Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2793059205> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 79 of
79
with 100 items per page.
- W2793059205 endingPage "1161" @default.
- W2793059205 startingPage "1157" @default.
- W2793059205 abstract "Purpose In 2014, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) requested public comments on a draft policy requiring NIH-funded, U.S.-based investigators to use a single institutional review board (sIRB) for ethical review of multicenter studies. The authors conducted a directed content analysis and qualitative summary of the comments and discuss how they shaped the final policy. Method Two reviewers independently assessed support for the policy from a review of comments on the draft policy in 2016. A reviewer conducted an open text review to identify prespecified and additional comment themes. A second researcher reviewed 20% of comments; discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Results The NIH received 167 comments: 65% (108/167) supportive of the policy, 23% (38/167) not supportive, and 12% (21/167) not indicating support. Clarifications or changes to the policy were suggested in 102/167 comments (61%). Criteria for selecting sIRBs were addressed in 32/102 comments (31%). Also addressed were institutional review board (IRB) responsibilities (39/102; 38%), cost (27/102; 26%), the role of local IRBs (14/102; 14%), and allowable policy exceptions (19/102; 19%). The NIH further clarified or provided guidance for selection criteria, IRB responsibilities, and cost in the final policy (June 2016). Local IRB reviews and exemptions guidance were unchanged. Conclusions In this case study, public comments were effective in shaping policy as the NIH modified provisions or planned supplemental guidance in response to comments. Yet critical knowledge gaps remain, and empirical data are necessary. The NIH is considering mechanisms to support the establishment of best practices for sIRB implementation." @default.
- W2793059205 created "2018-03-29" @default.
- W2793059205 creator A5049493571 @default.
- W2793059205 creator A5073334486 @default.
- W2793059205 creator A5073641864 @default.
- W2793059205 creator A5074502941 @default.
- W2793059205 date "2018-08-01" @default.
- W2793059205 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2793059205 title "Why Public Comments Matter: The Case of the National Institutes of Health Policy on Single Institutional Review Board Review of Multicenter Studies" @default.
- W2793059205 cites W169152615 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W1990997033 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2087089820 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2142225512 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2156812612 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2334022078 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2563549215 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2571894895 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2607790474 @default.
- W2793059205 cites W2730133581 @default.
- W2793059205 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002206" @default.
- W2793059205 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6060006" @default.
- W2793059205 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29517531" @default.
- W2793059205 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2793059205 type Work @default.
- W2793059205 sameAs 2793059205 @default.
- W2793059205 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W2793059205 countsByYear W27930592052019 @default.
- W2793059205 countsByYear W27930592052021 @default.
- W2793059205 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2793059205 hasAuthorship W2793059205A5049493571 @default.
- W2793059205 hasAuthorship W2793059205A5073334486 @default.
- W2793059205 hasAuthorship W2793059205A5073641864 @default.
- W2793059205 hasAuthorship W2793059205A5074502941 @default.
- W2793059205 hasBestOaLocation W27930592051 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C109986646 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C2777106319 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C109986646 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C141071460 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C15744967 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C17744445 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C199539241 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C2777106319 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C3116431 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C39549134 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C509550671 @default.
- W2793059205 hasConceptScore W2793059205C71924100 @default.
- W2793059205 hasIssue "8" @default.
- W2793059205 hasLocation W27930592051 @default.
- W2793059205 hasLocation W27930592052 @default.
- W2793059205 hasLocation W27930592053 @default.
- W2793059205 hasLocation W27930592054 @default.
- W2793059205 hasLocation W27930592055 @default.
- W2793059205 hasOpenAccess W2793059205 @default.
- W2793059205 hasPrimaryLocation W27930592051 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W1838228685 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W1992609303 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W2028816189 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W2128457231 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W2501151668 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W2756133758 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W2801327878 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2793059205 hasRelatedWork W371892052 @default.
- W2793059205 hasVolume "93" @default.
- W2793059205 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2793059205 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2793059205 magId "2793059205" @default.
- W2793059205 workType "article" @default.