Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2796036888> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W2796036888 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology & Simulation: Training & Skills Assessment II1 Apr 2018PD58-10 VIRTUALLY COMPETENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIRTUAL REALITY AND DRY-LAB ROBOTIC SIMULATION TRAINING Nicholas Raison, Andrea Gavazzi, Takashige Abe, Kamran Ahmed, and Prokar Dasgupta Nicholas RaisonNicholas Raison More articles by this author , Andrea GavazziAndrea Gavazzi More articles by this author , Takashige AbeTakashige Abe More articles by this author , Kamran AhmedKamran Ahmed More articles by this author , and Prokar DasguptaProkar Dasgupta More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2798AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Virtual Reality (VR) and dry-Lab simulation have been widely validated for robotic surgical training. Both modalities are used during the early stages of the learning curve yet no comparative analysis of the two modalities has been undertaken. This study compared VR and dry-lab simulation for basic and intermediate robotic surgical skill training. METHODS A comparative study of 43 robotic novices was undertaken at two centres in the UK and Italy. Participants were allocated to either VR or dry-lab simulation and all completed an equivalent three-session training programme. This consisted of basic robot skills training followed by intracorporeal suturing. On completion of the programme all participants were assessed by performing a urethrovesical anastomosis on a synthetic model. Technical proficiency was measured by two trained raters using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) tool. All participants completed a qualitative post-training assessment questionnaire. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were equal between the two groups. As a result of the training, mean GEARS scores increased by 5.6 and 2.5 following dry-lab and VR simulation training respectively. This difference in training outcomes was confirmed by repeated measures ANOVA. An overall significant difference in training effects was found between the two training modalities across the three training sessions (p= 0.034). On individual analysis of session outcomes, a difference in training only reached significant after the third training session when a more complex task was attempted (Table 2). However, whilst dry-lab training shows a progressive rise in GEARS score across the session, this effect is far less pronounced with the VR training. CONCLUSIONS Both VR and dry-lab simulation were effective in improving robotic surgical skill but they were not equivalent. For more advanced skills training, dry-lab training was found to be superior to VR simulation. Dry-lab training offers significant benefits to robotic surgical training and should remain a core component of the robotic training curriculum. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e1137 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Nicholas Raison More articles by this author Andrea Gavazzi More articles by this author Takashige Abe More articles by this author Kamran Ahmed More articles by this author Prokar Dasgupta More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
- W2796036888 created "2018-04-13" @default.
- W2796036888 creator A5006241226 @default.
- W2796036888 creator A5024667680 @default.
- W2796036888 creator A5080652822 @default.
- W2796036888 creator A5084897373 @default.
- W2796036888 creator A5090902762 @default.
- W2796036888 date "2018-04-01" @default.
- W2796036888 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
- W2796036888 title "PD58-10 VIRTUALLY COMPETENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIRTUAL REALITY AND DRY-LAB ROBOTIC SIMULATION TRAINING" @default.
- W2796036888 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2798" @default.
- W2796036888 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2796036888 type Work @default.
- W2796036888 sameAs 2796036888 @default.
- W2796036888 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2796036888 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2796036888 hasAuthorship W2796036888A5006241226 @default.
- W2796036888 hasAuthorship W2796036888A5024667680 @default.
- W2796036888 hasAuthorship W2796036888A5080652822 @default.
- W2796036888 hasAuthorship W2796036888A5084897373 @default.
- W2796036888 hasAuthorship W2796036888A5090902762 @default.
- W2796036888 hasBestOaLocation W27960368881 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C194969405 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C2779903281 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C3018222959 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C34585555 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C44154836 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C111919701 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C136764020 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C144024400 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C154945302 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C194969405 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C19527891 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C2779182362 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C2779903281 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C3018222959 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C34585555 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C36289849 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C41008148 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C44154836 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C509550671 @default.
- W2796036888 hasConceptScore W2796036888C71924100 @default.
- W2796036888 hasIssue "4S" @default.
- W2796036888 hasLocation W27960368881 @default.
- W2796036888 hasOpenAccess W2796036888 @default.
- W2796036888 hasPrimaryLocation W27960368881 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W1496071259 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W1581797234 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W1999680554 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W2011462824 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W2020212322 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W2078842153 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W2754315635 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W3007475940 @default.
- W2796036888 hasRelatedWork W4362663473 @default.
- W2796036888 hasVolume "199" @default.
- W2796036888 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2796036888 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2796036888 magId "2796036888" @default.
- W2796036888 workType "article" @default.