FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2787335021> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2787335021 abstract "Population-based surveys currently face the problem of decreasing response rates. Mixed-mode designs are now being implemented more often to account for this, to improve sample composition and to reduce overall costs. This study examines whether a concurrent or sequential mixed-mode design achieves better results on a number of indicators of survey quality. Data were obtained from a population-based health interview survey of adults in Germany that was conducted as a methodological pilot study as part of the German Health Update (GEDA). Participants were randomly allocated to one of two surveys; each of the surveys had a different design. In the concurrent mixed-mode design (n = 617) two types of self-administered questionnaires (SAQ-Web and SAQ-Paper) and computer-assisted telephone interviewing were offered simultaneously to the respondents along with the invitation to participate. In the sequential mixed-mode design (n = 561), SAQ-Web was initially provided, followed by SAQ-Paper, with an option for a telephone interview being sent out together with the reminders at a later date. Finally, this study compared the response rates, sample composition, health indicators, item non-response, the scope of fieldwork and the costs of both designs. No systematic differences were identified between the two mixed-mode designs in terms of response rates, the socio-demographic characteristics of the achieved samples, or the prevalence rates of the health indicators under study. The sequential design gained a higher rate of online respondents. Very few telephone interviews were conducted for either design. With regard to data quality, the sequential design (which had more online respondents) showed less item non-response. There were minor differences between the designs in terms of their costs. Postage and printing costs were lower in the concurrent design, but labour costs were lower in the sequential design. No differences in health indicators were found between the two designs. Modelling these results for higher response rates and larger net sample sizes indicated that the sequential design was more cost and time-effective. This study contributes to the research available on implementing mixed-mode designs as part of public health surveys. Our findings show that SAQ-Paper and SAQ-Web questionnaires can be combined effectively. Sequential mixed-mode designs with higher rates of online respondents may be of greater benefit to studies with larger net sample sizes than concurrent mixed-mode designs." @default.
• W2787335021 created "2018-02-23" @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5011368230 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5016296386 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5026537128 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5026721037 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5027727259 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5045345102 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5071195166 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5071787366 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5075538472 @default.
• W2787335021 creator A5084971678 @default.
• W2787335021 date "2018-01-04" @default.
• W2787335021 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2787335021 title "Mixing modes in a population-based interview survey: comparison of a sequential and a concurrent mixed-mode design for public health research" @default.
• W2787335021 cites W1446694 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W1497030920 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W1528831821 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W1913719678 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W1935406482 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2008167896 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2031506528 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2037983617 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2039488416 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2048533792 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2054606971 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2062395311 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2078143933 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2080869763 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2098031768 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2101807830 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2102581597 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2108770903 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2111970143 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2113020419 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2122992233 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2130835641 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2135120878 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2138706729 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2140899807 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2152019111 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2154396535 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2156813589 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2157168505 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2163646832 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2165925265 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2168966242 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2171648622 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2172036914 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W2731059458 @default.
• W2787335021 cites W4302435679 @default.
• W2787335021 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0237-1" @default.
• W2787335021 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5791202" @default.
• W2787335021 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29423220" @default.
• W2787335021 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2787335021 type Work @default.
• W2787335021 sameAs 2787335021 @default.
• W2787335021 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2787335021 countsByYear W27873350212019 @default.
• W2787335021 countsByYear W27873350212020 @default.
• W2787335021 countsByYear W27873350212021 @default.
• W2787335021 countsByYear W27873350212022 @default.
• W2787335021 countsByYear W27873350212023 @default.
• W2787335021 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5011368230 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5016296386 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5026537128 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5026721037 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5027727259 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5045345102 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5071195166 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5071787366 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5075538472 @default.
• W2787335021 hasAuthorship W2787335021A5084971678 @default.
• W2787335021 hasBestOaLocation W27873350211 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C24845683 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2777858628 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2778149918 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2778834376 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2779318504 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2780128664 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2780877353 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2787335021 hasConcept C73945780 @default.

• next