FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2802570198> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2802570198 abstract "The punishment imposed on criminal offenders by courts often does not exhaust the hardship they experience. There are a number of collateral forms of punishment that many offenders are subjected to as a result of their offending. Some of these deprivations are institutional, such as being dismissed from employment or being disqualified to vote. Other hardships are less predictable and harder to quantify. Public scorn, often directed towards high profile offenders, such as O.J. Simpson and Anthony Weiner, can be the cause of considerable additional suffering to offenders. It can engender feelings of shame, embarrassment and humiliation. At the same time, the high profile nature of the cases provides courts with an opportunity to demonstrate to the wider community the consequences of violating the law. There is no established jurisprudence regarding the role that public criticism of offenders should have in sentencing decisions. Some courts take the view that it should increase the penalty imposed on high profile offenders in order to deter others from committing similar offences. By contrast, it has also been held that public condemnation should reduce penalties because the offender has already suffered as a result of the public condemnation. On other occasions, courts have held public condemnation is irrelevant to sentencing. The issue is increasingly important because the internet and social media have massively increased the amount of publicity that many criminal offenders receive. Simultaneously, this is an under-researched area of the law. In this Article, we develop a coherent jurisprudential and evidence-based solution to the manner in which public opprobrium should be dealt with in sentencing decisions. We argue that sentencing courts should neither increase nor decrease penalties in circumstances where cases have attracted wide-ranging media attention. The hardship stemming from public condemnation is impossible to quantify and in fact causes no tangible suffering to some offenders. Thus, the extent of publicity that an offender receives for committing a crime should be an irrelevant consideration with respect to the choice of punishment. In proposing this reform, we carefully analyze the jurisprudence in the United States. We also consider the position in Australia, where the issue has been considered at some length." @default.
• W2802570198 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2802570198 creator A5008081463 @default.
• W2802570198 creator A5091840812 @default.
• W2802570198 date "2018-04-14" @default.
• W2802570198 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2802570198 title "A Rational Approach to the Role of Publicity and Condemnation in the Sentencing of Offenders" @default.
• W2802570198 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2802570198 type Work @default.
• W2802570198 sameAs 2802570198 @default.
• W2802570198 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2802570198 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2802570198 hasAuthorship W2802570198A5008081463 @default.
• W2802570198 hasAuthorship W2802570198A5091840812 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C2776003135 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C2776716606 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C2779295839 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C2780597079 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C2780666240 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C2781283010 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C15744967 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C17319257 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C17744445 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C199539241 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C202565627 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C2776003135 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C2776716606 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C2779295839 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C2780597079 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C2780666240 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C2781283010 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C73484699 @default.
• W2802570198 hasConceptScore W2802570198C77805123 @default.
• W2802570198 hasLocation W28025701981 @default.
• W2802570198 hasOpenAccess W2802570198 @default.
• W2802570198 hasPrimaryLocation W28025701981 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W1520442205 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W1536647767 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W1943243939 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2022865854 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2029767782 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2034634095 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2267920792 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2332958049 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2346665181 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2586032533 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2591381256 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W2794764773 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W3122633140 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W3123424381 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W3124075100 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W3124287615 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W3124682064 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W72466346 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W72662286 @default.
• W2802570198 hasRelatedWork W1719642217 @default.
• W2802570198 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2802570198 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2802570198 magId "2802570198" @default.
• W2802570198 workType "article" @default.