FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2788707450> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2788707450 abstract "The purpose of this study was to compare the dispute resolution systems of Botswana and South Africa. As far as the South Africa dispute resolution system is concerned extensive literature on the system was carried out to describe its functioning. As for the Botswana dispute resolution system there was not much written about it in the literature, so in order to find out more about this system semi-structured interviews with labour relations experts which include mediators, arbitrators, lecturers, labour lawyers, trade unionists, employers and government officials held. The framework of comparison was developed to compare the elements of dispute resolution systems against each other and secondly to compare each system against the criteria of performance to the system. The two labour relations systems were compared in terms of elements of the system and the performance of the two systems. In the comparisons of the elements of the systems it was found out that in both systems the nature of disputes was collective and individual disputes both of which can be referred to the initial process of mediation or conciliation. However, in Botswana collective disputes can only be referred to arbitration if they remain unresolved in mediation while in South Africa only collective disputes on essential services go to arbitration while others lead to a strike or lockout if unresolved at conciliation. As for coverage both systems have incorporated public service sector employees in the systems after being excluded from the system for a very long time. The only difference is that in Botswana the Police force is not included while in South Africa they are included in the system. Differences in the avenues of disputes in the two countries were noted, in Botswana the rights/individual disputes go to either arbitration or Industrial Court if unresolved at mediation, inter-est/collective disputes can only go to arbitration while in South Africa the route of disputes is specified in the legislation. As for the human resources of the two countries it was found that the South African system has more qualified, trained and sufficiently experienced staff than the Botswana system. As for the processes it was found that for South Africa the initial process is conciliation while in Botswana it is mediation but these two processes were similar in many ways, from mediation/conciliation the next step in both systems is arbitration and just like the conciliation/mediation, arbitration in both countries was found to be similar except that in South Africa it is a public hearing. The two systems were also compared in terms of their performances and the research has established that between the two systems the South African system proved to be more superior on three of the criteria; efficiency, accessibility and legitimacy than the Botswana system. Therefore, the research proposes a number of recommendations for Botswana to implement namely; establishment of a legislated mixed process of mediation-arbitration, making the dispute resolution system…" @default.
• W2788707450 created "2018-03-06" @default.
• W2788707450 creator A5065285461 @default.
• W2788707450 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2788707450 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2788707450 title "A comparison of the Botswana and South African labour dispute: resolution systems" @default.
• W2788707450 cites W1519225586 @default.
• W2788707450 cites W1917376881 @default.
• W2788707450 cites W307424911 @default.
• W2788707450 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2788707450 type Work @default.
• W2788707450 sameAs 2788707450 @default.
• W2788707450 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2788707450 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2788707450 hasAuthorship W2788707450A5065285461 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C131676636 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C139997747 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C160151201 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C162199757 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C167054989 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C175762713 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C179420905 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C2781257228 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C38104776 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConcept C80984254 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C131676636 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C138885662 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C139997747 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C144133560 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C160151201 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C162199757 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C167054989 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C175762713 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C17744445 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C179420905 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C199539241 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C2778137410 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C2781257228 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C38104776 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C41895202 @default.
• W2788707450 hasConceptScore W2788707450C80984254 @default.
• W2788707450 hasLocation W27887074501 @default.
• W2788707450 hasOpenAccess W2788707450 @default.
• W2788707450 hasPrimaryLocation W27887074501 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W1185779985 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W154344787 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W1572032680 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W1606525687 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W1916612744 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W199976313 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W2000680208 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W2103772630 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W2224136897 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W2525690271 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W2764219949 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W2767385943 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W2971633858 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W3161741177 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W3170220161 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W3183840679 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W3190787539 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W3209487033 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W748628233 @default.
• W2788707450 hasRelatedWork W3122596700 @default.
• W2788707450 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2788707450 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2788707450 magId "2788707450" @default.
• W2788707450 workType "article" @default.