Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2795877334> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2795877334 endingPage "435" @default.
- W2795877334 startingPage "428" @default.
- W2795877334 abstract "ObjectiveAlthough early and accurate screening is required for the remediation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), possible gender differences have not been extensively studied. We examined the classification accuracy of the parent and preschool teacher version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) hyperactivity−inattention (HI) subscale in girls and boys.MethodThe study was part of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Parents and preschool teachers rated a total of 238 girls and 276 boys (mean age 3.5 years) with the SDQ HI subscale. Blinded to the parent and teacher ratings, interviewers classified the children by ADHD diagnoses with the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment Interview.ResultsAreas under the curves for the parent HI subscale scores were good for both girls and boys (0.87 and 0.80, respectively). Preschool teacher classifications were fair (0.76) for girls and poor (0.62) for boys, a significant difference (p = .017). The subscale accurately identified children without ADHD at low parent scores (≤4), and fairly accurately identified ADHD at high scores (≥9), with maximum probabilities of finding true cases of 0.75 in girls and 0.55 in boys. Intermediate scores gave the best balance between sensitivity and specificity with low probabilities of correctly identifying children with ADHD.ConclusionThe parental SDQ HI subscale was useful for screening for ADHD in preschool girls and boys. For preschool teachers, the subscale was useful for screening girls. Although early and accurate screening is required for the remediation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), possible gender differences have not been extensively studied. We examined the classification accuracy of the parent and preschool teacher version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) hyperactivity−inattention (HI) subscale in girls and boys. The study was part of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Parents and preschool teachers rated a total of 238 girls and 276 boys (mean age 3.5 years) with the SDQ HI subscale. Blinded to the parent and teacher ratings, interviewers classified the children by ADHD diagnoses with the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment Interview. Areas under the curves for the parent HI subscale scores were good for both girls and boys (0.87 and 0.80, respectively). Preschool teacher classifications were fair (0.76) for girls and poor (0.62) for boys, a significant difference (p = .017). The subscale accurately identified children without ADHD at low parent scores (≤4), and fairly accurately identified ADHD at high scores (≥9), with maximum probabilities of finding true cases of 0.75 in girls and 0.55 in boys. Intermediate scores gave the best balance between sensitivity and specificity with low probabilities of correctly identifying children with ADHD. The parental SDQ HI subscale was useful for screening for ADHD in preschool girls and boys. For preschool teachers, the subscale was useful for screening girls." @default.
- W2795877334 created "2018-04-13" @default.
- W2795877334 creator A5002391130 @default.
- W2795877334 creator A5011852701 @default.
- W2795877334 creator A5013574347 @default.
- W2795877334 creator A5036112727 @default.
- W2795877334 creator A5038059939 @default.
- W2795877334 creator A5070133237 @default.
- W2795877334 creator A5073469733 @default.
- W2795877334 date "2018-06-01" @default.
- W2795877334 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2795877334 title "Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Preschoolers: The Accuracy of a Short Screener" @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1597770204 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1970218371 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1973156967 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1973919480 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1975227229 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1990748933 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1995856724 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W1999640072 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2006126411 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2006617902 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2008405486 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2017460912 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2029109763 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2029733708 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2030647917 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2044595828 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2046444503 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2049698326 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2075711920 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2086231211 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2098063426 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2110308730 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2118127175 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2126595929 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2131960572 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2137537295 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2138863671 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2140070419 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2147697973 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2153372746 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2156030748 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2159555710 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2162012775 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2167985584 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2234926684 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2329215203 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2405934635 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2416619417 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2466649825 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2489918957 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2503705709 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2577086014 @default.
- W2795877334 cites W2594407130 @default.
- W2795877334 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.03.008" @default.
- W2795877334 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29859558" @default.
- W2795877334 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2795877334 type Work @default.
- W2795877334 sameAs 2795877334 @default.
- W2795877334 citedByCount "27" @default.
- W2795877334 countsByYear W27958773342018 @default.
- W2795877334 countsByYear W27958773342019 @default.
- W2795877334 countsByYear W27958773342020 @default.
- W2795877334 countsByYear W27958773342021 @default.
- W2795877334 countsByYear W27958773342022 @default.
- W2795877334 countsByYear W27958773342023 @default.
- W2795877334 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2795877334 hasAuthorship W2795877334A5002391130 @default.
- W2795877334 hasAuthorship W2795877334A5011852701 @default.
- W2795877334 hasAuthorship W2795877334A5013574347 @default.
- W2795877334 hasAuthorship W2795877334A5036112727 @default.
- W2795877334 hasAuthorship W2795877334A5038059939 @default.
- W2795877334 hasAuthorship W2795877334A5070133237 @default.
- W2795877334 hasAuthorship W2795877334A5073469733 @default.
- W2795877334 hasBestOaLocation W27958773341 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C2776793905 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C2780783007 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C3017694942 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C63428231 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C118552586 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C134362201 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C138496976 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C138885662 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C15744967 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C2776793905 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C2780783007 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C3017694942 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C41895202 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C63428231 @default.
- W2795877334 hasConceptScore W2795877334C70410870 @default.