FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2799681676> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2799681676 abstract "With the growing amount of clinical research, regulations and research ethics are becoming more stringent. This trend introduces a need for quality assurance measures for ensuring adherence to research ethics and human research protection beyond Institutional Review Board approval. Audits, one of the most effective tools for assessing quality assurance, are measures used to evaluate Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and protocol compliance in clinical research. However, they are laborious, time consuming, and require expertise. Therefore, we developed a simple auditing process (a screening audit) and evaluated its feasibility and effectiveness.The screening audit was developed using a routine audit checklist based on the Severance Hospital's Human Research Protection Program policies and procedures. The measure includes 20 questions, and results are summarized in five categories of audit findings. We analyzed 462 studies that were reviewed by the Severance Hospital Human Research Protection Center between 2013 and 2017. We retrospectively analyzed research characteristics, reply rate, audit findings, associated factors and post-screening audit compliance, etc. RESULTS: Investigator reply rates gradually increased, except for the first year (73% → 26% → 53% → 49% → 55%). The studies were graded as critical, major, minor, and not a finding (11.9, 39.0, 42.9, and 6.3%, respectively), based on findings and number of deficiencies. The auditors' decisions showed fair agreement with weighted kappa values of 0.316, 0.339, and 0.373. Low-risk level studies, single center studies, and non-phase clinical research showed more prevalent frequencies of being major or critical (p = 0.002, < 0.0001, < 0.0001, respectively). Inappropriateness of documents, failure to obtain informed consent, inappropriateness of informed consent process, and failure to protect participants' personal information were associated with higher audit grade (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.003). We were able to observe critical GCP violations in the routine internal audit results of post-screening audit compliance checks in non-responding and critical studies upon applying the screening audit.Our screening audit is a simple and effective way to assess overall GCP compliance by institutions and to ensure medical ethics. The tool also provides useful selection criteria for conducting routine audits." @default.
• W2799681676 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5023704206 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5024676627 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5034562589 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5047599583 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5050139973 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5053512664 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5060316388 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5062979923 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5088824120 @default.
• W2799681676 creator A5091617251 @default.
• W2799681676 date "2018-04-25" @default.
• W2799681676 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2799681676 title "‘Screening audit’ as a quality assurance tool in good clinical practice compliant research environments" @default.
• W2799681676 cites W1973962628 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W1990549581 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2041726909 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2052051944 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2064041854 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2081062312 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2086981071 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2126650764 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2128407187 @default.
• W2799681676 cites W2279545770 @default.
• W2799681676 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0269-2" @default.
• W2799681676 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5922013" @default.
• W2799681676 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29699559" @default.
• W2799681676 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2799681676 type Work @default.
• W2799681676 sameAs 2799681676 @default.
• W2799681676 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2799681676 countsByYear W27996816762021 @default.
• W2799681676 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5023704206 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5024676627 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5034562589 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5047599583 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5050139973 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5053512664 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5060316388 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5062979923 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5088824120 @default.
• W2799681676 hasAuthorship W2799681676A5091617251 @default.
• W2799681676 hasBestOaLocation W27996816761 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C106436119 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C140181557 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C153997805 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C170856484 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C191602146 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C2776579137 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C2778618615 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C62190432 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C106436119 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C118552586 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C121955636 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C140181557 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C142724271 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C144133560 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C153997805 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C15744967 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C170856484 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C180747234 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C191602146 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C19527891 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C199521495 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C204787440 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C2776579137 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C2778618615 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C2779356329 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C2780385302 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C62190432 @default.
• W2799681676 hasConceptScore W2799681676C71924100 @default.
• W2799681676 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2799681676 hasLocation W27996816761 @default.
• W2799681676 hasLocation W27996816762 @default.
• W2799681676 hasLocation W27996816763 @default.
• W2799681676 hasLocation W27996816764 @default.
• W2799681676 hasOpenAccess W2799681676 @default.
• W2799681676 hasPrimaryLocation W27996816761 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W1839452030 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W1940853855 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W2902315649 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W3119521567 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W3123821724 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W3201138707 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W3208085112 @default.
• W2799681676 hasRelatedWork W3208087340 @default.

• next