FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2794497741> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2794497741 endingPage "143" @default.
• W2794497741 startingPage "136" @default.
• W2794497741 abstract "Background: Clinical practice is a vital part of nursing education, and highly valued by student nurses. From a student perspective, the clinical environment can be perceived as stressful and not welcoming. Therefore, the relationship between the student and the instructor is fundamental to the learning process. Peer learning offers students the opportunity to learn from each other. Moreover, it was suggested that academic involvement and interaction with faculty and fellow students increases the time and physical and psychological energy that students devote to the academic experience. The positive effects of peer learning have been described as increased cognitive skills, self-confidence, autonomy, clinical skills and reasoning are highlighted. Furthermore, and perhaps more difficult to evaluate in other educational models, are increased self-evaluating skills, collaborative- and leadership abilities, critical thinking and the opportunity to share the experiences of a fellow student without the immediate interference of the preceptor. Aim : The study aimed to compare the effect of using peer learning versus traditional learning on the clinical performance of critical care nursing students. Methods: The study was conducted at the critical and emergency care nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Damanhour University using an experimental comparative design. 100 nursing students enrolled in the third year were selected randomly to participate in this study. These were divided into two groups randomly. - Group I (study group): consisted of 50 students who were similarly assigned into 10 subgroups of 5 students each and they were learned by their colleagues. Group II (control group) included the other 50 students who were similarly assigned to 2 skill labs in subgroups of 25 students each. Results: The finding of the current study indicates significantly better performance scores among peer learning group. This study revealed that the majority of the study group students were positively satisfied as regarding peer learning. Moreover, the  majority of the students in peer group stated that being taught by their peer increases interaction and collaboration with other students, they can communicate more freely with their peer than with their clinical instructor they don't feel freer to approach the instructor for help than their peer . However, they agreed that the feedback they received from their peers is more helpful and they learn more from their peer than from their clinical instructor. Furthermore, they expressed their belief that peer learning experience was worth the time spent and students felt more comfortable when the performance is being assessed by their peer. Conclusion: The results of this study confirm the results of the previous studies, emphasizing numerous positive effects of peer learning methods in the academic environment. The results of this study also suggest that peer-assisted learning increases the confidence, reduces anxiety and affects the development of students' future responsibilities. Therefore, the study recommends more utilization of this approach in nursing education, with training workshops aimed at changing the attitude of nurse educators towards the use of more innovative models of active learning such as peer learning. Keywords: Peer learning, peer tutoring, traditional method, nursing students, clinical performance." @default.
• W2794497741 created "2018-04-06" @default.
• W2794497741 creator A5033817249 @default.
• W2794497741 creator A5054075787 @default.
• W2794497741 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2794497741 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2794497741 title "The Effect of Peer Learning vs. Traditional Learning on Knowledge and Clinical Performance of Critical Care Nursing Students" @default.
• W2794497741 cites W1586165391 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W1655827064 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W1981619485 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W2028644917 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W2049213320 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W2068076147 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W2110149313 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W2156761876 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W2158667872 @default.
• W2794497741 cites W2809882 @default.
• W2794497741 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2794497741 type Work @default.
• W2794497741 sameAs 2794497741 @default.
• W2794497741 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2794497741 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2794497741 hasAuthorship W2794497741A5033817249 @default.
• W2794497741 hasAuthorship W2794497741A5054075787 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C113616995 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C128593788 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C2779742342 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C533356498 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C113616995 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C128593788 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C15744967 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C159110408 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C17744445 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C19417346 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C199539241 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C2779742342 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C509550671 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C533356498 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C65414064 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C71924100 @default.
• W2794497741 hasConceptScore W2794497741C77805123 @default.
• W2794497741 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2794497741 hasLocation W27944977411 @default.
• W2794497741 hasOpenAccess W2794497741 @default.
• W2794497741 hasPrimaryLocation W27944977411 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W1590474993 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2063745460 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2088998353 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2094599545 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2110149313 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2218635434 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2414440459 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2612352596 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2735753575 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2771879049 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2792854203 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2807745312 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2883511216 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2901002408 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2917355850 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2974172630 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W3160469355 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W3208392095 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W1858364020 @default.
• W2794497741 hasRelatedWork W2356867165 @default.
• W2794497741 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W2794497741 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2794497741 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2794497741 magId "2794497741" @default.
• W2794497741 workType "article" @default.