FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2801101499> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2801101499 abstract "Abstract Background and aims Pain management for hospital inpatients remains suboptimal. Previously identified barriers to optimal pain management include staff communication difficulties, confusion around pain management roles and a lack of suitable resources for clinical staff. The emotional, relational and contextual complexities of gastrointestinal (GI) pain create particular challenges for frontline clinical staff attempting to implement a biopsychosocial approach to its management. The current study took place over 2 years, comprised an ethnographic and a feedback phase, and aimed to examine pain management processes with clinical staff in order to generate hypotheses and initiatives for improvement. This paper focuses on two overarching themes identified in the ethnographic phase of the study, centred on the neglected role of both staff and patient distress in GI pain management. Methods Grounded theory and thematic analysis methods were used as part of action research, which involves collaborative working with clinical staff. The study took place on a 60 bed GI ward in a university hospital in London. Participants were clinical staff who were either ward-based or involved in the care of particular patients. This latter group included doctors, nurses, psychologists and physiotherapists from the Acute and Complex Pain Teams. Qualitative data on pain management processes was gathered from staff interviews, consultation groups, and observations of patient-staff interactions. Recruitment was purposive and collaborative in that early participants suggested targets and staff groups for subsequent enquiry. Following the identification of initial ethnographic themes, further analysis and the use of existing literature led to the identification of two overarching pain management processes. As such the results are divided into three sections: (i) illustration of initial ethnographic themes, (ii) summary of relevant theory used, (iii) exploration of hypothesised overarching processes. Results Initially, two consultation groups, five nursing staff and five junior doctors, provided key issues that were included in subsequent interviews ( n =18) and observations ( n =5). Initial ethnographic themes were divided into challenges and resources, reflecting the emergent structure of interviews and observations. Drawing on attachment, psychodynamic and evolutionary theories, themes were then regrouped around two overarching processes, centred on the neglected role of distress in pain management. The first process elucidates the lack of recognition during pain assessment of the emotional impact of patient distress on staff decision-making and pain management practice. The second process demonstrates that, as a consequence of resultant staff distress, communication between staff groups was fraught and resources, such as expert team referral and pharmacotherapy, appeared to function, at times, to protect staff rather than to help patients. Interpersonal skills used by staff to relieve patient distress were largely outside systems for pain care. Conclusions Findings suggest that identified “barriers” to optimal pain management likely serve an important defensive function for staff and organisations. Implications Unless the impact of patient distress on staff is recognised and addressed within the system, these barriers will persist." @default.
• W2801101499 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2801101499 creator A5013594231 @default.
• W2801101499 creator A5051311352 @default.
• W2801101499 date "2018-05-09" @default.
• W2801101499 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2801101499 title "The neglected role of distress in pain management: qualitative research on a gastrointestinal ward" @default.
• W2801101499 cites W1965573123 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W1976647666 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W1995648508 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2005715120 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2009367489 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2056129694 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2065951578 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2096685607 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2109933817 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2110209885 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2142564910 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2150712361 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2263089300 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2561949769 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W2915942876 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W3906214 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W4241574684 @default.
• W2801101499 cites W4242335250 @default.
• W2801101499 doi "https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0045" @default.
• W2801101499 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29794273" @default.
• W2801101499 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2801101499 type Work @default.
• W2801101499 sameAs 2801101499 @default.
• W2801101499 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2801101499 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2801101499 hasAuthorship W2801101499A5013594231 @default.
• W2801101499 hasAuthorship W2801101499A5051311352 @default.
• W2801101499 hasBestOaLocation W28011014992 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C137886200 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C139265228 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C194943564 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C118552586 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C137886200 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C139265228 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C144024400 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C156325361 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C159110408 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C190248442 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C19165224 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C194943564 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C36289849 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C70410870 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C71924100 @default.
• W2801101499 hasConceptScore W2801101499C74196892 @default.
• W2801101499 hasLocation W28011014991 @default.
• W2801101499 hasLocation W28011014992 @default.
• W2801101499 hasLocation W28011014993 @default.
• W2801101499 hasLocation W28011014994 @default.
• W2801101499 hasOpenAccess W2801101499 @default.
• W2801101499 hasPrimaryLocation W28011014991 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W1951939026 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W2003545499 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W2147954254 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W2296994374 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W2561553624 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W3040949820 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W3159850672 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W3215046464 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W4285239446 @default.
• W2801101499 hasRelatedWork W1909559364 @default.
• W2801101499 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2801101499 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2801101499 magId "2801101499" @default.
• W2801101499 workType "article" @default.