FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2794865245> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2794865245 endingPage "2522" @default.
• W2794865245 startingPage "2511" @default.
• W2794865245 abstract "The Cognitive Reflection Test, measuring intuition inhibition and cognitive reflection, has become extremely popular because it reliably predicts reasoning performance, decision-making, and beliefs. Across studies, the response format of CRT items sometimes differs, based on the assumed construct equivalence of tests with open-ended versus multiple-choice items (the equivalence hypothesis). Evidence and theoretical reasons, however, suggest that the cognitive processes measured by these response formats and their associated performances might differ (the nonequivalence hypothesis). We tested the two hypotheses experimentally by assessing the performance in tests with different response formats and by comparing their predictive and construct validity. In a between-subjects experiment (n = 452), participants answered stem-equivalent CRT items in an open-ended, a two-option, or a four-option response format and then completed tasks on belief bias, denominator neglect, and paranormal beliefs (benchmark indicators of predictive validity), as well as on actively open-minded thinking and numeracy (benchmark indicators of construct validity). We found no significant differences between the three response formats in the numbers of correct responses, the numbers of intuitive responses (with the exception of the two-option version, which had a higher number than the other tests), and the correlational patterns of the indicators of predictive and construct validity. All three test versions were similarly reliable, but the multiple-choice formats were completed more quickly. We speculate that the specific nature of the CRT items helps build construct equivalence among the different response formats. We recommend using the validated multiple-choice version of the CRT presented here, particularly the four-option CRT, for practical and methodological reasons. Supplementary materials and data are available at https://osf.io/mzhyc/ ." @default.
• W2794865245 created "2018-04-06" @default.
• W2794865245 creator A5047186730 @default.
• W2794865245 creator A5079047091 @default.
• W2794865245 date "2018-03-27" @default.
• W2794865245 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2794865245 title "Effect of response format on cognitive reflection: Validating a two- and four-option multiple choice question version of the Cognitive Reflection Test" @default.
• W2794865245 cites W1831156184 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W1938977360 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W1967491952 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W1980063309 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W1981244178 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W1995081088 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2001276843 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2006942639 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2031707258 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2049708930 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2050734380 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2052050815 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2059894954 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2066567226 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2077714195 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2081056419 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2098712569 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2100026878 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2105753174 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2109978697 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2110013374 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2137195241 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2155650562 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2156401906 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2158733199 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2159527690 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2161080627 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2194774191 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2198427466 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2278988877 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2317198474 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2494441066 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2518674980 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2525509566 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2559500675 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W2594248660 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W4238740420 @default.
• W2794865245 cites W621487820 @default.
• W2794865245 doi "https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1029-4" @default.
• W2794865245 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29589333" @default.
• W2794865245 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2794865245 type Work @default.
• W2794865245 sameAs 2794865245 @default.
• W2794865245 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W2794865245 countsByYear W27948652452019 @default.
• W2794865245 countsByYear W27948652452020 @default.
• W2794865245 countsByYear W27948652452021 @default.
• W2794865245 countsByYear W27948652452022 @default.
• W2794865245 countsByYear W27948652452023 @default.
• W2794865245 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2794865245 hasAuthorship W2794865245A5047186730 @default.
• W2794865245 hasAuthorship W2794865245A5079047091 @default.
• W2794865245 hasBestOaLocation W27948652451 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C118615104 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C159447121 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C176730311 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C2780069185 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C2780801425 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C105795698 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C118615104 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C138496976 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C151730666 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C15744967 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C159447121 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C169760540 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C169900460 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C171606756 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C176730311 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C180747234 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C199360897 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C2777267654 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C2780069185 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C2780801425 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C3018023364 @default.
• W2794865245 hasConceptScore W2794865245C33923547 @default.

• next