FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2790946872> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2790946872 endingPage "744" @default.
• W2790946872 startingPage "716" @default.
• W2790946872 abstract "Purpose Frequent food safety incidents caused widespread consumer concerns. Even though food safety is one of the weakest links in the fresh food supply chain and influences consumer food choice in ways different from the quality dimension, this factor is hardly proposed as one of the key traditional supplier selection criteria (e.g. quality, delivery, and price) in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to develop a business process decision model to assess the non-compensating food safety sub-criteria in order to disqualify fresh food suppliers that cannot reach the minimum threshold for low probable food safety failure. The preferred fresh food suppliers can minimize the risk of food safety failure and the associated huge food safety failure costs spanning from private consumer anguish to social distress that cause unbearable costs of sales loss and damage to brand image in business. Design/methodology/approach This study proposes a novel approach that combines several well-established multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques, including fuzzy AHP (FAHP), TOPSIS, and ELECTRE, and innovatively apply to analyze supplier performance and prioritize potential fresh food suppliers. This hybrid business process model can enforce compliance to all the five non-compensatory sub-criteria of food safety. Since ELECTRE is a non-compensatory MCDM method, it is therefore particularly applicable for disqualifying high risk fresh food suppliers from further full scale supplier performance evaluation by FAHP and TOPSIS. This hybrid business process decision model is able to capitalize on the strengths of these MCDM methods and offset their deficiencies. Findings This study uses data of an international supermarket chain to validate feasibility of the proposed model. Results indicate that this model is able to assess the non-compensating food safety sub-criteria via the ELECTRE method in order to disqualify fresh food suppliers that cannot reach the minimum threshold for low probable food safety failure. Only the preferred suppliers with the required food safety capability can proceed to the second stage of the supplier selection process. Assessment via the TOPSIS method reveals the ranking order of those top performing suppliers according to their relative scores along all the supplier selection criteria. The TOPSIS ranking results with the selection of the suppliers C, E, A, and F are robust and consistent across all the different scenarios. Practical implications Application to the fresh food industry is possible with the aid of the MCDM methods. The contribution to the body of knowledge in this teaching and research field demonstrates the importance of first identifying the order qualifier for disqualifying those suppliers that do not satisfy the food safety requirements via the ELECTRE method. The proposed assessment procedure complies with the regulatory policy on food safety, and would influence public policy in applying the best practice of food safety regulation. Without first qualifying the potential suppliers on the basis of food safety, wrong decision can be made to select those high food risk suppliers that have relatively higher overall scores in other supplier selection criteria. Using the assessment results has positive economic and commercial impact on the purchasing managers to formulate appropriate purchasing and supplier development strategy to enhance supplier’s food safety performance, whilst maximizing the overall supplier portfolio performance. The improved supplier’s food safety performance will certainly benefit the society’s quality of life as well. Originality/value Based on the analytical MCDM methods of FAHP, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE, purchasing managers can operationalize the Hill’s framework of order qualifier and winner that has primarily been used in the literature and manufacturing industry. This study represents the first move to innovatively apply the FAHP, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE methods to operationalize the Hill’s framework of order qualifier and winner that has primarily been used in the literature and manufacturing industry. Application to the fresh food industry to validate the feasibility of the proposed model has been conceived and implemented in this study. Analysis of the data inputs of a supermarket chain via the three MCDM methods generate the results that fulfill the purpose of achieving the research objective of identifying and managing the supplier base that can deliver the best supplier performance, conditional on first passing the fresh food safety test." @default.
• W2790946872 created "2018-03-29" @default.
• W2790946872 creator A5045940831 @default.
• W2790946872 creator A5056105510 @default.
• W2790946872 creator A5059111744 @default.
• W2790946872 date "2018-06-04" @default.
• W2790946872 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2790946872 title "A business process decision model for fresh-food supplier evaluation" @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1506933850 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1820545889 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1953040175 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1966890770 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1970233244 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1972009325 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1972591816 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1980202356 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1980827276 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1984424820 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1986559757 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1986784468 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1989386272 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1991675992 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1992983421 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W1997136058 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2000136854 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2003074920 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2004698524 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2009788305 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2012076552 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2014121877 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2015265813 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2015820149 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2026168496 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2028448335 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2030327658 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2037767697 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2038805152 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2039296005 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2041179443 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2043189620 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2051728758 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2057862715 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2059536960 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2061404942 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2064802003 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2074472904 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2079322272 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2080175412 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2081409294 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2083260211 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2083389034 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2084674986 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2085443735 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2086349708 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2093089762 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2093535522 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2102209516 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2115351859 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2130505148 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2134022631 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2138631260 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2147680910 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2149554068 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2153055006 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2163225723 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2164797824 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W2189130207 @default.
• W2790946872 cites W28955479 @default.
• W2790946872 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-01-2016-0015" @default.
• W2790946872 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2790946872 type Work @default.
• W2790946872 sameAs 2790946872 @default.
• W2790946872 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2790946872 countsByYear W27909468722019 @default.
• W2790946872 countsByYear W27909468722020 @default.
• W2790946872 countsByYear W27909468722021 @default.
• W2790946872 countsByYear W27909468722022 @default.
• W2790946872 countsByYear W27909468722023 @default.
• W2790946872 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2790946872 hasAuthorship W2790946872A5045940831 @default.
• W2790946872 hasAuthorship W2790946872A5056105510 @default.
• W2790946872 hasAuthorship W2790946872A5059111744 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C108713360 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C11105738 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2790946872 hasConcept C516717267 @default.

• next