FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2789392824> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2789392824 endingPage "664" @default.
• W2789392824 startingPage "657" @default.
• W2789392824 abstract "Background Faecal immunochemical testing is increasingly being used to triage symptomatic patients for suspected colorectal cancer. However, there are limited data on the effect of preanalytical factors on faecal haemoglobin when measured by faecal immunochemical testing. The aim of this work was to evaluate the stability of faecal haemoglobin in faeces and to compare two methods of faecal haemoglobin sampling for faecal immunochemical testing. Methods Six patients provided faeces for faecal haemoglobin measurement which were transferred into specialized collection devices at baseline and at 1, 2, 3 and 7 days after storage at either room temperature or 4°C. A total of 137 patients returned both faeces transferred into the specialized collection device and faeces in a standard collection pot. A quantitative immunoturbidometric method was used to measure faecal haemoglobin and results were compared categorically. Discrepant results were assessed against diagnosis. Results Faecal haemoglobin concentration declined rapidly within a day of storage at room temperature but results remained ≥10 μg Hb/g faeces in 5/6 patients after two days. A faecal haemoglobin result ≥10 μg Hb/g faeces was obtained in 4/6 patients after storage for seven days at 4°C. Results obtained when patients used specialized collection devices were significantly different from results obtained when faeces was transferred into the specialized collection device in the laboratory. Conclusion There is considerable heterogeneity in the sample stability of faecal haemoglobin; therefore, samples should be transferred rapidly into specialized collection devices to prevent false-negative results. Use of collection devices by patients can lead to false-positive results compared with their use in a laboratory." @default.
• W2789392824 created "2018-03-29" @default.
• W2789392824 creator A5043728379 @default.
• W2789392824 creator A5049990096 @default.
• W2789392824 creator A5061591052 @default.
• W2789392824 creator A5072360285 @default.
• W2789392824 creator A5076933666 @default.
• W2789392824 creator A5081236808 @default.
• W2789392824 date "2018-03-29" @default.
• W2789392824 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2789392824 title "Evaluation of sample stability for a quantitative faecal immunochemical test and comparison of two sample collection approaches" @default.
• W2789392824 cites W1154630370 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W123520275 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2033482941 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2050899028 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2144132526 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2211471646 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2400237760 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2523080581 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2575622449 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2753980967 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2760859464 @default.
• W2789392824 cites W2765474761 @default.
• W2789392824 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563218766393" @default.
• W2789392824 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29534613" @default.
• W2789392824 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2789392824 type Work @default.
• W2789392824 sameAs 2789392824 @default.
• W2789392824 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2789392824 countsByYear W27893928242018 @default.
• W2789392824 countsByYear W27893928242019 @default.
• W2789392824 countsByYear W27893928242020 @default.
• W2789392824 countsByYear W27893928242021 @default.
• W2789392824 countsByYear W27893928242023 @default.
• W2789392824 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2789392824 hasAuthorship W2789392824A5043728379 @default.
• W2789392824 hasAuthorship W2789392824A5049990096 @default.
• W2789392824 hasAuthorship W2789392824A5061591052 @default.
• W2789392824 hasAuthorship W2789392824A5072360285 @default.
• W2789392824 hasAuthorship W2789392824A5076933666 @default.
• W2789392824 hasAuthorship W2789392824A5081236808 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConcept C42972112 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConcept C61716771 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConceptScore W2789392824C42972112 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConceptScore W2789392824C61716771 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConceptScore W2789392824C71924100 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConceptScore W2789392824C86803240 @default.
• W2789392824 hasConceptScore W2789392824C89423630 @default.
• W2789392824 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2789392824 hasLocation W27893928241 @default.
• W2789392824 hasLocation W27893928242 @default.
• W2789392824 hasOpenAccess W2789392824 @default.
• W2789392824 hasPrimaryLocation W27893928241 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2036075804 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2114959714 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2129989651 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2130096112 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2376109144 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2409770697 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2784190792 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2944059575 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W2980433862 @default.
• W2789392824 hasRelatedWork W4308896305 @default.
• W2789392824 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W2789392824 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2789392824 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2789392824 magId "2789392824" @default.
• W2789392824 workType "article" @default.