FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2797871837> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2797871837 endingPage "194" @default.
• W2797871837 startingPage "193" @default.
• W2797871837 abstract "A traditional way to account for individual BW variability in swine nutrition trials is to block animals by initial weight (IW) – this is known as complete randomized block design (CRBD). In this design, animals are stratified into groups based on the distribution of the IW data, where the number of groups is defined by the researcher. Furthermore, increasing the number of blocks removes residual degrees-of-freedom, which can potentially decrease statistical power (POW). In contrast, IW could be used as a covariate in complete randomized designs (CRD), while consuming one degree-of-freedom. The objective of this study was to compare POW of CRBD and CRD using stochastic simulation. We evaluated the effect of a dietary treatment (Control or Test) on ADG. Effect of the Test Diet was set to 10g/d. Different scenarios were evaluated: 5 correlations between IW and ADG (0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 0.99); 5 residual variances (25 to 125, by 25 g2/d2); and 6 replicates/treatment (6 to 21, by 3 pigs), for a total of 150 scenarios. Each scenario was simulated 1,000 times. For each simulation, animals were either randomly assigned to diets (CRD) or ranked by IW, classified into 1 of 3 blocking groups, and then randomly assigned to diets within blocks (CRBD). POW was calculated using P<0.05 for Diet effect. For all scenarios, POW increased as the number of replicates/treatment increased, and as the residual variance decreased. The overall average POW of CRD and CRBD were 75.4% and 74.5%, respectively. Albeit similar, greater variability in POW was observed for CRBD compared to CRD, with CV of 22.6% and 19.3%, respectively. For correlations of 0, 0.25, and 0.5, POW were similar (76% for CRBD and 75.5% for CRD). For higher correlations differences were greater, with 73.3% (CRBD) and 75.2% (CRD), and 71.1% (CRBD) and 75.2% (CRD), for correlations 0.75 and 0.99, respectively. Residual variances were unbiasedly estimated using CRD, but they were increasingly overestimated from correlation 0 (slope=1.01) to 0.99 (slope=1.22) using CRBD. In conclusion, no increase in statistical power was observed by using CRBD in place of CRD. In addition, when the correlation between IW and ADG was greater than 0.5, CRD showed greater power than CRBD. Finally, bias estimates of error variance were obtained using CRBD. These results indicate that CRD using IW as a covariate in the model may yield similar or better results than CRBD when using IW as a blocking factor." @default.
• W2797871837 created "2018-04-24" @default.
• W2797871837 creator A5044351193 @default.
• W2797871837 creator A5044537615 @default.
• W2797871837 creator A5045484613 @default.
• W2797871837 creator A5073842264 @default.
• W2797871837 date "2018-04-01" @default.
• W2797871837 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2797871837 title "359 To Block or Not to Block: The Tale of Initial Weight in Swine Nutrition Trials." @default.
• W2797871837 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky073.356" @default.
• W2797871837 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2797871837 type Work @default.
• W2797871837 sameAs 2797871837 @default.
• W2797871837 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2797871837 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2797871837 hasAuthorship W2797871837A5044351193 @default.
• W2797871837 hasAuthorship W2797871837A5044537615 @default.
• W2797871837 hasAuthorship W2797871837A5045484613 @default.
• W2797871837 hasAuthorship W2797871837A5073842264 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C119043178 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C144938864 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C155512373 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C2777210771 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C105795698 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C11413529 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C114614502 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C119043178 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C140793950 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C144938864 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C155512373 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C2777210771 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C33923547 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C86803240 @default.
• W2797871837 hasConceptScore W2797871837C99476002 @default.
• W2797871837 hasIssue "suppl_2" @default.
• W2797871837 hasLocation W27978718371 @default.
• W2797871837 hasOpenAccess W2797871837 @default.
• W2797871837 hasPrimaryLocation W27978718371 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W2042351583 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W2052172806 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W2078460220 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W2110051888 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W2293389437 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W2322984576 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W2978849696 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W3158768725 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W4238363268 @default.
• W2797871837 hasRelatedWork W4317557429 @default.
• W2797871837 hasVolume "96" @default.
• W2797871837 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2797871837 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2797871837 magId "2797871837" @default.
• W2797871837 workType "article" @default.