FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2785366336> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2785366336 endingPage "140" @default.
• W2785366336 startingPage "61" @default.
• W2785366336 abstract "In this paper, we formally demonstrate that incorrectly issued patents can survive in the market without judicial review, even when the invention is neither novel nor non-obvious. We support this contention by presenting a game theoretic model that studies the interaction between the patentee and an alleged infringer/challenger. Using this model, we demonstrate the impact of the transaction costs in the patent system at the administrative stage in the Patent Office and at the enforcement stage in the courts, and highlight the inability in our current system to mount effective challenges to improperly granted patents in the current system. We also evaluate how changes in patent litigation costs and the quality of adjudication in the courts affect the incentives to challenge patents thereby affecting the probability of securing a patent. We show that there is a need to advance new mechanisms to improve the administrative processes employed by the Patent Office. Specifically, we support including administrative challenges, such as patent oppositions, in order to improve Patent Office functioning by correcting and limiting the number of improperly granted patents. We describe and analyze the characteristics of such an opposition system, including the costs of such a process, the timing of the process with respect to patent issuance, and the scope of the estoppel granted to such a process for both subsequent oppositions and court challenges to the patent. We conclude that a low-cost, post-grant, opposition process based primarily on written submissions with a limited estoppel effect and administered by Administrative Opposition Judges (AOJs) will serve as an effective instrument for improving the quality of patents that are issued and enforced. In other words, including these incentives for producing better quality patents will decrease the number of incorrectly issued patents. These incentives will improve overall social welfare thereby reducing the incentives for strategic conduct and aggressive patenting in many technology areas. Finally, we present empirical results from an exciting patent reform experiment taking place in Japan in the past four years and compare these results to the insights obtained from our model. Since April 2000, Japan has embraced a dual patent invalidation system that permits patent challenges in both the Japanese Patent Office (JPO) and their District Courts. Our empirical data on dual invalidation processes in Japan from 2000-2003 demonstrate that there are sound economic and institutional reasons for maintaining the ability to raise patent validity challenges in both the Patent Office and the courts since both mechanisms are complementary and necessary." @default.
• W2785366336 created "2018-02-23" @default.
• W2785366336 creator A5042610003 @default.
• W2785366336 creator A5050965639 @default.
• W2785366336 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2785366336 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2785366336 title "WHY BAD PATENTS SURVIVE IN THE MARKET AND HOW SHOULD WE CHANGE?--THE PRIVATE AND SOCIAL COSTS OF PATENTS." @default.
• W2785366336 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2785366336 type Work @default.
• W2785366336 sameAs 2785366336 @default.
• W2785366336 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2785366336 countsByYear W27853663362013 @default.
• W2785366336 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2785366336 hasAuthorship W2785366336A5042610003 @default.
• W2785366336 hasAuthorship W2785366336A5050965639 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C115910719 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C204434341 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C2777381055 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C2780342482 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C2780668109 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C29122968 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C2984145337 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C69677690 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConcept C98965940 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C10138342 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C115910719 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C144133560 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C162324750 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C175444787 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C17744445 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C190253527 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C199539241 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C204434341 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C2776211767 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C2777381055 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C2779777834 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C2780342482 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C2780668109 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C29122968 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C2984145337 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C34974158 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C69677690 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C94625758 @default.
• W2785366336 hasConceptScore W2785366336C98965940 @default.
• W2785366336 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2785366336 hasLocation W27853663361 @default.
• W2785366336 hasOpenAccess W2785366336 @default.
• W2785366336 hasPrimaryLocation W27853663361 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W1570271129 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W1574347654 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W1585233456 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W1588985472 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W1971850165 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W2097861922 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W2197967913 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W224083923 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W2242391707 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W2264880405 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W2282883856 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W27631833 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W2804040347 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W3122206153 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W3122618307 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W3123717776 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W3123901113 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W3123961817 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W3133573780 @default.
• W2785366336 hasRelatedWork W3149937332 @default.
• W2785366336 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W2785366336 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2785366336 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2785366336 magId "2785366336" @default.
• W2785366336 workType "article" @default.