FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2786027979> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2786027979 endingPage "770.e8" @default.
• W2786027979 startingPage "770.e1" @default.
• W2786027979 abstract "PurposeTo review the incidence of union of patients with proximal pole scaphoid fracture nonunions treated using a 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery (1,2 ICSRA) vascularized graft and a small compression screw.MethodsThis is a retrospective case series of 12 patients. Calculations of the size of the proximal pole fragment relative to the total scaphoid were performed using posteroanterior view scaphoid radiographs with the wrist in ulnar deviation and flat on the cassette. Analyses were repeated 3 times per subject, and the average ratio of proximal pole fragment relative to the entire scaphoid was calculated. We reviewed medical records, radiographs, and computed tomography (CT) scans of these 12 patients. The CT scans that were performed after an average of 12 weeks were ultimately used to confirm union of the scaphoid fractures. One patient was unable to have a CT so was excluded from the final calculation.ResultsAll 11 (100%) scaphoid fractures that were assessed by CT were found to be healed at the 12-week assessment point. The mean proximal pole fragment size was 18% (range, 7%–27%) of the entire scaphoid.ConclusionsThe 1,2 ICSRA vascularized graft and compression screw was an effective treatment for patients with proximal pole scaphoid fractures.Type of study/level of evidenceTherapeutic IV. To review the incidence of union of patients with proximal pole scaphoid fracture nonunions treated using a 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery (1,2 ICSRA) vascularized graft and a small compression screw. This is a retrospective case series of 12 patients. Calculations of the size of the proximal pole fragment relative to the total scaphoid were performed using posteroanterior view scaphoid radiographs with the wrist in ulnar deviation and flat on the cassette. Analyses were repeated 3 times per subject, and the average ratio of proximal pole fragment relative to the entire scaphoid was calculated. We reviewed medical records, radiographs, and computed tomography (CT) scans of these 12 patients. The CT scans that were performed after an average of 12 weeks were ultimately used to confirm union of the scaphoid fractures. One patient was unable to have a CT so was excluded from the final calculation. All 11 (100%) scaphoid fractures that were assessed by CT were found to be healed at the 12-week assessment point. The mean proximal pole fragment size was 18% (range, 7%–27%) of the entire scaphoid. The 1,2 ICSRA vascularized graft and compression screw was an effective treatment for patients with proximal pole scaphoid fractures." @default.
• W2786027979 created "2018-02-23" @default.
• W2786027979 creator A5012299043 @default.
• W2786027979 creator A5015594203 @default.
• W2786027979 creator A5043928503 @default.
• W2786027979 creator A5053104646 @default.
• W2786027979 date "2018-08-01" @default.
• W2786027979 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2786027979 title "Proximal Pole Scaphoid Nonunion Reconstruction With 1,2 Intercompartmental Supraretinacular Artery Vascularized Graft and Compression Screw Fixation" @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1710293673 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1918278094 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1926446292 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1931850261 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1973551447 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1983520616 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1986750409 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W1996274813 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2004578599 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2008848458 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2018053591 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2030625309 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2055258676 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2056932487 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2062978358 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2074653995 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2075850853 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2091657886 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2129473193 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2139776684 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W2154697844 @default.
• W2786027979 cites W21600891 @default.
• W2786027979 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.01.001" @default.
• W2786027979 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29426603" @default.
• W2786027979 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2786027979 type Work @default.
• W2786027979 sameAs 2786027979 @default.
• W2786027979 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2786027979 countsByYear W27860279792019 @default.
• W2786027979 countsByYear W27860279792020 @default.
• W2786027979 countsByYear W27860279792021 @default.
• W2786027979 countsByYear W27860279792022 @default.
• W2786027979 countsByYear W27860279792023 @default.
• W2786027979 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2786027979 hasAuthorship W2786027979A5012299043 @default.
• W2786027979 hasAuthorship W2786027979A5015594203 @default.
• W2786027979 hasAuthorship W2786027979A5043928503 @default.
• W2786027979 hasAuthorship W2786027979A5053104646 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C2778860756 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C2779330695 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C2780021535 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C126838900 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C141071460 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C146249460 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C2778216619 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C2778860756 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C2779330695 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C2780021535 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C2780660378 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C2908647359 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C2989005 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C36454342 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C71924100 @default.
• W2786027979 hasConceptScore W2786027979C99454951 @default.
• W2786027979 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2786027979 hasLocation W27860279791 @default.
• W2786027979 hasLocation W27860279792 @default.
• W2786027979 hasOpenAccess W2786027979 @default.
• W2786027979 hasPrimaryLocation W27860279791 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2016171611 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2031079848 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2072891837 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2126500788 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2233408974 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2349548002 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2367328649 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W2937643130 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W4306404043 @default.
• W2786027979 hasRelatedWork W4312362136 @default.
• W2786027979 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2786027979 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2786027979 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2786027979 magId "2786027979" @default.
• W2786027979 workType "article" @default.