FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2795044577> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2795044577 abstract "Some thirty years ago “law and economics” emerged as a new paradigm of legal reasoning by providing new legal resolutions to a set a problems that were particularly suited to the application of economics in the legal process. Today algorithms and data, software-based systems, and technology solutions like blockchain both stress existing legal practice and offer new avenues for solving legal problems. This paper proposes that the rise of “computer science and law” as a new legal paradigm is emerging in ways that leverage and respond to the application and ability of computer science knowledge and reasoning to answer novel and venerable legal problems. The paper's analytic approach maps the boundaries of and computer science in this new paradigm, against the stressors that necessitate new approaches with the value of technology solutions already revolutionizing other sectors. The paper answers questions such as what is persuasive or explanatory about law, what social function does it serve, and how is legal reasoning distinctive from philosophy, sociology, economics, and computer science? Following this analytic approach, the paper presents the current evolution of legal pedagogy, practice, and expectations and contributes to a deeper comparative understanding of how can serve important social goals. The paper begins with a definitional section. Descriptions from jurisprudence and legal theory provide a baseline of how philosophy and social sciences differentiate “law” from other disciplines, based on the nature of the reasoning, justifications, outcomes and knowledge that entails. Leveraging what is distinctive about legal reasoning and knowledge, a historical review of computer and data science and artificial intelligence provides a view of the evolution of reasoning and knowledge is modeled using software to accomplish tasks relevant to law. The paper explores how legal practice is evolving to challenges and opportunities posed by computational systems. The paper reviews the “legalhacker” movement that began as a software programming and policy advocacy effort and other “computation law examples of innovations in and policy practice, and focus on technology policy issues. A survey of new legal pedagogy focused on teaching data science, software programming and other technical skills reveals a roadmap of computer science skillsets and techniques that are a current focus for legal educators. Review and comparisons of the information technology response of “legaltech” with “fintech” IT innovations focused on finance or other sectors will reveal the relative trends and strengths observed in the space. Finally, two analytic approaches are proposed for evaluating the strength of new technology tools and and policy practice approaches. A set of key features identify metrics for evaluating automating legal reasoning systems ability to predict, explain, and defend legal decisions. A roadmap of technical skills and areas of focus for new and policy practitioners provide a useful rubric for development of new practice groups, outsourcing and IT strategies, and legal training focused on “computer science and law” practice. Whether the challenge of legal practice in administrative with comment dockets numbering in the tens of millions, protecting fundamental legal principles in practices using complex software systems controlling the fate of defendants, or improving and expanding access to and policy services, the paper describes the expanding role of computer science and and a path forward for legal practitioners in the computational age." @default.
• W2795044577 created "2018-04-06" @default.
• W2795044577 creator A5030495591 @default.
• W2795044577 date "2018-03-16" @default.
• W2795044577 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2795044577 title "The Emergence of 'Computer Science and Law': The New Legal Paradigm for Law and Policy Practice in the Computational Age of Algorithmic Reasoning and Big Data Practice" @default.
• W2795044577 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2795044577 type Work @default.
• W2795044577 sameAs 2795044577 @default.
• W2795044577 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2795044577 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2795044577 hasAuthorship W2795044577A5030495591 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C100701532 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C131330614 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C162040827 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C170692843 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C2777421848 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C2778745459 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C521078695 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C522695570 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C100701532 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C111472728 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C127413603 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C131330614 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C138885662 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C144024400 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C149209484 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C162040827 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C170692843 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C17744445 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C199539241 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C2522767166 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C2777421848 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C2778745459 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C41008148 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C521078695 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C522695570 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C539667460 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C55587333 @default.
• W2795044577 hasConceptScore W2795044577C71043370 @default.
• W2795044577 hasLocation W27950445771 @default.
• W2795044577 hasOpenAccess W2795044577 @default.
• W2795044577 hasPrimaryLocation W27950445771 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W1486970894 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W1971891004 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W1973339887 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W2107115959 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W2247370752 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W2287258767 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W2341918246 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W2619895480 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W2792607519 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3037622146 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3046172860 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3080898400 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3153391496 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3156693147 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3173070935 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3195784899 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3206448182 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W583663911 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W94866041 @default.
• W2795044577 hasRelatedWork W3121350835 @default.
• W2795044577 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2795044577 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2795044577 magId "2795044577" @default.
• W2795044577 workType "article" @default.