FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2796131330> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2796131330 endingPage "166" @default.
• W2796131330 startingPage "155" @default.
• W2796131330 abstract "To compare dyadic (marital) functioning between users of natural family planning (NFP) and users of artificial methods of contraception (AMC).A cross-sectional study was conducted in healthy, over eighteen-year-old couples living in stable relationships recruited from primary and secondary health centers in Santiago, Chile. Participants were assessed using a structured interview on sociodemographic and sexual aspects. Primary outcome, marital functioning, was studied using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS).One hundred and thirty-eight couples were studied, sixty-nine in each user group. Both groups had a similar average time living together (124.3 vs. 126.9 months). DAS results were consistent with functional couples in both groups, but on average, the NFP group had a significantly higher DAS score than AMC. After controlling for age, socioeconomic status, time in the relationship, and religious commitment in multivariable analysis, the NFP group had a 47 percent (odds ratio = 1.47) greater possibility of having a functional marital score above the cutoff (DAS > 114) when compared with the AMC group. The AMC group reported more frequency of sexual intercourse but similar sexual satisfaction. Most (>60 percent) of the NFP couples mentioned that their methods improved their relationship.There are sociodemographic differences between both groups, explained partly by unequal access to NFP centers. Both groups have DAS scores within functional range, but NFP users have a higher probability of being in that functional range. This study of mentally and emotionally healthy couples highlights the importance of family planning methods on intimate relationships. Summary Marital functioning is affected by family planning methods. A structured interview and a specific inventory to address conjugal functioning were applied to a group of healthy couples who live in stable relationships and are users of natural family planning (NFP) or artificial methods of contraception (AMC). The results were consistent with functional couples in both groups, but on average, the NFP group had a significantly higher score than the AMC group. The use of NFP explained this difference. This study of mentally and emotionally healthy couples highlights the importance of family planning methods on intimate relationships." @default.
• W2796131330 created "2018-04-13" @default.
• W2796131330 creator A5046175492 @default.
• W2796131330 creator A5047971591 @default.
• W2796131330 creator A5050175053 @default.
• W2796131330 creator A5061548688 @default.
• W2796131330 creator A5072538257 @default.
• W2796131330 creator A5084460362 @default.
• W2796131330 date "2018-04-06" @default.
• W2796131330 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2796131330 title "Marital Functioning in Couples Practicing Periodic Abstinence for Family Planning" @default.
• W2796131330 cites W1482101436 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W1566266902 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W1652548907 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W1801471021 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W1973337168 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W1989716040 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2052258020 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2059965435 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2073877809 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2089890804 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2095102834 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2096191012 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2134137356 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2166268795 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2170824043 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W2306866206 @default.
• W2796131330 cites W3147531337 @default.
• W2796131330 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363918764950" @default.
• W2796131330 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6056796" @default.
• W2796131330 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30046194" @default.
• W2796131330 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2796131330 type Work @default.
• W2796131330 sameAs 2796131330 @default.
• W2796131330 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2796131330 countsByYear W27961313302020 @default.
• W2796131330 countsByYear W27961313302022 @default.
• W2796131330 countsByYear W27961313302023 @default.
• W2796131330 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2796131330 hasAuthorship W2796131330A5046175492 @default.
• W2796131330 hasAuthorship W2796131330A5047971591 @default.
• W2796131330 hasAuthorship W2796131330A5050175053 @default.
• W2796131330 hasAuthorship W2796131330A5061548688 @default.
• W2796131330 hasAuthorship W2796131330A5072538257 @default.
• W2796131330 hasAuthorship W2796131330A5084460362 @default.
• W2796131330 hasBestOaLocation W27961313302 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C147077947 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C2778782608 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C2780687700 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C2781354955 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C118552586 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C126322002 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C143095724 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C144024400 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C147077947 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C149923435 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C151956035 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C15744967 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C2778782608 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C2779076696 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C2780687700 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C2781354955 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C2908647359 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C2986817661 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C70410870 @default.
• W2796131330 hasConceptScore W2796131330C71924100 @default.
• W2796131330 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2796131330 hasLocation W27961313301 @default.
• W2796131330 hasLocation W27961313302 @default.
• W2796131330 hasLocation W27961313303 @default.
• W2796131330 hasLocation W27961313304 @default.
• W2796131330 hasOpenAccess W2796131330 @default.
• W2796131330 hasPrimaryLocation W27961313301 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W2069742007 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W2072560317 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W2120198675 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W2467241288 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W2938530341 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W3009192387 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W3034527076 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W4301134404 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W2612486598 @default.
• W2796131330 hasRelatedWork W2743545795 @default.
• W2796131330 hasVolume "85" @default.
• W2796131330 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2796131330 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next