FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2801187801> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2801187801 endingPage "372" @default.
• W2801187801 startingPage "365" @default.
• W2801187801 abstract "Background: Hip fractures are a common cause of morbidity, especially in the elderly. Treatment of extracapsular hip fractures is highly controversial. Fixation is the main treatment for this type of fracture including extramedullary and intramedullary fixation. The problem of fixation failure remains the main drawback. Many trials have shown that arthroplasty as an alternative option would have better functional results, especially in the early postoperative period. The aim of this review was to compare the functional outcomes of internal fixation versus arthroplasty in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: Two reviewers searched the following databases: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Science Direct for randomized control trials (RCTs) and quasi-random trials comparing the outcomes of internal fixation and arthroplasty in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. We assessed the quality of the studies meeting the eligibility criteria by using the Cochrane assessment tool. For measuring the outcomes, we used the mean difference with 95% confidence interval for continuous data and risk difference, with 95% confidence interval for dichotomous data. Results: The electronic search revealed 3402 citations. After removing duplicate articles, 3397 citations were screened for possible inclusion in the review. Of those 3273 citations were excluded by title or abstract. One hundred and twenty-four full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Six studies compared the results of fixation versus arthroplasty. A meta-analysis of the studies showed no difference in mean Harris Hip Score between groups (mean difference −7.51 [−12.28, −2.74). There was also no difference in the independence of ambulation at 1 yr (risk difference 0.01 [−0.17, 0.19]). The cost of treatment was higher in the arthroplasty group (mean difference 5898.00 [5364.00, 6432.00]). There was no difference in reoperation (risk difference −0.09 [−0.15, −0.03]) and mortality risks (risk difference −0.10 [−0.32, 0.12]). Conclusions: Although most patients with intertrochanteric fracture are treated successfully with internal fixation, arthroplasty could be useful in certain types of fractures. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to assist surgeons in deciding when to use this option." @default.
• W2801187801 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2801187801 creator A5043983617 @default.
• W2801187801 creator A5046839619 @default.
• W2801187801 creator A5052293029 @default.
• W2801187801 creator A5090145107 @default.
• W2801187801 date "2018-07-01" @default.
• W2801187801 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2801187801 title "Functional outcomes of internal fixation and arthroplasty in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a systematic review" @default.
• W2801187801 cites W1953612115 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W1956376946 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W1970001479 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W1980362057 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2019161470 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2019729388 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2040537874 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2046242001 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2055198377 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2071413256 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2073420081 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2084995544 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2093948624 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2102692152 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2127228991 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2132516753 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2158841159 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2162434259 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2168768188 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2173362917 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2178019734 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W224717700 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2291050107 @default.
• W2801187801 cites W2737090203 @default.
• W2801187801 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000000645" @default.
• W2801187801 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2801187801 type Work @default.
• W2801187801 sameAs 2801187801 @default.
• W2801187801 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2801187801 countsByYear W28011878012022 @default.
• W2801187801 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2801187801 hasAuthorship W2801187801A5043983617 @default.
• W2801187801 hasAuthorship W2801187801A5046839619 @default.
• W2801187801 hasAuthorship W2801187801A5052293029 @default.
• W2801187801 hasAuthorship W2801187801A5090145107 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C92162645 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C126322002 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C141071460 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C146249460 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C168563851 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C2776478404 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C2778336525 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C2780660378 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C2908647359 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C44249647 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C71924100 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C82789193 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C92162645 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C95190672 @default.
• W2801187801 hasConceptScore W2801187801C99454951 @default.
• W2801187801 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2801187801 hasLocation W28011878011 @default.
• W2801187801 hasOpenAccess W2801187801 @default.
• W2801187801 hasPrimaryLocation W28011878011 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W1479871144 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W2217553306 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W2233408974 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W2367328649 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W2381982637 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W2431044021 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W2626084264 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W3030276453 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W3032124713 @default.
• W2801187801 hasRelatedWork W3113683798 @default.
• W2801187801 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2801187801 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2801187801 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2801187801 magId "2801187801" @default.
• W2801187801 workType "article" @default.