FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2790170993> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2790170993 endingPage "1641" @default.
• W2790170993 startingPage "1636" @default.
• W2790170993 abstract "Background Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) can be complicated by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with potentially catastrophic failure. The purpose of this study was to describe the results of elbow PJI treatment at a tertiary-care referral center. Methods An institutional TEA database was queried for infection and reoperation after TEA. Patients who underwent irrigation and débridement (I&D) with component retention were compared with those who underwent component explantation, antibiotic spacer placement, and reimplantation of a revision TEA. Results A total of 26 patients (10 men; mean age, 64.3 years) were treated for PJI of TEA. There were 3 polymicrobial infections (11.5%) and 13 Staphylococcus aureus infections (50%) (4 methicillin resistant); 6 patients (23.1%) had negative culture results. Ten patients (38.5%) underwent I&D and component retention, with 5 of those patients (5 of 10, 50%) having recurrent infection at an average of 3.1 years (range, 0.25-7.8 years) after I&D. Of 16 patients who underwent antibiotic spacer placement, 12 (75%) underwent 2-stage reimplantation of a TEA. Among those with reimplantation, 4 of 12 (33.3%) required reoperation. In 3 of 12 (25.0%), reoperation was required for infection, whereas 1 of 12 (8.3%) required surgery for mechanical complications. Conclusion Two-stage revision results in a decreased rate of recurrent PJI. Certain patients (those with poor health or well-fixed components) may be more suitable for I&D and component retention, with a demonstrated 50% success rate over a period of 3 years. Longer-term follow-up may result in higher reinfection rates in both groups. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) can be complicated by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with potentially catastrophic failure. The purpose of this study was to describe the results of elbow PJI treatment at a tertiary-care referral center. An institutional TEA database was queried for infection and reoperation after TEA. Patients who underwent irrigation and débridement (I&D) with component retention were compared with those who underwent component explantation, antibiotic spacer placement, and reimplantation of a revision TEA. A total of 26 patients (10 men; mean age, 64.3 years) were treated for PJI of TEA. There were 3 polymicrobial infections (11.5%) and 13 Staphylococcus aureus infections (50%) (4 methicillin resistant); 6 patients (23.1%) had negative culture results. Ten patients (38.5%) underwent I&D and component retention, with 5 of those patients (5 of 10, 50%) having recurrent infection at an average of 3.1 years (range, 0.25-7.8 years) after I&D. Of 16 patients who underwent antibiotic spacer placement, 12 (75%) underwent 2-stage reimplantation of a TEA. Among those with reimplantation, 4 of 12 (33.3%) required reoperation. In 3 of 12 (25.0%), reoperation was required for infection, whereas 1 of 12 (8.3%) required surgery for mechanical complications. Two-stage revision results in a decreased rate of recurrent PJI. Certain patients (those with poor health or well-fixed components) may be more suitable for I&D and component retention, with a demonstrated 50% success rate over a period of 3 years. Longer-term follow-up may result in higher reinfection rates in both groups." @default.
• W2790170993 created "2018-03-29" @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5003799693 @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5033038090 @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5052455495 @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5057973556 @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5058409168 @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5073653497 @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5079842115 @default.
• W2790170993 creator A5085509288 @default.
• W2790170993 date "2018-09-01" @default.
• W2790170993 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2790170993 title "Treatment of periprosthetic joint infection of the elbow: 15-year experience at a single institution" @default.
• W2790170993 cites W1751310863 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W1976745445 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W1991430595 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2006240870 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2088459821 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2108036271 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2141511998 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2420884906 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2471547744 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2529459866 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2561223377 @default.
• W2790170993 cites W2604613472 @default.
• W2790170993 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.035" @default.
• W2790170993 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30045830" @default.
• W2790170993 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2790170993 type Work @default.
• W2790170993 sameAs 2790170993 @default.
• W2790170993 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2790170993 countsByYear W27901709932018 @default.
• W2790170993 countsByYear W27901709932019 @default.
• W2790170993 countsByYear W27901709932020 @default.
• W2790170993 countsByYear W27901709932021 @default.
• W2790170993 countsByYear W27901709932022 @default.
• W2790170993 countsByYear W27901709932023 @default.
• W2790170993 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5003799693 @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5033038090 @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5052455495 @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5057973556 @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5058409168 @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5073653497 @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5079842115 @default.
• W2790170993 hasAuthorship W2790170993A5085509288 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C2778120723 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C2779489039 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C3020326648 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C141071460 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C167135981 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C2778120723 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C2778336525 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C2779489039 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C2781184374 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C3020326648 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C501593827 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C523546767 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C54355233 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C71924100 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C86803240 @default.
• W2790170993 hasConceptScore W2790170993C89423630 @default.
• W2790170993 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2790170993 hasLocation W27901709931 @default.
• W2790170993 hasLocation W27901709932 @default.
• W2790170993 hasOpenAccess W2790170993 @default.
• W2790170993 hasPrimaryLocation W27901709931 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W1492901982 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W1831689624 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W1973963034 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W2126553050 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W2193016926 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W2532165092 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W2548738730 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W2913672316 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W4226270505 @default.
• W2790170993 hasRelatedWork W2119573293 @default.
• W2790170993 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2790170993 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2790170993 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2790170993 magId "2790170993" @default.
• W2790170993 workType "article" @default.