FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2800174757> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2800174757 endingPage "E499" @default.
• W2800174757 startingPage "E489" @default.
• W2800174757 abstract "<h3>BACKGROUND:</h3> Peer review is used to determine what research is funded and published, yet little is known about its effectiveness, and it is suspected that there may be biases. We investigated the variability of peer review and factors influencing ratings of grant applications. <h3>METHODS:</h3> We evaluated all grant applications submitted to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research between 2012 and 2014. The contribution of application, principal applicant and reviewer characteristics to overall application score was assessed after adjusting for the applicant’s scientific productivity. <h3>RESULTS:</h3> Among 11 624 applications, 66.2% of principal applicants were male and 64.1% were in a basic science domain. We found a significant nonlinear association between scientific productivity and final application score that differed by applicant gender and scientific domain, with higher scores associated with past funding success and <i>h</i>-index and lower scores associated with female applicants and those in the applied sciences. Significantly lower application scores were also associated with applicants who were older, evaluated by female reviewers only (v. male reviewers only, −0.05 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.08 to −0.02) or reviewers in scientific domains different from the applicant’s (−0.07 points, 95% CI −0.11 to −0.03). Significantly higher application scores were also associated with reviewer agreement in application score (0.23 points, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.26), the existence of reviewer conflicts (0.09 points, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.11), larger budget requests (0.01 points per $100 000, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.02), and resubmissions (0.15 points, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.17). In addition, reviewers with high expertise were more likely than those with less expertise to provide higher scores to applicants with higher past success rates (0.18 points, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.28). <h3>INTERPRETATION:</h3> There is evidence of bias in peer review of operating grants that is of sufficient magnitude to change application scores from fundable to nonfundable. This should be addressed by training and policy changes in research funding." @default.
• W2800174757 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2800174757 creator A5004052938 @default.
• W2800174757 creator A5019935570 @default.
• W2800174757 creator A5029938799 @default.
• W2800174757 creator A5081571556 @default.
• W2800174757 date "2018-04-22" @default.
• W2800174757 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2800174757 title "Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada" @default.
• W2800174757 cites W1504922255 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W1806876747 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W1975272578 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W1979943489 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W1994884914 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2002502156 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2022090872 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2036108448 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2051213584 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2074585729 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2079712887 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2080107519 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2086731424 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2093120498 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2096354859 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2119393870 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2128438887 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2132736842 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2147830671 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2152573571 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2163445888 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2163716458 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2170508806 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2327638283 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2391110362 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2413221400 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2414378065 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2434619827 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2443110710 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2461645408 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2588455985 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2602549869 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2607483559 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W57785592 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W644992242 @default.
• W2800174757 cites W2182592136 @default.
• W2800174757 doi "https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170901" @default.
• W2800174757 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5915246" @default.
• W2800174757 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29685909" @default.
• W2800174757 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2800174757 type Work @default.
• W2800174757 sameAs 2800174757 @default.
• W2800174757 citedByCount "91" @default.
• W2800174757 countsByYear W28001747572018 @default.
• W2800174757 countsByYear W28001747572019 @default.
• W2800174757 countsByYear W28001747572020 @default.
• W2800174757 countsByYear W28001747572021 @default.
• W2800174757 countsByYear W28001747572022 @default.
• W2800174757 countsByYear W28001747572023 @default.
• W2800174757 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2800174757 hasAuthorship W2800174757A5004052938 @default.
• W2800174757 hasAuthorship W2800174757A5019935570 @default.
• W2800174757 hasAuthorship W2800174757A5029938799 @default.
• W2800174757 hasAuthorship W2800174757A5081571556 @default.
• W2800174757 hasBestOaLocation W28001747571 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C126322002 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C138368954 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C139719470 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C144024400 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C149923435 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C15744967 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C162324750 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C17744445 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C199539241 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C204983608 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C44249647 @default.
• W2800174757 hasConceptScore W2800174757C71924100 @default.
• W2800174757 hasIssue "16" @default.
• W2800174757 hasLocation W28001747571 @default.
• W2800174757 hasLocation W28001747572 @default.
• W2800174757 hasLocation W28001747573 @default.
• W2800174757 hasLocation W28001747574 @default.
• W2800174757 hasOpenAccess W2800174757 @default.
• W2800174757 hasPrimaryLocation W28001747571 @default.
• W2800174757 hasRelatedWork W2037752569 @default.
• W2800174757 hasRelatedWork W2050516961 @default.
• W2800174757 hasRelatedWork W2082158170 @default.

• next