FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W279106645> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W279106645 endingPage "157" @default.
• W279106645 startingPage "157" @default.
• W279106645 abstract "Efforts to improve the Black science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) pipeline have focused on historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs); however, this work generally fails to acknowledge men. This article characterized Black male receipts of bachelor's degrees from HBCUs in STEM fields between 1981 and 2009 using a gendered approach to challenge two paradigms: a White patriarchy that omits African American men in STEM research, and the gendered nature of racial disadvantage in STEM that focuses on women. The study recommended expanding research on the STEM pipeline by acknowledging the importance of ethnicity/race, gender, and academic field simultaneously.Keywords: STEM, African American men, historically Black colleges and universities, genderEven though they cling to patriarchy they are beginning to intuit that it is part of the problem. Lack of jobs, the unrewarding nature of paid labor, and the increased class power of women, has made it difficult for men who are not rich and powerful to know where they stand, (hooks, 2000, p. 71)IntroductionRhetoric and research related to expanding the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pipeline implicitly references an antiquated White, male-female dichotomy. In this paradigm, STEM fields are associated with White men, academic rigor, and the manual labor associated with related work (Slaton, 2010). While this orientation undoubtedly marginalizes White women and women of color, it can also trivialize the experiences and outcomes of men of color in the context of the STEM pipeline. As hooks (2000) explained in the opening quote, men of lower socioeconomic strata can be challenged in a patriarchal context, like STEM, that devalues their racial group. This may be especially problematic in majority minority colleges, like historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs).Expansion of the Black (or African American) STEM pipeline has disproportionately relied on HBCUs to improve Black participation in and completion of STEM degree programs (Chubin & May, 2003; Harvey & Williams, 1989). For example, in 2006 HBCUs conferred 22% of African American science and engineering bachelor's degrees on average (National Science Foundation, NSF, 2010). More than one quarter of Black STEM bachelor's degrees were awarded by HBCUs in seven fields that year: Agricultural Sciences (44.9%), Biological Sciences (32.3%), Computer Sciences (25.3%), Mathematics (32.8%), Chemistry (34.0%), Chemical Engineering (25.1%), and Physics (48.5%; NSF, 2010). Although the contribution of HBCUs to African American STEM bachelor's degree production has declined somewhat since the mid1970s, given that HBCUs represent about 3% of four-year postsecondary institutions and enroll near 20% of Black undergraduates, their contribution to Black STEM completion is laudable.Despite the success by HBCUs, African Americans remain underrepresented among STEM bachelor's degree recipients when compared to their enrollment in bachelor's degree programs overall (NSF, 2010). For example, African Americans represented approximately 15% of all undergraduates enrolled in four-year institutions, 10% of all bachelor's degree recipients in 2008, and accounted for 11% of all STEM bachelor's degrees conferred in that same year (NCES, 2011). Given this underrepresentation among STEM bachelor's degree recipients, and the relative success of HBCUs in promoting African American STEM completion, continued consideration of these institutions is relevant and necessary to improve the Black STEM pipeline.The extant literature on the Black STEM pipeline at HBCUs has by and large failed to consider the role of gender at these institutions. While there is research on African Americans in STEM at HBCUs, and African American female achievement in STEM at HBCUs (e.g., Perna et al., 2009), there is little known about Black men in STEM at HBCUs. In fact, characterizations of STEM success at HBCUs often focus on aggregate institution-level data at HBCUs in comparison to predominately White institutions (PWIs). …" @default.
• W279106645 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W279106645 creator A5067171268 @default.
• W279106645 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W279106645 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W279106645 title "Is it Really a Man's World? Black Men in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics at Historically Black Colleges and Universities" @default.
• W279106645 cites W1517431946 @default.
• W279106645 cites W1550394983 @default.
• W279106645 cites W168211858 @default.
• W279106645 cites W1939058787 @default.
• W279106645 cites W1970043241 @default.
• W279106645 cites W197809057 @default.
• W279106645 cites W1982684498 @default.
• W279106645 cites W1985980362 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2005875880 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2009297525 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2012688534 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2017138529 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2018125869 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2024431607 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2046640022 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2077033959 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2079042416 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2096395855 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2100850131 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2136804430 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2138498211 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2140596329 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2154620158 @default.
• W279106645 cites W2162584345 @default.
• W279106645 cites W327005274 @default.
• W279106645 cites W4236211428 @default.
• W279106645 doi "https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.2.0157" @default.
• W279106645 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W279106645 type Work @default.
• W279106645 sameAs 279106645 @default.
• W279106645 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452014 @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452015 @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452016 @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452019 @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452020 @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452021 @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452022 @default.
• W279106645 countsByYear W2791066452023 @default.
• W279106645 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W279106645 hasAuthorship W279106645A5067171268 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C2777389919 @default.
• W279106645 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C120912362 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C127413603 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C144024400 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C145420912 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C17744445 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C199539241 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C2777389919 @default.
• W279106645 hasConceptScore W279106645C33923547 @default.
• W279106645 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W279106645 hasLocation W2791066451 @default.
• W279106645 hasOpenAccess W279106645 @default.
• W279106645 hasPrimaryLocation W2791066451 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W1685249966 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W1989553781 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W2019656980 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W2094249050 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W2100850131 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W2110145371 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W2404210680 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W245479976 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W2576728625 @default.
• W279106645 hasRelatedWork W4283362798 @default.
• W279106645 hasVolume "82" @default.
• W279106645 isParatext "false" @default.
• W279106645 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W279106645 magId "279106645" @default.
• W279106645 workType "article" @default.