FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2794217883> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2794217883 abstract "In an increasingly media-rich society, we are ever exposed to more varied marketing techniques. Advertising is no longer limited to traditional outlets such as print and television commercials. Consumers are moving away from watching television on a traditional TV set in favour of new technologies. The development of portable electronic devices such as tablet computers and smartphones has provided new platforms for commercial messages. These products not only increase the number of ways in which advertisers can use to target us, but also change the way we interact with the media. We increasingly use these devices on the go, even attending to multiple screens at the same time. These habits have become increasingly common, yet they may inadvertently increase our susceptibility to advertising communications. Changes in media consumption and government legislation had led advertisers to seek out new ways to target consumers and we need to consider two issues (Ofcom, 2011; Ofcom, 2017a). First, product placements have become increasingly prevalent and are regularly featured in television programs and movies. So, their influence needs to be examined further. Secondly, the existing research tends to neglect large sections of the population. Older adults account for almost one quarter of the UK (Office for National Statistics, 2017) population and watch more television than any other age group (Ofcom, 2013). Yet, little is known about how ageing mediates susceptibility to product placements. This thesis will integrate three areas of existing research and address questions which have emerged from the literature. The literature review (Chapter 1) initially provides an overview of prevalence of product placements. The role of consumer awareness and attitude toward this form of advertising in facilitating susceptibility is discussed in terms of the psychological theories proposed to explain how product placement works. I then debate whether variability in placement stimuli and measures may contribute to inconsistencies within this area of research. Next, I explore how implicit and explicit memory processes may shift in terms of the much-debated age cognitive decline. I consider how such changes might mediate placement impact. By way of example, the theory of ego depletion is evaluated and discussed in relation to ageing effects and product placement research. Finally, I consider how cognitive resource and ego depletion may interact with consumer viewing habits to mediate placement efficacy. In this thesis key issues which have emerged from the literature will be explored in three experimental chapters. Following the replication crisis in psychology research I will initially investigate whether product placement effects can be replicated. The assumption that implicit measures of placement influence are equivalent will be assessed through a comparison of two methods (see Chapter Two). The validity of frequently used measures will be discussed and the more methodologically sound method is put forward. The contribution of the methodological investigation will be discussed in relation to the replication crisis. Second, I will address the paucity of research exploring the impact which product placement has on older adults (see Chapter 3). Though older adults are becoming one of the largest groups in the population, it is not known whether cognitive decline increases vulnerability to this form of advertising. It is assumed within the literature that the mechanisms of placement influence are consistent in different age groups, yet this presumption has not previously been investigated. The impact which cognitive ageing may have on the underlying mechanisms of placement effects will be examined. The third issue to be addressed by this thesis is the role of ego depletion in product placement effects (see Chapter 4). The contribution of ego depletion to placement vulnerability will be assessed. In addition, we will consider a key debate in the ego depletion literature, of whether older adults are susceptible to resource depletion. The thesis will be concluded by the General Discussion (Chapter 5). This section evaluates key findings in relation to existing research. The contribution of the current research will be discussed in relation to the mechanisms of product placement, the effect of ageing on placement vulnerability and methodological considerations for future research. The observations from the thesis will be discussed in relation to theoretical models of memory, ageing and ego depletion. Finally, marketing implications based on the findings of the thesis are proposed. The thesis is presented in five chapters. Chapter 1 provides a literature review of research relevant to product placements. Chapter 2 presents the first paper of the thesis (Experiments 1 and 2), Are all measures equal? A comparison of product placement effects using stimulus based and text choice tasks, and an Appendix. The appendix reports additional analyses exploring order effects of implicit and explicit measures in product placement research. Though these analyses are relevant to the thesis they are beyond the scope of the main paper. Chapter 3 contains the second paper of the thesis (Experiments 3 and 4), The serendipitous decline of memory in aging: An age-related dissociation in the mechanisms of product placement influence, and an Appendix. The appendix reports additional analyses exploring age difference in the decision making process. Though these analyses are relevant to the thesis they are beyond the scope of the main paper. Chapter 4 presents the third paper of the thesis (Experiment 5), The serendipity of the decline of self-control in ageing. Are older adults less susceptible to ego depletion and product placement influence? and an Appendix. The appendix reports exploratory analyses which assess the extent to which COLT performance, time of day, fatigue and hunger mediate ego depletion effects. Though these analyses are relevant to the thesis they are beyond the focus of the main paper. Chapter 5 concludes the thesis with the General Discussion." @default.
• W2794217883 created "2018-03-29" @default.
• W2794217883 creator A5081743475 @default.
• W2794217883 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2794217883 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2794217883 title "Age differences in the underlying mechanisms of product placement influence" @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1590984175 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1798218807 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1966211676 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1968579477 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1976705823 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1980097649 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1982702773 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1986939078 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W1994269859 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2006053529 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2006970072 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2015990656 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2019755710 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2021393796 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2023771552 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2027170967 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2028160313 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2043663043 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2051560765 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2051760835 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2063531088 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2065727721 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2069114739 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2069910709 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2073515916 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2081365002 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2084987647 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2094978658 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2098897974 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2099859459 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2115021067 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2122351448 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2123817056 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2125068113 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2137145004 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2158588286 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2167382627 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2167483210 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2170232927 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2170358153 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2171219364 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2186516452 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2261269024 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2463955269 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W2529112977 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W303848676 @default.
• W2794217883 cites W3122753270 @default.
• W2794217883 doi "https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/254" @default.
• W2794217883 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2794217883 type Work @default.
• W2794217883 sameAs 2794217883 @default.
• W2794217883 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2794217883 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2794217883 hasAuthorship W2794217883A5081743475 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C30772137 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C108827166 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C112698675 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C138885662 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C144024400 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C144133560 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C162853370 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C177264268 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C17744445 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C199360897 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C199539241 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C2524010 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C2777351106 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C2778137410 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C2908647359 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C30772137 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C33923547 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C36289849 @default.
• W2794217883 hasConceptScore W2794217883C41008148 @default.

• next