-4 perforation clusters and CEP completions with 1-2 perforation clusters. Treatment size was varied by a factor of two to evaluate the effect of fluid volume on fracture length. Microseismic data were gathered on 81 PNP stages and 95 CEP stages. The microseismic data were used to calibrate hydraulic fracture models. Fracture geometries for the five-well pad plus a direct offset well (a six well total of 250+ stages) were discretely gridded in a reservoir simulation model. The reservoir simulation model was calibrated by history matching 14+ months of production data. Proppant Tracer data and DFIT measurements from previous Utica work were used to support the hydraulic fracture modeling and reservoir simulations. The microseismic data provided a clear understanding of the relationship between treatment size and fracture length for each completion scenario. The results indicate that fracture length may be dependent on completion type, with CEP completions showing less fracture length than PNP completions. Simple production comparisons and detailed reservoir simulation history matching showed that (1) well productivity is governed by the number of perforation clusters, with PNP wells outperforming CEP wells and (2) well-to-well communication is evident. This work did NOT identify any gross inefficiencies with PNP completions and suggests that CEP completions do NOT result in better productivity, at least in this Utica pad. The calibrated models were used to optimize perf cluster spacing, treatment size, and well spacing for PNP completions. The optimization results are summarized in the paper, but the focus of the paper is the evaluation of PNP and CEP completions, characterization of hydraulic fracture length-volume relationships, and calibration of hydraulic fracture and reservoir simulation models." @default.
• W2783995710 created "2018-01-26" @default.
• W2783995710 creator A5016562916 @default.
• W2783995710 creator A5053620443 @default.
• W2783995710 creator A5077375310 @default.
• W2783995710 creator A5087637584 @default.
• W2783995710 date "2018-01-23" @default.
• W2783995710 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2783995710 title "Case History of Completion Optimization in the Utica" @default.
• W2783995710 cites W1971238566 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W1992572762 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W1999002887 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2010154177 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2025325570 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2027367829 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2041264815 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2042133641 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2048399771 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2057397064 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2058032203 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2065571341 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2071095224 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2127458784 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2259532076 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2266185748 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2270806727 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2275914861 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2323250745 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2324992528 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2484915548 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2514698124 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2570714964 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2595855350 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2748156272 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2761246343 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2761476419 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W2762082185 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W3156502083 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W4234763707 @default.
• W2783995710 cites W4242628645 @default.
• W2783995710 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/189838-ms" @default.
• W2783995710 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2783995710 type Work @default.
• W2783995710 sameAs 2783995710 @default.
• W2783995710 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2783995710 countsByYear W27839957102018 @default.
• W2783995710 countsByYear W27839957102019 @default.
• W2783995710 countsByYear W27839957102020 @default.
• W2783995710 countsByYear W27839957102021 @default.
• W2783995710 countsByYear W27839957102022 @default.
• W2783995710 countsByYear W27839957102023 @default.
• W2783995710 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2783995710 hasAuthorship W2783995710A5016562916 @default.
• W2783995710 hasAuthorship W2783995710A5053620443 @default.
• W2783995710 hasAuthorship W2783995710A5077375310 @default.
• W2783995710 hasAuthorship W2783995710A5087637584 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C175291020 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C2779096232 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C2779538338 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C7266685 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C127313418 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C127413603 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C165205528 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C175291020 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C187320778 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C199360897 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C2778456384 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C2778527123 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C2779096232 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C2779538338 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C41008148 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C43369102 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C7266685 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C78519656 @default.
• W2783995710 hasConceptScore W2783995710C78762247 @default.
• W2783995710 hasLocation W27839957101 @default.
• W2783995710 hasOpenAccess W2783995710 @default.
• W2783995710 hasPrimaryLocation W27839957101 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W1980036236 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W2001975965 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W2375662131 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W2728256546 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W3021645382 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W3110397399 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W4229529367 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W4253206423 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W4281648980 @default.
• W2783995710 hasRelatedWork W3107439355 @default.
• W2783995710 isParatext "false" @default.

• next