FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2794392352> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2794392352 endingPage "93" @default.
• W2794392352 startingPage "86" @default.
• W2794392352 abstract "To compare the efficacy and safety in the management of lumbar diseases performed by either posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Interbody fusion is considered the gold standard in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Both PLIF and TLIF have been advocated, and it remains controversial as to the best operative technique.The electronic databases including Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane library were searched to identify relevant studies up to September 2017. The primary outcomes were fusion rate, complications, and clinical satisfaction. The secondary outcomes were length of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, postoperative visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 software.A total of 16 studies involving 1502 patients (805 patients in PLIF group and 697 in TLIF group) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that there was no significant difference in terms of fusion rate (P > 0.05) and clinical satisfaction (P > 0.05) between the 2 groups. TLIF was superior to PLIF with significantly lower incidence of nerve root injury (P < 0.05) and dural tear (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference regarding wound infection (P > 0.05) and graft malposition (P > 0.05). PLIF required significant longer operation time (P < 0.05) and was associated with more blood loss (P < 0.05). Although TLIF was associated with better postoperative visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score than PLIF, there was no statistical difference regarding these results.The available evidence suggests that both TLIF and PLIF could achieve similar clinical satisfaction and fusion rate in the management of degenerative lumbar diseases. However, TLIF was superior to PLIF with shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower incidence of nerve root injury and dural tear. There is no significant difference between both groups regarding wound infection and graft malposition." @default.
• W2794392352 created "2018-03-29" @default.
• W2794392352 creator A5006459289 @default.
• W2794392352 creator A5011173291 @default.
• W2794392352 creator A5052617324 @default.
• W2794392352 creator A5053105165 @default.
• W2794392352 creator A5062658156 @default.
• W2794392352 creator A5065037360 @default.
• W2794392352 creator A5080370122 @default.
• W2794392352 date "2018-04-01" @default.
• W2794392352 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2794392352 title "Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W2794392352 cites W14500706 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W1604057130 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W1976028446 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W1983072151 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2003965082 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2023255460 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2028668515 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2033131114 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2059341649 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2060045429 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2063678775 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2065913007 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2081818333 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2086655810 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2089645140 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2096510429 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2102152458 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2103399350 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2116475791 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2149777915 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2162306717 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2192632477 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2345115988 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2484992419 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2586858350 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2606580976 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2673483870 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W2766020898 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W4255739812 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W783290833 @default.
• W2794392352 cites W987354579 @default.
• W2794392352 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.021" @default.
• W2794392352 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29367001" @default.
• W2794392352 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2794392352 type Work @default.
• W2794392352 sameAs 2794392352 @default.
• W2794392352 citedByCount "62" @default.
• W2794392352 countsByYear W27943923522018 @default.
• W2794392352 countsByYear W27943923522019 @default.
• W2794392352 countsByYear W27943923522020 @default.
• W2794392352 countsByYear W27943923522021 @default.
• W2794392352 countsByYear W27943923522022 @default.
• W2794392352 countsByYear W27943923522023 @default.
• W2794392352 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2794392352 hasAuthorship W2794392352A5006459289 @default.
• W2794392352 hasAuthorship W2794392352A5011173291 @default.
• W2794392352 hasAuthorship W2794392352A5052617324 @default.
• W2794392352 hasAuthorship W2794392352A5053105165 @default.
• W2794392352 hasAuthorship W2794392352A5062658156 @default.
• W2794392352 hasAuthorship W2794392352A5065037360 @default.
• W2794392352 hasAuthorship W2794392352A5080370122 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C126322002 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C141071460 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C14184104 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C142724271 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C168563851 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C204787440 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C2775998654 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C2776478404 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C2780375110 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C2780907711 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C44575665 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C71924100 @default.
• W2794392352 hasConceptScore W2794392352C95190672 @default.
• W2794392352 hasLocation W27943923521 @default.
• W2794392352 hasLocation W27943923522 @default.
• W2794392352 hasOpenAccess W2794392352 @default.
• W2794392352 hasPrimaryLocation W27943923521 @default.
• W2794392352 hasRelatedWork W227561847 @default.
• W2794392352 hasRelatedWork W2282284413 @default.
• W2794392352 hasRelatedWork W2533050362 @default.
• W2794392352 hasRelatedWork W2795288506 @default.

• next