FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2801166862> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2801166862 endingPage "1832" @default.
• W2801166862 startingPage "1815" @default.
• W2801166862 abstract "There appears to be a clear general consensus in the literature regarding four critical issues that define the problem of the October 1963 Vaiont landslide and its behaviour that are central to the disaster: (1) the 1963 failure was a reactivation of an ancient landslide; (2) failure took place along thin clay seams (already at residual strength); (3) the sliding surface had a ‘chair’ shape with a (sub)horizontal base; and (4) failure was triggered by inundation of the toe of the slide mass by rising reservoir levels. The key to understanding the Vaiont landslide is the failure surface geometry, which was controlled by the structural geology. It now appears that the so-called chair structure (that was assumed to define the shape of the failure surface) does not exist, and without it, the first consensual point is untenable, and the fourth may not contain the whole truth. We have systematically re-examined the published evidence and undertaken our own new research in order to test the logical and geotechnical validity of the four elements of the consensus. Glacial processes can account for the pre-failure morphology of the landslide site; the clay seams must therefore have been at peak shear strength as there was no ancient landslide. Tectonic processes can account for the failure surface geometry, which does not have a ‘chair’ shape, as well as small-scale structures; and rainfall appears to have been an essential element in the initiation and development of the landslide. Our findings largely contradict the consensus position and thus form the basis of a new overarching hypothesis for the landslide that should account for all of the observed and known features, events and data." @default.
• W2801166862 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2801166862 creator A5024506868 @default.
• W2801166862 creator A5079715432 @default.
• W2801166862 date "2018-05-10" @default.
• W2801166862 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2801166862 title "The Vaiont landslide: re-assessment of the evidence leads to rejection of the consensus" @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1246633734 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1492932189 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1974735988 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1975548904 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1976356069 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1977577707 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1978886710 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1981951416 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1987353378 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W1993392611 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2016132494 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2024679188 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2028536238 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2034392543 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2058259733 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2081590508 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2095309181 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2126337821 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2144308910 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2171603212 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2202904579 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2207350182 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2309124977 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2330264438 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2489819442 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2619724198 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W2802149533 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W4247505404 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W435726239 @default.
• W2801166862 cites W90450315 @default.
• W2801166862 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0996-y" @default.
• W2801166862 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2801166862 type Work @default.
• W2801166862 sameAs 2801166862 @default.
• W2801166862 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2801166862 countsByYear W28011668622018 @default.
• W2801166862 countsByYear W28011668622019 @default.
• W2801166862 countsByYear W28011668622020 @default.
• W2801166862 countsByYear W28011668622021 @default.
• W2801166862 countsByYear W28011668622022 @default.
• W2801166862 countsByYear W28011668622023 @default.
• W2801166862 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2801166862 hasAuthorship W2801166862A5024506868 @default.
• W2801166862 hasAuthorship W2801166862A5079715432 @default.
• W2801166862 hasBestOaLocation W28011668621 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConcept C186295008 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConcept C39410599 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConceptScore W2801166862C111368507 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConceptScore W2801166862C127313418 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConceptScore W2801166862C165205528 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConceptScore W2801166862C186295008 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConceptScore W2801166862C205649164 @default.
• W2801166862 hasConceptScore W2801166862C39410599 @default.
• W2801166862 hasFunder F4320311734 @default.
• W2801166862 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2801166862 hasLocation W28011668621 @default.
• W2801166862 hasLocation W28011668622 @default.
• W2801166862 hasOpenAccess W2801166862 @default.
• W2801166862 hasPrimaryLocation W28011668621 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W1971903373 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W1981975114 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W1983592457 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W1986695572 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W2324398180 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W2756400822 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W2968051574 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W3068173313 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W3108281020 @default.
• W2801166862 hasRelatedWork W3127411478 @default.
• W2801166862 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2801166862 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2801166862 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2801166862 magId "2801166862" @default.
• W2801166862 workType "article" @default.