FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2788265775> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2788265775 endingPage "325" @default.
• W2788265775 startingPage "312" @default.
• W2788265775 abstract "Abstract While articular cartilage changes are considered to be one of the initial events in the pathological cascade leading to osteoarthritis, these changes remain difficult to detect using conventional diagnostic imaging modalities such as plain radiography. The aim of this prospective, experimental, methods comparison study was to compare the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance arthrography, computed tomography (CT), and CT arthrography in the detection of artificially induced articular cartilage defects in the equine carpal joints. Defects were created in the antebrachiocarpal and middle carpal joint using curettage by a board‐certified equine surgeon. Normal articular cartilage thickness varied from a maximum of 1.22 mm at the level of the distal aspect of the radius to a minimum of 0.17 mm in the proximal articular surface of the third carpal bone. Regarding cartilaginous defect measurements the remaining cartilaginous bed range from a maximum of 0.776 mm in the partial thickness defects, and 0 mm (defect reaches the subchondral bone) when total thickness defect were made. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed followed by CT arthrography and magnetic resonance arthrography after antebrachiocarpal and middle carpal intraarticular contrast administration. All images were reviewed by two board‐certified veterinary radiologists, both of whom were blinded to the location, presence of, and thickness of the cartilage defects. A total number of 72 lesions in nine limbs were created. Mean sensitivity for localizing cartilage defects varied between imaging modalities with CT arthrography showing the best sensitivity (69.9%), followed by magnetic resonance arthrography (53.5%), MRI (33.3%), and CT (18.1%) respectively. The addition of contrast arthrography in both magnetic resonance and CT improved the rate of cartilage lesion detection although no statistical significance was found. Computed tomographic arthrography displayed the best sensitivity for detecting articular cartilage defects in the equine antebrachiocarpal and middle‐carpal joints, compared to magnetic resonance arthrography, MRI, and CT." @default.
• W2788265775 created "2018-03-06" @default.
• W2788265775 creator A5015868733 @default.
• W2788265775 creator A5019922422 @default.
• W2788265775 creator A5036059943 @default.
• W2788265775 creator A5046814506 @default.
• W2788265775 creator A5074641106 @default.
• W2788265775 creator A5085139246 @default.
• W2788265775 date "2018-02-18" @default.
• W2788265775 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2788265775 title "Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and arthrography to identify artificially induced cartilage defects of the equine carpal joints" @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1576580272 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1678648095 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1961183550 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1964681933 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1970458797 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1979310009 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1980135186 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1983934767 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W1993804452 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2005243560 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2017038707 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2023894025 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2036600178 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2039622958 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2040893494 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2042789033 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2042948264 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2054741365 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2063893564 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2070743102 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2071545627 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2073290211 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2075649127 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2083763796 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2089598277 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2115690571 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2124368710 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2136438554 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2143429404 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2147322495 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2154012905 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2156015589 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W2160967489 @default.
• W2788265775 cites W95197892 @default.
• W2788265775 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12598" @default.
• W2788265775 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29455473" @default.
• W2788265775 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2788265775 type Work @default.
• W2788265775 sameAs 2788265775 @default.
• W2788265775 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2788265775 countsByYear W27882657752019 @default.
• W2788265775 countsByYear W27882657752020 @default.
• W2788265775 countsByYear W27882657752021 @default.
• W2788265775 countsByYear W27882657752022 @default.
• W2788265775 countsByYear W27882657752023 @default.
• W2788265775 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2788265775 hasAuthorship W2788265775A5015868733 @default.
• W2788265775 hasAuthorship W2788265775A5019922422 @default.
• W2788265775 hasAuthorship W2788265775A5036059943 @default.
• W2788265775 hasAuthorship W2788265775A5046814506 @default.
• W2788265775 hasAuthorship W2788265775A5074641106 @default.
• W2788265775 hasAuthorship W2788265775A5085139246 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C163716698 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C2779789666 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C2780550940 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C2908829342 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C3020332539 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C105702510 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C126838900 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C142724271 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C143409427 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C163716698 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C204787440 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C2776164576 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C2778216619 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C2779789666 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C2780550940 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C2908829342 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C2989005 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C3020332539 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C36454342 @default.
• W2788265775 hasConceptScore W2788265775C71924100 @default.
• W2788265775 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2788265775 hasLocation W27882657751 @default.
• W2788265775 hasLocation W27882657752 @default.
• W2788265775 hasOpenAccess W2788265775 @default.
• W2788265775 hasPrimaryLocation W27882657751 @default.

• next