FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2801097315> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2801097315 endingPage "3835" @default.
• W2801097315 startingPage "3830" @default.
• W2801097315 abstract "Objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction and patient and physician assessment of scar appearance after cesarean skin closure with suture versus staples.Methods: Women undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) at ≥23 weeks’ gestation via low-transverse skin incisions at three hospitals in the CROSS Consortium were randomized to receive skin closure using subcuticular absorbable suture or nonabsorbable metal staples. The primary outcome of this substudy, patient satisfaction, was assessed by surveys at the postpartum visit using a 10-point Likert scale. Scar outcomes according to patients and trained observers were assessed at the primary research site using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The POSAS is comprised of a patient-completed assessment including subjective data such as pain and itchiness, and an observer-completed assessment about cosmetic criteria.Results: Between June 2010 and August 2012, 746 women were randomized; 370 received suture and 376 received staples. Satisfaction data were available for 606 (81%). Complete patient scar assessment data were available for 577 (77%) and complete observer scar assessment data were available for 275 (57% of the 480 planned for evaluation at the primary research site). Demographic data for women in the two groups were similar. Satisfaction with the closure method was higher (superior) among women who received suture closure: median 10 (interquartile range 9, 10) versus 9 (interquartile ranges (IQR) 6, 10); p < .01. The suture group also had higher satisfaction with the scar’s appearance at the postpartum visit: median nine (IQR 7, 10) versus 8 (IQR 6, 10); p = .02. Receiving one’s preferred closure method was associated with higher patient satisfaction, and wound complications were associated with lower satisfaction. POSAS scores were superior (lower) in the suture group. Patient Scar Assessment Scale scores were median 15 (IQR 10, 25) for sutures versus 20 (IQR 11, 28) for staples; p < .01. Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores were median 12 (IQR 9, 15) for sutures versus 13 (IQR 9, 16) for staples; p = .01.Conclusions: Satisfaction with the closure method, satisfaction with the scar’s appearance, and patient and physician assessments of scar cosmesis were all superior in those closed with suture. These results further support the use of sutures for cesarean skin closure.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01211600." @default.
• W2801097315 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2801097315 creator A5009852442 @default.
• W2801097315 creator A5018978560 @default.
• W2801097315 creator A5027261604 @default.
• W2801097315 creator A5053447159 @default.
• W2801097315 creator A5057033020 @default.
• W2801097315 creator A5080009892 @default.
• W2801097315 date "2018-05-24" @default.
• W2801097315 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2801097315 title "Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure" @default.
• W2801097315 cites W1606096607 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W1969414516 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W1969681306 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W1990669050 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2003042721 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2005677499 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2016485251 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2062627493 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2070972967 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2072531463 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2123032459 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2153915626 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2157796992 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2171147543 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2298975193 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W2322401949 @default.
• W2801097315 cites W4233684875 @default.
• W2801097315 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1474870" @default.
• W2801097315 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29739243" @default.
• W2801097315 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2801097315 type Work @default.
• W2801097315 sameAs 2801097315 @default.
• W2801097315 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2801097315 countsByYear W28010973152018 @default.
• W2801097315 countsByYear W28010973152019 @default.
• W2801097315 countsByYear W28010973152020 @default.
• W2801097315 countsByYear W28010973152021 @default.
• W2801097315 countsByYear W28010973152022 @default.
• W2801097315 countsByYear W28010973152023 @default.
• W2801097315 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2801097315 hasAuthorship W2801097315A5009852442 @default.
• W2801097315 hasAuthorship W2801097315A5018978560 @default.
• W2801097315 hasAuthorship W2801097315A5027261604 @default.
• W2801097315 hasAuthorship W2801097315A5053447159 @default.
• W2801097315 hasAuthorship W2801097315A5057033020 @default.
• W2801097315 hasAuthorship W2801097315A5080009892 @default.
• W2801097315 hasBestOaLocation W28010973152 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConcept C119060515 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConceptScore W2801097315C119060515 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConceptScore W2801097315C141071460 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConceptScore W2801097315C168563851 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConceptScore W2801097315C2775944032 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConceptScore W2801097315C2777327002 @default.
• W2801097315 hasConceptScore W2801097315C71924100 @default.
• W2801097315 hasIssue "22" @default.
• W2801097315 hasLocation W28010973151 @default.
• W2801097315 hasLocation W28010973152 @default.
• W2801097315 hasLocation W28010973153 @default.
• W2801097315 hasOpenAccess W2801097315 @default.
• W2801097315 hasPrimaryLocation W28010973151 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W2031815656 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W2061253854 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W2125697830 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W2168654427 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W2410413862 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W4244380159 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W4251734836 @default.
• W2801097315 hasRelatedWork W4301489211 @default.
• W2801097315 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W2801097315 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2801097315 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2801097315 magId "2801097315" @default.
• W2801097315 workType "article" @default.