FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2802274638> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2802274638 abstract "Social workers encounter ethics related challenges on a daily basis. These real-world problems are incredibly complex and can produce intense emotional reactions. The use of ill-structured case examples as an instructional strategy to teach ethical lessons is well-supported in the literature, however, case examples often lack an emotional or affective component. Given the importance of crafting cases for learners, more research is needed to better understand how to construct and present case examples to enhance learning outcomes, specifically related to the influence of emotive content. This study was conducted to assess the effect of emotive content on knowledge acquisition and ethical sense making. The current study employed a posttest only control group design. Emotive content was defined as information related to the character’s emotional reactions or feelings, background, beliefs, physical appearance, and/or goal focus of the character. The ethical dilemma involved the use of social media between a teenage client and student intern at a family service agency. Study materials were placed inside plain packets, each having a unique identification number. The first packet contained the case example and open ended question prompts. The second packet contained the knowledge acquisition questions and demographic related questions. Participants were not permitted to access the first packet while completing the second packet. All questions were presented in a fixed order. Participants were graduate level Master of Social Work students at a university on the coastal U.S. In total, 71 students participated in the study. The emotive group (n = 37) was comprised of 32 women and five men. The non-emotive group (n = 34) was comprised of 30 women and four men. The mean age for student participants was 29.63 (SD = 8.37). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. An independent samples t-test indicated that scores were significantly higher for the non-emotive group (M = 4.91, SD = .96) than the emotive group (M = 4.40, SD = .96), t(69), = -2.22, p = .030, d = .53. An independent samples t-test indicated that scores were significantly higher for students in a field placement (M = 4.77), SD = .96) than students not in a field placement (M = 4.23, SD = .97), t(69) = 2.02, p = .047, d = 0.56. No differences were found between the emotive and non-emotive groups in ethical sense making scores or feelings toward the main characters. Results contribute the growing body of literature regarding the effect of emotion in processing and manipulating complex information. The results suggest that the addition of emotive content to a case example may distract or overwhelm learners. Case examples should be constructed using clear and simple information." @default.
• W2802274638 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2802274638 creator A5056420479 @default.
• W2802274638 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2802274638 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2802274638 title "The Effect of Emotive Content on Knowledge Acquisition and Ethical Sense Making Using an Ill-Structured Case Example" @default.
• W2802274638 doi "https://doi.org/10.25777/wfg0-mb71" @default.
• W2802274638 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2802274638 type Work @default.
• W2802274638 sameAs 2802274638 @default.
• W2802274638 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2802274638 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2802274638 hasAuthorship W2802274638A5056420479 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C2776215170 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C108170787 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C122980154 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C144024400 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C15744967 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C19165224 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C19417346 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C2776215170 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C36289849 @default.
• W2802274638 hasConceptScore W2802274638C77805123 @default.
• W2802274638 hasLocation W28022746381 @default.
• W2802274638 hasOpenAccess W2802274638 @default.
• W2802274638 hasPrimaryLocation W28022746381 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W1607851312 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W1940319840 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2001213031 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2003757896 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2021474171 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2088024556 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2089852819 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2190742765 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2399121902 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2535062554 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2955056666 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2975190287 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W2994167240 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W3006105178 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W3006650063 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W3084500598 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W3090490194 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W3159229663 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W53593071 @default.
• W2802274638 hasRelatedWork W75240444 @default.
• W2802274638 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2802274638 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2802274638 magId "2802274638" @default.
• W2802274638 workType "article" @default.