Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2791032529> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W2791032529 endingPage "229" @default.
- W2791032529 startingPage "228" @default.
- W2791032529 abstract "As a statistician who is interested in methods of meta-analysis, the letter by Gatchel and Licciardone 3 Gatchel R.J. Licciardone J.C. Potential problems with systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Pain. 2017; 18: 228-229 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar prompted me to examine the article by O'Keeffe et al 10 O'Keeffe M. Purtill H. Kennedy N. Conneely M. Hurley J. O'Sullivan P. Dankaerts W. O'Sullivan K. Comparative effectiveness of conservative interventions for nonspecific chronic spinal pain: Physical, behavioral/psychologically informed, or combined? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2016; 17: 755-774 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar on comparative effectiveness of conservative interventions for nonspecific chronic spinal pain. I was discouraged to find numerous shortcomings in methods, analysis, and reporting that undermine its validity. Criticism for Following Recommended PracticeThe Journal of PainVol. 19Issue 2PreviewThe author David C. Hoaglin criticises the methods used in our review. Specifically, he questions using a random effects model, halving of sample sizes to avoid double counting of participants, and assessing heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. However, we were in line with the recommendations of the Cochrane Back Review Group1 in using these approaches—of which the author is either unaware, or does not acknowledge. This is compounded by the fact that the author provides no evidence-based, rigorously tested alternative for these choices (eg, using the I2 statistic). Full-Text PDF" @default.
- W2791032529 created "2018-03-29" @default.
- W2791032529 creator A5084106675 @default.
- W2791032529 date "2018-02-01" @default.
- W2791032529 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
- W2791032529 title "Problems in Meta-Analysis of Comparative Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions for Nonspecific Chronic Spinal Pain" @default.
- W2791032529 cites W1883430110 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2032506622 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2052547236 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2056822477 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2107328434 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2125776201 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2127622911 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2129670822 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2148361291 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2254729865 @default.
- W2791032529 cites W2584011758 @default.
- W2791032529 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.09.011" @default.
- W2791032529 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29413387" @default.
- W2791032529 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2791032529 type Work @default.
- W2791032529 sameAs 2791032529 @default.
- W2791032529 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2791032529 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2791032529 hasAuthorship W2791032529A5084106675 @default.
- W2791032529 hasBestOaLocation W27910325291 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C2779677306 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C89128539 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C105795698 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C118552586 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C142724271 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C17744445 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C1862650 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C189708586 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C199539241 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C27415008 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C2779473830 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C2779677306 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C33923547 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C71924100 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C83867959 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C89128539 @default.
- W2791032529 hasConceptScore W2791032529C95190672 @default.
- W2791032529 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2791032529 hasLocation W27910325291 @default.
- W2791032529 hasLocation W27910325292 @default.
- W2791032529 hasOpenAccess W2791032529 @default.
- W2791032529 hasPrimaryLocation W27910325291 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W2122489679 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W2903008839 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W2945536231 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W2964601175 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W3092753388 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W3142180870 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W3200584320 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W4328101666 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W4380423232 @default.
- W2791032529 hasRelatedWork W4383736436 @default.
- W2791032529 hasVolume "19" @default.
- W2791032529 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2791032529 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2791032529 magId "2791032529" @default.
- W2791032529 workType "article" @default.