FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2795621417> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2795621417 endingPage "919" @default.
• W2795621417 startingPage "913" @default.
• W2795621417 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Nov 2019Identifying and Codifying Complications after Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Administrative Diagnostic and Procedure Codes, and Clinical Chart Review Charles C. Peyton, Richard R. Reich, Dominic Tang, Brandon Alford, Mounsif Azizi, Roger Li, Wade J. Sexton, Michael Poch, and Scott M. Gilbert Charles C. PeytonCharles C. Peyton Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , Richard R. ReichRichard R. Reich Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , Dominic TangDominic Tang Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , Brandon AlfordBrandon Alford School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , Mounsif AziziMounsif Azizi Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , Roger LiRoger Li Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , Wade J. SextonWade J. Sexton Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , Michael PochMichael Poch Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author , and Scott M. GilbertScott M. Gilbert *Correspondence: Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, Florida 33612 telephone: 813-745-8343, FAX: 813-745-8494; E-mail Address: [email protected] Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000398AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: To our knowledge the reliability of administrative claims codes to report postoperative radical cystectomy complications has not been examined. We compared complications identified by claims data to those abstracted from clinical chart review following radical cystectomy. Methods: We manually reviewed the charts of 268 patients treated with radical cystectomy between 2014 and 2016 for 30-day complications and queried administrative complication coding using 805 ICD-9/10 codes. Complications were categorized. Using Cohen κ statistics we assessed agreement between the 2 methods of complication reporting for 1 or more postoperative complications overall, categorical complications and complications stratified by the top quartile length of hospital stay and patients who were readmitted. Results: At least 1 or more complications were recorded in 122 patients (45.5%) through manual chart review and 80 (29.9%) were recorded via claim coding data with a concordance rate of κ=0.16, indicating weak agreement. Concordance was generally weak for categorical complication rates (range 0.05 to 0.36). However, when examining only the top length of stay quartile, 1 or more complications were reported in 32 patients (65%) by the manual chart review and in 12 (25%) via coding data with a concordance rate of κ=–0.2. Agreement was weak, similar to the total cohort. Conclusions: Manual chart review and claim code identification of complications are not highly concordant even when stratified by patients with an extended length of stay, who are known to have more frequent complications. Researchers and administrators should be aware of these differences and exercise caution when interpreting complication reports. References 1. : A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 274. Google Scholar 2. : Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 164. Google Scholar 3. : Urinary diversion and morbidity after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 2010; 116: 331. Google Scholar 4. : Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robot-assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population-based analysis in the United States. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 569. Google Scholar 5. : Accuracy of administrative and clinical registry data in reporting postoperative complications after surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2015; 37: 851. Google Scholar 6. : Determining perioperative complications associated with vaginal hysterectomy: code classification versus chart review. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209: 119. Google Scholar 7. : Administrative data sets are inaccurate for assessing functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2011; 185: 1686. Link, Google Scholar 8. : Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals?Med Care 2002; 40: 856. Google Scholar 9. : Using the National Cancer Database for outcomes research: a review. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 1722. Google Scholar 10. : Bladder cancer and the National Cancer Data Base: new insight or misinformation?Cancer 2018; 124: 1105. Google Scholar 11. : Use of SEER-Medicare data for measuring cancer surgery. Med Care, suppl., 2002; 40: IV-43. Google Scholar 12. : Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med Care 1994; 32: 700. Google Scholar 13. : Complications after radical cystectomy: analysis of population-based data. Urology 2006; 68: 58. Google Scholar 14. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services: Medicare and Medicaid programs: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment; Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment; Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program; Physician Self-Referral; and Patient Notification Requirements in Provider Agreements. Final Rule with Comment Period. Fed Regist 2011; 76: 74122. Google Scholar 15. : Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 666. Google Scholar 16. : A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 973. Google Scholar 17. : Comparison between clinical registry and Medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 290. Google Scholar 18. : Measuring complications of cancer treatment using the SEER-Medicare data. Med Care, suppl., 2002; 40: IV-62. Google Scholar 19. : Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998; 36: 8. Google Scholar 20. : The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187. Google Scholar 21. : Downstream complications following urinary diversion. J Urol 2013; 190: 916. Link, Google Scholar 22. ICD10Data: Convert ICD-9-CM Codes to ICD-10-CM/PCS, or Convert ICD-10-CM/PCS Codes to ICD-9-CM. Available at https://www.icd10data.com/Convert. Accessed May 28, 2019. Google Scholar 23. : Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 2014; 120: 1409. Google Scholar 24. : Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley 2003. Google Scholar 25. : Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA 2015; 313: 483. Google Scholar 26. : Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 2007; 69: 221. Google Scholar 27. : Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194: 257. Google Scholar 28. : How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution. Surgery 2011; 150: 943. Google Scholar 29. : Validity of selected AHRQ patient safety indicators based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data. Health Serv Res 2009; 44: 182. Google Scholar 30. : Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205. Google Scholar The corresponding author certifies that, when applicable, a statement(s) has been included in the manuscript documenting institutional review board, ethics committee or ethical review board study approval; principles of Helsinki Declaration were followed in lieu of formal ethics committee approval; institutional animal care and use committee approval; all human subjects provided written informed consent with guarantees of confidentiality; IRB approved protocol number; animal approved project number. No direct or indirect commercial, personal, academic, political, religious or ethical incentive is associated with publishing this article. © 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySmith J (2019) This Month in Adult UrologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 202, NO. 5, (837-839), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019. Volume 202Issue 5November 2019Page: 913-919Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.KeywordsInternational Classification of Diseasesclinical codingcystectomyurinary bladderpostoperative complicationsAcknowledgmentBiwei Cao provided graphic support.MetricsAuthor Information Charles C. Peyton Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Richard R. Reich Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Dominic Tang Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Brandon Alford School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Mounsif Azizi Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Roger Li Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Wade J. Sexton Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Michael Poch Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida More articles by this author Scott M. Gilbert Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida *Correspondence: Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, Florida 33612 telephone: 813-745-8343, FAX: 813-745-8494; E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Expand All The corresponding author certifies that, when applicable, a statement(s) has been included in the manuscript documenting institutional review board, ethics committee or ethical review board study approval; principles of Helsinki Declaration were followed in lieu of formal ethics committee approval; institutional animal care and use committee approval; all human subjects provided written informed consent with guarantees of confidentiality; IRB approved protocol number; animal approved project number. No direct or indirect commercial, personal, academic, political, religious or ethical incentive is associated with publishing this article. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2795621417 created "2018-04-13" @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5000130471 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5013683254 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5014513676 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5016805354 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5017475053 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5032153597 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5047859811 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5054735116 @default.
• W2795621417 creator A5087611807 @default.
• W2795621417 date "2019-11-01" @default.
• W2795621417 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2795621417 title "Identifying and Codifying Complications after Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Administrative Diagnostic and Procedure Codes, and Clinical Chart Review" @default.
• W2795621417 cites W1597684501 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W1797685174 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W1939126639 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W1969367131 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W1975002062 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W1991400030 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2008523684 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2018777508 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2025486978 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2031012876 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2046205480 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2052354141 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2052881953 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2054352681 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2057367182 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2057780602 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2065810994 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2071227094 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2075284324 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2079951494 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2108029452 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2123867571 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2144173184 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2161010159 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2592783575 @default.
• W2795621417 cites W2782863327 @default.
• W2795621417 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000398" @default.
• W2795621417 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7864380" @default.
• W2795621417 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31219762" @default.
• W2795621417 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2795621417 type Work @default.
• W2795621417 sameAs 2795621417 @default.
• W2795621417 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2795621417 countsByYear W27956214172021 @default.
• W2795621417 countsByYear W27956214172022 @default.
• W2795621417 countsByYear W27956214172023 @default.
• W2795621417 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5000130471 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5013683254 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5014513676 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5016805354 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5017475053 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5032153597 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5047859811 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5054735116 @default.
• W2795621417 hasAuthorship W2795621417A5087611807 @default.
• W2795621417 hasBestOaLocation W27956214172 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C190812933 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C2775910329 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C2780352672 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C105795698 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C121608353 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C126322002 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C190812933 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C2775910329 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C2780352672 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C33923547 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C61434518 @default.
• W2795621417 hasConceptScore W2795621417C71924100 @default.
• W2795621417 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2795621417 hasLocation W27956214171 @default.
• W2795621417 hasLocation W27956214172 @default.
• W2795621417 hasLocation W27956214173 @default.
• W2795621417 hasOpenAccess W2795621417 @default.
• W2795621417 hasPrimaryLocation W27956214171 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2009115226 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2044302646 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2048065763 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2049491763 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2100810438 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2135606630 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2136740560 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2168884487 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W2389157946 @default.
• W2795621417 hasRelatedWork W4241613774 @default.
• W2795621417 hasVolume "202" @default.
• W2795621417 isParatext "false" @default.

• next