FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2784205956> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2784205956 endingPage "162" @default.
• W2784205956 startingPage "161" @default.
• W2784205956 abstract "INTRODUCTION: Evaluation is crucial for integration of e-Health/m-Health applications into healthcare systems and their further sustainability. However, evaluation of these technologies is often challenged by poor quality of research design, lack of common outcome indicators and no consensus on appropriate methodology. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) could offer a sound methodological basis for these evaluations (1). The aim of this study was to look for HTA reports on e-Health/m-Health technologies and to describe their characteristics and analyze transparency, consistency and thoroughness, with the goal to detect fields for improvements. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, ISI WOS and University of York – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) electronic databases, in order to identify reports that had evaluated e-Health/m-Health technologies, published until 1 April 2016. We used the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) checklist (2) to evaluate transparency and consistency of included reports. We also assessed thoroughness of reports by checking the presence of the domains suggested by European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) HTA Core Model (3). RESULTS: Twenty-eight reports published between 1999 and 2015 were included. Most of reports (71.4 percent) were delivered by non-European countries and only 35.7 percent were classified as full reports. E-Health/m-Health technologies from several fields of medicine, mostly cardiology (21.4 percent) and psychiatry (17.9 percent) were evaluated. Policy question was clearly defined in 32.1 percent of reports, whereas ethical (21.4 percent) and legal implications (3.6 percent) were domains with the least presence. With respect to the EUnetHTA Core Model, around 70 percent of reports dealt with effectiveness and economic evaluation, more than 50 percent described health problem and around 40 percent organizational and social aspects. Remaining domains were evaluated in very few reports. CONCLUSIONS: E-Health/m-Health technologies are increasingly present in the field of HTA. Our work identified a number of elements not being included in the available reports. Several reports missed to respond to relevant assessment elements especially ethical, social and organizational implications. There is a need for strengthening and standardizing methods used for the evaluation of these technologies." @default.
• W2784205956 created "2018-01-26" @default.
• W2784205956 creator A5002655993 @default.
• W2784205956 creator A5020340404 @default.
• W2784205956 creator A5085168236 @default.
• W2784205956 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W2784205956 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2784205956 title "VP31 Health Technology Assessment Evidence On E-Health/M-Health Technologies: Fields For Improvement" @default.
• W2784205956 cites W2156511845 @default.
• W2784205956 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462317003208" @default.
• W2784205956 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2784205956 type Work @default.
• W2784205956 sameAs 2784205956 @default.
• W2784205956 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2784205956 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2784205956 hasAuthorship W2784205956A5002655993 @default.
• W2784205956 hasAuthorship W2784205956A5020340404 @default.
• W2784205956 hasAuthorship W2784205956A5085168236 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C21333345 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C2776354556 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C2776436953 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C154945302 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C15744967 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C160735492 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C17744445 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C180747234 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C199539241 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C21333345 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C2776354556 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C2776436953 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C2779356329 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C2780233690 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C41008148 @default.
• W2784205956 hasConceptScore W2784205956C71924100 @default.
• W2784205956 hasIssue "S1" @default.
• W2784205956 hasLocation W27842059561 @default.
• W2784205956 hasOpenAccess W2784205956 @default.
• W2784205956 hasPrimaryLocation W27842059561 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W1594423318 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W1618389625 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W1995822609 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W2426359736 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W2770565259 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W2887091436 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W3044101112 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W322906419 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W4253828417 @default.
• W2784205956 hasRelatedWork W2270878748 @default.
• W2784205956 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2784205956 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2784205956 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2784205956 magId "2784205956" @default.
• W2784205956 workType "article" @default.