FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2793197002> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2793197002 abstract "Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is increasingly performed in patients with gastric cancer. However, the usage of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (IEJ) following LTG is limited, as the safety and efficacy remain unclear. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of IEJ following LTG.Studies published from January 1994 to January 2017 comparing the outcomes of IEJ and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EEJ) following LTG were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI). Operative results, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Review Manager 5.3.Seven nonrandomized studies with 785 patients were included. Compared with EEJ, IEJ has less blood loss (WMD: -13.52 ml; 95% CI: -24.82--2.22; P = 0.02), earlier time to first oral intake (WMD: -0.49 day; 95% CI: -0.83--0.14; P < 0.01), and shorter length of hospitalization (WMD: -0.62 day; 95% CI: -1.08--0.16; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between IEJ and EEJ regarding the operation time, anastomotic time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, time to first flatus, anastomosis leakage rate, anastomosis stenosis rate, and proximal resections (all P > 0.05).Compared with EEJ, IEJ has better cosmesis, milder surgical trauma, and a faster postoperative recovery. IEJ can be performed as safely as EEJ. IEJ should be encouraged to surgeons with sufficient expertise.腹腔镜全胃切除胃癌根治术后腹腔内与腹腔外吻合比较：基于近期疗效的荟萃分析摘要背景: 腹腔镜全胃切除术在胃癌治疗中应用日益增加。然而, 腹腔镜全胃切除术后采用腹腔内食管空肠吻合术却很有限, 因其安全性和疗效尚不明确。本篇荟萃分析旨在评估腹腔镜全胃切除术后采用腹腔内食管空肠吻合术的可行性和安全性。 方法: 在PubMed、EBSCO、Cochrane Library、Embase、中国知网数据库中查阅从1994年1月至2017年1月发表的腹腔镜全胃切除术行腹腔内和腹腔外食管空肠吻合术的对比研究。比较并分析两组手术结果, 术后恢复, 和术后并发症情况。用Review Manager 5.3软件计算加权平均差（WMD）和比值比（OR）以它们的95%置信区间（CI）。 结果: 7篇非随机研究文献纳入研究，共包含785名患者。相比于腹腔外食管空肠吻合术,腹腔内食管空肠吻合术术中出血更少(WMD: −13.52 ml; 95 % CI: −24.82 - −2.22; P = 0.02),术后进食时间更早(WMD: −0.49 day; 95 % CI: −0.83 - −0.14; P <0.01),住院时间更短(WMD: −0.62 day; 95 % CI: −1.08 - −0.16; P <0.01)。在手术时间、吻合时间、淋巴结切除数目、术后排气、吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄和近端切缘这些指标上，两组间无明显差异（P>0.05）。 结论: 与腹腔外食管空肠吻合术相比,腹腔内食管空肠吻合术具有更好的美观性,更轻的手术创伤,更快术后恢复等优势，同时可以做到一样安全。因此，应该鼓励具有足够手术经验的外科医生尝试腹腔内食管空肠吻合。." @default.
• W2793197002 created "2018-03-29" @default.
• W2793197002 creator A5020830182 @default.
• W2793197002 creator A5061794869 @default.
• W2793197002 creator A5068097128 @default.
• W2793197002 creator A5077302928 @default.
• W2793197002 creator A5084153784 @default.
• W2793197002 date "2018-03-20" @default.
• W2793197002 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2793197002 title "Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer" @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1145255333 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1177161424 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1507742857 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W16492016 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1795540927 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1817451959 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1968333778 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1968679278 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1971019709 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1979562018 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1982966545 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1991370697 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1992388782 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1995186383 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W1999169625 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2007026880 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2027653389 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2032314108 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2036621682 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2065368520 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2069528737 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2074855350 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2094006758 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2103091627 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2107328434 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2112009002 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2135905661 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2139157978 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2147556159 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2148043628 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2150000105 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2155954809 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2156113665 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2161659702 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2164323613 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2287250785 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2328035128 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2339874598 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2403184644 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2468996569 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2476455067 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2737104929 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2748046578 @default.
• W2793197002 cites W2751111834 @default.
• W2793197002 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.226899" @default.
• W2793197002 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5865318" @default.
• W2793197002 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29521295" @default.
• W2793197002 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2793197002 type Work @default.
• W2793197002 sameAs 2793197002 @default.
• W2793197002 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2793197002 countsByYear W27931970022019 @default.
• W2793197002 countsByYear W27931970022020 @default.
• W2793197002 countsByYear W27931970022022 @default.
• W2793197002 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2793197002 hasAuthorship W2793197002A5020830182 @default.
• W2793197002 hasAuthorship W2793197002A5061794869 @default.
• W2793197002 hasAuthorship W2793197002A5068097128 @default.
• W2793197002 hasAuthorship W2793197002A5077302928 @default.
• W2793197002 hasAuthorship W2793197002A5084153784 @default.
• W2793197002 hasBestOaLocation W27931970021 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C2779915274 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C2780470880 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C2780943399 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C121608353 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C126322002 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C141071460 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C156957248 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C2776478404 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C2779915274 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C2780470880 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C2780943399 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C44249647 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C71924100 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C8443397 @default.
• W2793197002 hasConceptScore W2793197002C95190672 @default.
• W2793197002 hasLocation W27931970021 @default.
• W2793197002 hasLocation W27931970022 @default.
• W2793197002 hasLocation W27931970023 @default.

• next