FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2801194435> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2801194435 endingPage "665" @default.
• W2801194435 startingPage "665" @default.
• W2801194435 abstract "The comparison between 10-0 nylon and Vicryl suture is a very relevant topic in present-day pediatric cataract surgery. The authors of “Comparative analysis of nonabsorbable 10–0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery” have produced good data to objectively analyze the same.[1] Due to low scleral rigidity in children, the surgical incision has to be sutured in all children up to 7 years of age and older if required. 10-0 nylon has been the preferred suture material and is being used in the majority of children undergoing cataract surgery.[2] Being nonabsorbable suture, 10-0 nylon gets loose over a period of time but does not fall off. Loose sutures lead to accumulation of debris and mucous at suture site, eventually leading to either infiltrate or vascularization at the suture site and localized corneal opacity.[3] There is a risk of infection and endophthalmitis through the suture track. Another practical aspect is that most children with pediatric cataract belong to lower socioeconomic strata where chances of compliance with regular follow-up are less. Many of them generally report back only when the loose 10-0 nylon sutures are causing redness and irritation in the eyes. Added to that is the risk and cost of general anesthesia for suture removal. There are incidences of postsuture removal hypopyon and endophthalmitis which all of us have faced once in a while. Luckily, they tend to respond to topical medication only. Earlier publication has also shown that non-absorbable suture like 10-0 Mersilene due to its higher tensile strength has higher postoperative astigmatism when compared to an absorbable suture like Vicryl in pediatric cataract surgery. However, the difference becomes lesser over a period of 6 months. The 10-0 Vicryl, on the other hand, is a good alternative to 10-0 nylon in pediatric cataract surgery. Previous publications on this suture material have been for adult small incision cataract surgery. Although it is of lesser tensile strength, still it is good enough to hold a 2.8 mm incision with one suture. One of the risks is premature opening of the suture due to loose knot of 10-0 Vicryl that can easily be negated by alternate clockwise and counterclockwise knots. The nylon sutures become loose in 3–4-month time, whereas the Vicryl suture gets completely absorbed by then. Previous publications show that almost 70% of 10-0 Vicryl sutures get absorbed by 6 weeks and 100% by 4 months.[4] Although the tensile strength is less, compared to 10-0 nylon,[5] it's good enough to hold the wound without any complications. One of the disadvantages of 10-0 Vicryl suture is the cost, which is higher than nylon and that it cannot be reused after sterilization because the suture becomes brittle and breaks off very easily. However, considering the cost and risk of subjecting the child to another general anesthesia, this point would not go against 10-0 Vicryl sutures. Furthermore, the risk of infections gets minimized as suture track closes fast with absorption of the suture. To conclude, 10-0 Vicryl has been a good alternative to nylon sutures due to the reasons discussed above, and no we have actual data to prove that as well." @default.
• W2801194435 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2801194435 creator A5018043745 @default.
• W2801194435 creator A5022364310 @default.
• W2801194435 creator A5062755809 @default.
• W2801194435 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2801194435 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2801194435 title "Comparative analysis of nonabsorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery" @default.
• W2801194435 cites W111997953 @default.
• W2801194435 cites W2041587614 @default.
• W2801194435 cites W2043291552 @default.
• W2801194435 cites W2043685554 @default.
• W2801194435 cites W2801702841 @default.
• W2801194435 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_272_18" @default.
• W2801194435 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5939159" @default.
• W2801194435 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29676311" @default.
• W2801194435 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2801194435 type Work @default.
• W2801194435 sameAs 2801194435 @default.
• W2801194435 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2801194435 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2801194435 hasAuthorship W2801194435A5018043745 @default.
• W2801194435 hasAuthorship W2801194435A5022364310 @default.
• W2801194435 hasAuthorship W2801194435A5062755809 @default.
• W2801194435 hasBestOaLocation W28011944351 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2775888743 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2776454340 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2776881634 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2777235844 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2777345934 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2779567214 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C2781403741 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C3020183897 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C141071460 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2775888743 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2776454340 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2776881634 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2777235844 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2777327002 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2777345934 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2779567214 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C2781403741 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C3020183897 @default.
• W2801194435 hasConceptScore W2801194435C71924100 @default.
• W2801194435 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2801194435 hasLocation W28011944351 @default.
• W2801194435 hasLocation W28011944352 @default.
• W2801194435 hasLocation W28011944353 @default.
• W2801194435 hasLocation W28011944354 @default.
• W2801194435 hasLocation W28011944355 @default.
• W2801194435 hasOpenAccess W2801194435 @default.
• W2801194435 hasPrimaryLocation W28011944351 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W101372337 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W136367018 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W1968971207 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W1997992206 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W2120794297 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W2163790254 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W2801702841 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W2906333956 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W3007916866 @default.
• W2801194435 hasRelatedWork W7600879 @default.
• W2801194435 hasVolume "66" @default.
• W2801194435 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2801194435 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2801194435 magId "2801194435" @default.
• W2801194435 workType "article" @default.