Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2788016296> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2788016296 endingPage "1307" @default.
- W2788016296 startingPage "1298" @default.
- W2788016296 abstract "ObjectiveThe objective of this review was to perform a rapid evidence summary to determine the prevalence of subaneurysmal aortic aneurysms, growth rates, and risk factors that modulate growth in average-risk men aged 65 years and older. Secondary objectives were to evaluate benefits and harms of lifelong ultrasound (US) surveillance and treatment outcomes for any large aneurysms that develop in the screened population.MethodsWe searched multiple databases (eg, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic and Embase, and the Cochrane Library) on February 16, 2016. Using a liberal accelerated method, two reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance and subsequently screened full-text studies. General study characteristics (eg, country, study design, number of participants) and data (eg, number of men with subaneurysmal aortas, quality of life [QoL], mortality) were extracted. One reviewer performed data extraction and risk of bias assessments, and a second reviewer verified 100% of studies. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus.ResultsThe search identified 37 relevant studies ranging in size from 3 to 52,690 participants. Prevalence of subaneurysmal aortas ranged from 1.14% to 8.53%, and 55% to 88% of these men progressed to a 3.0-cm aneurysm by 5 years of follow-up. Risk factors for growth included the infrarenal aortic diameter at age 65 years, having a subaneurysmal aorta at age 65 years, and current smoking. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey was the most commonly used tool to measure QoL, and QoL was typically lower in people with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Anxiety and depression levels did not differ significantly between comparison groups in any studies. Four studies reported on the number of men whose aorta was subaneurysmal on initial US who went on to surgery. Overall, 10% (57/547) of men initially measuring in the subaneurysmal range progressed to abdominal aortic aneurysm >5.4 cm and received elective surgery; 1% (6/547) received emergency surgery because of a ruptured aorta. Among those who did, mortality rates were much lower for elective (9.5%) vs emergency surgery (50%). Risk of bias was usually low for studies measuring prevalence and moderate and high for studies measuring psychological harms of screening and harms and benefits of surgery. Overall, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework as guidance, the quality of the evidence was generally very low.ConclusionsBecause of the limited evidence and the low quality of the existing evidence, it is not possible to determine confidently whether men with abdominal aortas measuring 2.5 to 2.9 cm should be observed in a lifelong US surveillance program." @default.
- W2788016296 created "2018-03-06" @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5001327852 @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5001759085 @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5010835024 @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5036803715 @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5054077896 @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5054842737 @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5065930021 @default.
- W2788016296 creator A5085126867 @default.
- W2788016296 date "2018-04-01" @default.
- W2788016296 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2788016296 title "Potential benefits and harms of offering ultrasound surveillance to men aged 65 years and older with a subaneurysmal (2.5-2.9 cm) infrarenal aorta" @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1247968195 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1856498608 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1868557119 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1964639531 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1966809236 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1973532594 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1973803703 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1980280218 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1981969273 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1985505428 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1986684945 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1987609279 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W1995442482 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2007836575 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2009061169 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2012137881 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2016111924 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2019046902 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2028667679 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2037747104 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2040084626 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2053339527 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2063791252 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2066316659 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2078151990 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2082200455 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2083979378 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2087785971 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2094271597 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2099946589 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2100365148 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2105428279 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2110786914 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2112548834 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2115257938 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2115820169 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2116559102 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2124081752 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2126188159 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2127221222 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2136315820 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2146751527 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2148531971 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2153080669 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2156100542 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2160394238 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2169301178 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2181810918 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W2405649593 @default.
- W2788016296 cites W4237106607 @default.
- W2788016296 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.074" @default.
- W2788016296 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29477237" @default.
- W2788016296 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2788016296 type Work @default.
- W2788016296 sameAs 2788016296 @default.
- W2788016296 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W2788016296 countsByYear W27880162962019 @default.
- W2788016296 countsByYear W27880162962020 @default.
- W2788016296 countsByYear W27880162962021 @default.
- W2788016296 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5001327852 @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5001759085 @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5010835024 @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5036803715 @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5054077896 @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5054842737 @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5065930021 @default.
- W2788016296 hasAuthorship W2788016296A5085126867 @default.
- W2788016296 hasBestOaLocation W27880162961 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2776867660 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2777466982 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2779993416 @default.
- W2788016296 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.