FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2799690782> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2799690782 abstract "Ureteral stones frequently cause renal colic, and if left untreated, can lead to obstructive uropathy. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy, with or without intracorporeal lithotripsy, are the most common interventions used to treat ureteral stones. ESWL treatment is less invasive than ureteroscopy, but has some limitations such as a high retreatment rate, and is not available in all centres. Recent advances in ureteroscopy have increased success rates and reduced complication rates.To examine evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the outcomes of ESWL or ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteric calculi.We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2011), EMBASE (1980 to March 2011), CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings, all without language restriction.RCTs that compared ESWL with ureteroscopic retrieval of ureteric stones were included in this review. Study participants were adults with ureteric stones requiring intervention. Published and unpublished sources were considered for inclusion.Three authors independently assessed study quality, risk of bias, and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean differences (MD) for continuous data, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Seven RCTs (1205 patients) were included in the review. Stone-free rates were lower in patients who underwent ESWL (7 studies, 1205 participants: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96) but re-treatment rates were lower in ureteroscopy patients (6 studies, 1049 participants: RR 6.18, 95% CI 3.68 to 10.38. ESWL-treated patients had less need for auxiliary treatment (5 studies, 751 participants: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.74; fewer complications (7 studies, 1205 participants: RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.88); and shorter length of hospital stay (2 studies, 198 participants: MD -2.55 days, 95% CI -3.24 to -1.86).Three studies adequately described the randomisation sequence, three studies were unclear on how they randomised, while one study had a high risk of selection bias. All the studies had an unclear risk of performance bias and detection bias, while all had a low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias, or other sources of bias identified.Compared with ESWL, ureteroscopic removal of ureteral stones achieves a greater stone-free state, but with a higher complication rate and longer hospital stay." @default.
• W2799690782 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2799690782 creator A5006817209 @default.
• W2799690782 creator A5015672227 @default.
• W2799690782 creator A5052631604 @default.
• W2799690782 creator A5067772235 @default.
• W2799690782 creator A5084533102 @default.
• W2799690782 date "2011-12-07" @default.
• W2799690782 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2799690782 title "Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi" @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1489741339 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1972077492 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1975496266 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1978004946 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1978751859 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1979118414 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1979243866 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1980344283 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1981877024 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1985455100 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W1992676921 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2007381701 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2018275604 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2018858955 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2033984283 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2034874366 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2039709489 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2051983046 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2056997494 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2059461065 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2059974816 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2065762239 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2066190967 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2077736813 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2079483508 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2080237720 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2087565710 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2089745409 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2095923259 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2118844422 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2126070953 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2136359264 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2138821085 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2140555948 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2156253181 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2158053373 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2166471812 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2340504819 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2347164956 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2409600152 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2417927461 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2466912723 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W2972465324 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W3143078247 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W4237450425 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W4251598323 @default.
• W2799690782 cites W4376099718 @default.
• W2799690782 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006029.pub3" @default.
• W2799690782 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22161396" @default.
• W2799690782 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2799690782 type Work @default.
• W2799690782 sameAs 2799690782 @default.
• W2799690782 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822012 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822014 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822015 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822017 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822018 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822019 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822020 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822021 @default.
• W2799690782 countsByYear W27996907822022 @default.
• W2799690782 crossrefType "reference-entry" @default.
• W2799690782 hasAuthorship W2799690782A5006817209 @default.
• W2799690782 hasAuthorship W2799690782A5015672227 @default.
• W2799690782 hasAuthorship W2799690782A5052631604 @default.
• W2799690782 hasAuthorship W2799690782A5067772235 @default.
• W2799690782 hasAuthorship W2799690782A5084533102 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C2777756408 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C2777950166 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C2779675326 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConceptScore W2799690782C126322002 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConceptScore W2799690782C126894567 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConceptScore W2799690782C141071460 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConceptScore W2799690782C142724271 @default.
• W2799690782 hasConceptScore W2799690782C168563851 @default.

• next