FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2789128180> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2789128180 endingPage "80" @default.
• W2789128180 startingPage "61" @default.
• W2789128180 abstract "With the increasing burden of chronic and age-related diseases, and the rapidly increasing number of patients receiving ambulatory or outpatient-based care, nurse-led services have been suggested as one solution to manage increasing demand on the health system as they aim to reduce waiting times, resources, and costs while maintaining patient safety and enhancing satisfaction. The aims of this review were to assess the clinical effectiveness, economic outcomes and key implementation characteristics of nurse-led services in the ambulatory care setting. A systematic review was conducted using the standard Cochrane Collaboration methodology and was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE EBSCO, CINAHL EBSCO, and PsycINFO Ovid (from inception to April 2016). Data were extracted and appraisal undertaken. We included randomised controlled trials; quasi-randomised controlled trials; controlled and non-controlled before-and-after studies that compared the effects of nurse-led services in the ambulatory or community care setting with an alternative model of care or standard care. Twenty-five studies of 180,308 participants were included in this review. Of the 16 studies that measured and reported on health-related quality of life outcomes, the majority of studies (n = 13) reported equivocal outcomes; with three studies demonstrating superior outcomes and one demonstrating inferior outcomes in comparison with physician-led and standard care. Nurse-led care demonstrated either equivalent or better outcomes for a number of outcomes including symptom burden, self-management and behavioural outcomes, disease-specific indicators, satisfaction and perception of quality of life, and health service use. Benefits of nurse-led services remain inconclusive in terms of economic outcomes. Nurse-led care is a safe and feasible model of care for consideration across a number of ambulatory care settings. With appropriate training and support provided, nurse-led care is able to produce at least equivocal outcomes or at times better outcomes in terms of health-related quality of life compared to physician-led care or standard care for managing chronic conditions. There is a lack of high quality economic evaluations for nurse-led services, which is essential for guiding the decision making of health policy makers. Key factors such as education and qualification of the nurse; self-management support; resources available for the nurse; prescribing capabilities; and evaluation using appropriate outcome should be carefully considered for future planning of nurse-led services." @default.
• W2789128180 created "2018-03-06" @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5013633554 @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5022625067 @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5031709820 @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5042746473 @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5058126314 @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5063164106 @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5073914346 @default.
• W2789128180 creator A5075537135 @default.
• W2789128180 date "2018-05-01" @default.
• W2789128180 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2789128180 title "Clinical and economic outcomes of nurse-led services in the ambulatory care setting: A systematic review" @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1556472286 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1561422799 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1895435170 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1967051391 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1967139260 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1967420145 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1970179711 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1976042411 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W1997592243 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2002512581 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2009333446 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2014104213 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2014668673 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2018325384 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2019606707 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2026961163 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2027338160 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2032312509 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2044228382 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2064582770 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2080847743 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2097028250 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2102255401 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2102299774 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2112273644 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2116071114 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2116761453 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2117731410 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2121565819 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2123602096 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2127135751 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2129361092 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2147374305 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2160218003 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2162544110 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2205661153 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2334151336 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2512826499 @default.
• W2789128180 cites W2751793488 @default.
• W2789128180 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.002" @default.
• W2789128180 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29518623" @default.
• W2789128180 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2789128180 type Work @default.
• W2789128180 sameAs 2789128180 @default.
• W2789128180 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W2789128180 countsByYear W27891281802018 @default.
• W2789128180 countsByYear W27891281802019 @default.
• W2789128180 countsByYear W27891281802020 @default.
• W2789128180 countsByYear W27891281802021 @default.
• W2789128180 countsByYear W27891281802022 @default.
• W2789128180 countsByYear W27891281802023 @default.
• W2789128180 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5013633554 @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5022625067 @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5031709820 @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5042746473 @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5058126314 @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5063164106 @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5073914346 @default.
• W2789128180 hasAuthorship W2789128180A5075537135 @default.
• W2789128180 hasBestOaLocation W27891281802 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C124306116 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C35785553 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConceptScore W2789128180C124306116 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConceptScore W2789128180C126322002 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConceptScore W2789128180C141071460 @default.
• W2789128180 hasConceptScore W2789128180C159110408 @default.

• next